Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The sand lizard moves downtown – habitat analogues for an endangered species in a metropolitan area

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urbanisation can be dangerous to biological diversity, but on the other hand cities can enhance local and regional biodiversity by providing habitat analogues for many – sometimes endangered – species that are elsewhere excluded from natural habitats. Sand lizards (Lacerta agilis) are endangered in Germany and populations are declining. This species may colonise urban habitats to a certain degree, but the effects of urban development or urbanisation on their distribution and population densities remain unexplained. The aim of this study was to ascertain if the metropolitan area of Berlin offers secondary habitats for sand lizard populations, which environmental factors affect colonisation success and to what degree they tolerate human impacts. In 2012, sand lizard populations in 30 plots (ten urban, ten suburban, ten rural) were assessed regarding their conservation status and environmental variables. We found 15 sand lizard populations; statistical analyses showed no significant differences in individual numbers among the three urbanisation categories. Regression models revealed that the percentage of suitable nesting sites, basking places and suitable microhabitats had a positive effect on density while individual numbers responded negatively to pets and isolation. Urbanisation neither affected sand lizard population densities nor their conservation status, and optimal habitats appeared independent of urbanisation. Urban as well as metropolitan habitats can therefore serve as refuges for this endangered species and negative impacts can be mitigated by forward-looking management, which is characterised by only minimal interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti M, Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, Zumbrunnen C (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53:1169–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amat F, Llorente GA, Carretero MA (2013) A preliminary study on thermal ecology, activity times and microhabitat use of Lacerta agilis (Squamata: Lacertidae) in the Pyrenees. Folia Zool 52:413–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Amt für Statistik Berlin-Brandenburg (2014) http://www.statistik-berlin-brandenburg.de. Accessed 06 Jan 2015

  • Berglind SA (2000) Demography and management of relict sand lizard Lacerta agilis populations on the edge of extinction. Ecol Bull 48:123–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischoff W (1988) Zur Verbreitung und Systematik der Zauneidechse, Lacerta agilis Linnaeus, 1758. In: Glandt D, Bischoff W (eds) Biologie und Schutz der Zauneidechse (Lacerta agilis). Mertensiella 1:11

  • Blanke I (1999) Erfassung und Lebensweise der Zauneidechse (Lacerta agilis). Z Feldherpotologie 13:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanke I (2004) Die Zauneidechse - zwischen Licht und Schatten. Z Feldherpetologie 7:160

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosbach G, Weddeling K (2005) Zauneidechse Lacerta agilis (Linnaeus, 1758). In: Doerpinghaus A, Eichen C, Gunnermann H, Leopold P, Neukirchen M, Petermann J, Schröder E (eds) Methoden zur Erfassung von Arten der Anhänge IV und V der Flora-Fauna-Habitat-Richtlinie. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn. Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt 20:285–289

  • Carrier JA, Beebee TJC (2003) Recent, substantial, and unexplained declines of the common toad Bufo bufo in lowland England. Biol Conserv 111:395–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiquet C, Dover JW, Mitchell P (2013) Birds and the urban environment: the value of green walls. Urban Ecosyst 16:453–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinge SK (1996) Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landsc Urban Plan 36:59–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover WJ, Johnson ME, Johnson MM (1981) A comparative study of tests for homogeneity of variances, with applications to the outer continental shelf bidding data. Technometrics 23:351–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruyn GJ (1997) Animal communities in Dutch dunes. In: Van der Maarel E (ed) Dry coastal ecosystems: general aspects. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 361–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearborn DC, Kark S (2009) Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conserv Biol 24:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent S, Spellenberg IF (1988) Use of forest ride verges in Southern England for the conservation of the sand lizard Lacerta agilis L. Biol Conserv 45:267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson AJ (2002) Introduction to generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • DWD (2006) German Meteorological Service. http://www.dwd.de. Accessed 10 Oct 2014

  • Edgar P (2002) The effects of public access on amphibians and reptiles. The Herpetological Conservation Trust, Contract Number FC 73-04-145, report for the Coutryside Council for Wales, Bangor

  • Edgar P, Bird DR (2005) Action plan for the conservation oft he sand lizard (Lacerta agilis) in Northwest Europe. Convention on the conservation of European wildlife and nature habitats, pp 1–15

