Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The preventive effect of tamsulosin on voiding dysfunction after prostate biopsy: a prospective, open-label, observational study

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the association of prostate biopsy with voiding impairment and to investigate whether tamsulosin treatment given before prostate biopsy could improve voiding dysfunction after the procedure.

Methods

The study included 88 consecutive patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy without prior BPH medication and were prospectively randomized. Of these 88 patients, 44 patients underwent prostate biopsy only without tamsulosin treatment and served as the control group. The remaining 44 patients were treated with tamsulosin (0.2 mg daily) beginning the day before the biopsy procedure for 7 days. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was recorded in all patients before the procedure and on postbiopsy day 7. Maximal flow rate (Q max) and postvoid residual urine volume were recorded in all patients before the procedure and on postbiopsy days 1 and 7.

Results

No difference was found in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The IPSS (total, storage, and voiding symptom) was not significantly changed after biopsy in both groups. In the control group, the postvoid residual urine volume was increased on postbiopsy days 1 (P < 0.05) and 7, and the Q max was significantly decreased on postbiopsy day 7 compared with the baseline value (P < 0.05). In the tamsulosin group, Q max was significantly increased on postbiopsy days 1 and 7 (P < 0.01). The postvoid residual urine volume was not increased on postbiopsy days 1 and 7. Acute urinary retention after the biopsy procedure did not develop in any of the patients (0 %) in the tamsulosin group, but it developed in two patients (4.5 %) of the control group.

Conclusions

The results of our study show that prostate biopsy leads to objective voiding impairment. Therefore, the use of alpha-1 blocker tamsulosin before biopsy in patients without prior BPH medication may decrease this morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Seo HG, Lee JS (2013) Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in 2010. Cancer Res Treat Off J Korean Cancer Assoc 45(1):1–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK, Stamey TA (1989) Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142(1):71–74; discussion 4–5

  3. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Stamey TA (1989) Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. J Urol 142(1):66–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zaytoun OM, Anil T, Moussa AS, Jianbo L, Fareed K, Jones JS (2011) Morbidity of prostate biopsy after simplified versus complex preparation protocols: assessment of risk factors. Urology 77(4):910–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zisman A, Leibovici D, Kleinmann J, Cooper A, Siegel Y, Lindner A (2001) The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: a prospective study of voiding impairment. J Urol 166(6):2242–2246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berger AP, Gozzi C, Steiner H, Frauscher F, Varkarakis J, Rogatsch H, et al. (2004) Complication rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a comparison among 3 protocols with 6, 10 and 15 cores. J Urol 171(4):1478–1480; discussion 80–81

  7. Djavan B, Waldert M, Zlotta A, Dobronski P, Seitz C, Remzi M et al (2001) Safety and morbidity of first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies: results of a prospective European prostate cancer detection study. J Urol 166(3):856–860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aus G, Ahlgren G, Bergdahl S, Hugosson J (1996) Infection after transrectal core biopsies of the prostate–risk factors and antibiotic prophylaxis. Br J Urol 77(6):851–855

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rietbergen JB, Kruger AE, Kranse R, Schroder FH (1997) Complications of transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsies of the prostate: evaluation of complication rates and risk factors within a population-based screening program. Urology 49(6):875–880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Raaijmakers R, Kirkels WJ, Roobol MJ, Wildhagen MF, Schrder FH (2002) Complication rates and risk factors of 5802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a population-based screening program. Urology 60(5):826–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mkinen T, Auvinen A, Hakama M, Stenman UH, Tammela TL (2002) Acceptability and complications of prostate biopsy in population-based PSA screening versus routine clinical practice: a prospective, controlled study. Urology 60(5):846–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Borboroglu PG, Comer SW, Riffenburgh RH, Amling CL (2000) Extensive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in patients with previous benign sextant biopsies. J Urol 163(1):158–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R et al (2013) Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 64(6):876–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schulman CC, Lock TM, Buzelin JM, Boeminghaus F, Stephenson TP, Talja M (2001) Long-term use of tamsulosin to treat lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 166(4):1358–1363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Leary MP (2001) Tamsulosin: current clinical experience. Urology 58(6 Suppl 1):42–48; discussion 8

  16. Bozlu M, Ulusoy E, Doruk E, Cayan S, Canpolat B, Schellhammer PF et al (2003) Voiding impairment after prostate biopsy: does tamsulosin treatment before biopsy decrease this morbidity? Urology 62(6):1050–1053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from Astellas Pharma Korea, Inc.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee. The institutional ethics committee approved this study, and all of the study participants read and signed an informed consent form.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung Il Jung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chung, S.J., Jung, S.I., Ryu, J.W. et al. The preventive effect of tamsulosin on voiding dysfunction after prostate biopsy: a prospective, open-label, observational study. Int Urol Nephrol 47, 711–715 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-0955-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-0955-7

Keywords

Navigation