  • Edgar P, Foster J, Baker J (2010) Reptile habitat management handbook. Amphibian and Reptile Conservation, Bournemouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbing K, Günther R, Rahmel U (1996) Zauneidechse - Lacerta agilis Linnaeus 1758. In: Günther R (ed) Die Amphibien und Reptilien Deutschlands. Fischer Verlag, Jena, pp 535–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwanger G (2004) Lacerta agilis (Linnaeus, 1758). Schriftenr Landschaftspfl Naturschutz 69:90–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre MD, Luff ML, Woodward JC (2003) Beetles (Coleoptera) on brownfield sites in England: an important conservation resource? J Insect Conserv 7:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz K, Sowig P (1988) Verbreitung, Habitatansprüche und Gefährdung der Zauneidechse (Lacerta agilis Linnaeus, 1758) in Baden-Württemberg. Mertensiella 1:205–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Glandt D (1979) Beitrag zur Habitat-Ökologie von Zauneidechse (Lacerta agilis) und Waldeidechse (Lacerta vivipara) im nordwestdeutschen Tiefland, nebst Hinweisen zur Sicherung von Zauneidechsen-Beständen. Salamandra 15:13–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2009) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol 25:90–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant BW, Middendorf G, Colgan MJ, Ahmad H, Vogel MB (2011) Ecology of urban amphibians and reptiles: urbanophiles, urbanophobes, and the urbanoblivious. In: Niemelä J, Breuste JH, Elmqvist T, Guntenspergen G, James P, McIntyre NE (eds) Urban ecology: patterns, processes, and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 167–178

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haskins L (2000) Heathlands in an urban setting: effects of urban development on heathlands of south-east Dorset. Br Wildl 11:229–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Haupt H (2009) Streng geschützt - nicht geschützt. Über die gerichtlich abgesicherte Vernichtung einer Zauneidechsen-Population durch die Bundesstadt Bonn. Die Eidechse 20:65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Heym A, Deichsel G, Hochkirch A, Veith M, Schulte U (2013) Do introduced wall lizards (Podarcis muralis) cause niche shifts in a native sand lizard (Lacerta agilis) population? A case study from south-western Germany. Salamandra 49:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JJ, Klink CA, Lugo AE, Norton D, Ojima D, Richardson DM, Sanderson EW, Valladares F, Vilà M, Zamora R, Zobel M (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg JR, Nilon CH (2014) Habitat associations of birds of prey in urban business parks. Urban Ecosyst 18:267–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer KA (2014) Amphibian use of constructed and remnant wetlands in an urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst 17:955–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House SM, Spellerberg IF (1983a) Ecology and conservation of the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis L.) habitat in southern England. J Appl Ecol 20:417–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House SM, Spellerberg IF (1983b) Comparisons of Lacerta agilis habitats in Britain and Europe. Br J Herpetol 6:305–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson HC (1979) The decline of sand lizard Lacerta agilis L population on the sand dunes of the Merseyside coast England. Biol Conserv 16:177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jellinek S, Driscoll DA, Kirkpatrick JB (2004) Environmental and vegetation variables have a greater influence than habitat fragmentation in structuring lizard communities in remnant urban bushland. Aust Ecol 29:294–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I (2011) Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environ Pollut 159:1974–1983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krone A, Kitzmann B (2006) Artenschutzmaßnahme zur Sicherung einer Zauneidechsenpopulation im Norden Berlins. Rana 7:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühnel KD (2005) Railway tracks as habitats for the Sand Lizard (Lacerta agilis) in the urban metropolis of Berlin, Germany. In: Jung RE, Mitchell JC (eds) Urban herpetology. Herpetological Conservation 3

  • LANUV (Landesanstalt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz Nordrhein-Westfalen) (2007) ABC-Bewertung Zauneidechse NRW. Online at: http://www.naturschutzinformationen-nrw.de/artenschutz/web/babel/media/102321.pdf. Accessed 01 Oct 2014

  • Lundholm JT, Richardson PJ (2010) Habitat analogues for reconciliation ecology in urban and industrial environments. J Appl Ecol 47:966–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magle SB, Hunt VM, Vernon M, Crooks KR (2012) Urban wildlife research: past, present, and future. Biol Conserv 155:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM (2001) Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Leiden, pp 19–47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mcdonald RI, Kareiva P, Forman RTT (2008) The implications of current and future urbanization for global protected areas and biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 141:1695–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney LM (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney LM (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney LM (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffert PJ, Dziock F (2012) What determines occurrence of threatened bird species on urban wastelands? Biol Conserv 153:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffert PJ, Dziock F (2013) The influence of urbanisation on diversity and trait composition of birds. Landsc Ecol 28:943–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffert PJ, Marzluff JM, Dziock F (2012) Unintentional habitats: value of a city for the wheatear (Oenanthe oenanthe). Landsc Urban Plan 108:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menke SB, Guénard B, Sexton JO, Weiser MD, Dunn RR, Silverman J (2011) Urban areas may serve as habitat and corridors for dry-adapted, heat tolerant species; an example from ants. Urban Ecosyst 14:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutz T, Donth S (1996) Untersuchungen zur Ökologie und Populationsstruktur der Zauneidechse (Lacerta agilis) an einer Bahnlinie im Münsterland. Z Feldherpetologie 3:123–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemes S, Vogrin M, Hartel T, Öllerer K (2006) Habitat selection at the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis): ontogenetic shifts. N West J Zool 2:17–26

  • Nicholson AM, Spellerberg IF (1989) Activity and home range of the lizard Lacerta agilis L. Herpetol J 1:362–365

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Online at: http://www.r-project.org

  • Rosenzweig ML (2003) Reconciliation ecology and the future of species diversity. Oryx 37:194–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubbo MJ, Kiesecker JM (2005) Amphibian breeding distribution in an urbanized landscape. Conserv Biol 19:504–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rüblinger B (2009) Erfahrungen mit einer landesweiten Stichprobenkartierung von Reptilien in Hessen. Z Feldherpetologie 15:393–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonert B (2009) Fang, Zwischenhälterung und Wiederaussetzung von Zauneidechsen (Lacerta agilis) im Rahmen von Verkehrsprojekten - drei Beispiele aus Berlin. Z Feldherpetologie 15:403–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Senate Department for Urban Development (2008) Berlin Digital Environmental Atlas. Online at: http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/umwelt/umweltatlas/. Accessed 01 Oct 2014

  • Senate Department for Urbane Development and the Environment (2012) Berlin Environmental Atlas. 05.08 Biotope Types (Edition 2012). http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/umwelt/umweltatlas/ed508_01.htm. Accessed 29 July 2015

  • Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šidák ZK (1967) Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 62:626–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellerberg IF (1988) Ecology and management of Lacerta agilis L. populations in England. Mertensiella 1:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss B, Biedermann R (2006) Urban brownfields as temporary habitats: driving forces for the diversity of phytophagous insects. Ecography 29:928–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpel A (1988) Habitat selection and management of the sand lizard, Lacerta agilis, L., at the Utrechtse Heuvelrug, Central Netherlands. Mertensiella 1:122–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpel AHP (2004) Reptiles and amphibians as targets for nature management. Alterra scientific contributions 13. Alterra, Wageningen

  • Thomas JA, Rose RJ, Clarke RT, Thomas CD, Webb NR (1999) Intraspecific variation in habitat availability among ectothermic animals near their climatic limits and their centres of range. Funct Ecol 13:55–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vignoli L, Mocaer I, Luiselli L, Bologna MA (2009) Can a large metropolis sustain complex herpetofauna communities? An analysis of the suitability of green space fragments in Rome. Anim Conserv 12:456–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JW, Jackson ST (2007) Novel climates, no-analog communities and ecological surprises. Front Ecol Environ 5:475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters B, Nijssen M, Geerling G, Kleef HV, Remke E, Verberk W (2012) The effects of shifting vegetation mosaics on habitat suitability for coastal dune fauna a case study on sand lizard (Lacerta agilis). J Coast Conserv 16:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Leno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Jens Schirmel and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology, Technische Universität Berlin, Rothenburgstr. 12, D 12165, Berlin, Germany

    Marina Becker & Sascha Buchholz

Authors
  1. Marina Becker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sascha Buchholz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sascha Buchholz.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Appendix 1

(PDF 353 kb)

Appendix 2

(XLS 24 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Becker, M., Buchholz, S. The sand lizard moves downtown – habitat analogues for an endangered species in a metropolitan area. Urban Ecosyst 19, 361–372 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0497-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0497-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation