Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Urbanization affects frog communities at multiple scales in a rapidly developing African city

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urbanization is worldwide among the biggest threats to amphibian populations. However, hardly any studies have been conducted on the effects thereof in developing countries. Amphibian distribution and community assemblages are not well understood in aquatic and terrestrial habitats that are rapidly changing due to human modification. We conducted four surveys using three detection methods for both anuran larvae and predatory fish in 61 ponds in and around the city of Potchefstroom, South Africa. Tadpoles of eight anuran species and seven fish species were detected during the field surveys. The common river frog (Amietia quecketti) was the most abundant species, occurring in 39 % of the sites, whereas the bubbling kassina (Kassina senegalensis) was detected in only one pond. The remaining six species were detected in 6.6–26.2 % of the sites. Predatory fish were detected in 64 % of the wetlands with mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) and the banded tilapia (Tilapia sparrmanii) detected respectively in 44 and 43 % of the sites. High species richness was associated with well-vegetated wetlands, low urban CBD surface area and conductivity, large pond areas and steeper bank slopes. Conductivity and pH showed only weak negative effects on species richness. This is the first study to quantify the effects of urbanization on frog communities in a developing city on the African continent. Our results demonstrate that both local and landscape variables affect amphibians in a small but rapidly developing city. Accordingly, management practices need to adopt a multi-scale approach if we are to conserve amphibians in African cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams LW (1994) Urban wildlife habitats. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberti M (2008) Advances in urban ecology: integrating humans and ecological processes in urban ecosystems. Springer Science + Business Media, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DR (2008) Model based inference in the life sciences: a primer on evidence. Springer Science + Business Media, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Babbitt KJ, Tanner GW (2000) Use of temporary wetlands by anurans in a hydrologically modified landscape. Wetlands 20:313–322. doi:10.1672/0277-5212(2000)020[0313:UOTWBA]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badenhorst JW, Coetzee JC, Jenkins EH, Van Der Walt AJH (1939) Potchefstroom 1838–1938. Afrikaanse Pers Bpk, Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillie JEM, Hilton-Taylor C, Stuart SN (2004) 2004 IUCN red list of threatened species. A global species assessment. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebee TJ (2013) Effects of road mortality and mitigation measures on amphibian populations. Conserv Biol 27(4):657–68. doi:10.1111/cobi.12063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beebee TJC, Griffiths RA (2005) The amphibian decline crisis: a watershed for conservation biology? Biol Conserv 125:271–285. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bence J (1988) Indirect effects of biological control of mosquitoes by mosquitofish. J Appl Ecol 25:505–521. doi:10.2307/2403840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB (2001) Birds and butterflies along urban gradients in two ecoregions of the U.S. In: Lockwood JL, McKinney ML (eds) Biotic homogenization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, pp 33–56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein AR (1994) Chicken Little or Nero’s fiddle? A perspective on declining amphibian populations. Herpetologica 50:85–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein AR, Wake DB (1995) The puzzle of declining amphibian populations. Sci Am 272:52–57. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0495-52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet X, Bradshaw D, Shine R (1998) Capital versus income breeding: an ectothermic perspective. Oikos 83:333–42. doi:10.2307/3546846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowne DR, Bowers MA (2004) Interpatch movements in spatially structured populations: a literature review. Landscape Ecol 19(1):1–20. doi:10.1023/B:LAND.0000018357.45262.b9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceríaco LMP (2012) Human attitudes towards herpetofauna: the influence of folklore and negative values on the conservation of amphibians and reptiles in Portugal. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 8:8–19. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-8-8

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Channing A (2001) Amphibians of central and Southern Africa. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtenay WR Jr, Meffe GK (1989) Small fishes in strange places: a review of introduced poeciliids. In: Meffe GK, Snelson FF Jr (eds) Ecology and evolution of livebearing fishes (Poeciliidae). Prentice Hall, New Jersey, pp 319–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA (2006) Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biol Conserv 128:231–240. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czech B, Krausman PR, Devers PK (2000) Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. Bioscience 50:593–601. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0593:EAACOS]2.0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deMaynadier PG, Hunter ML Jr (2000) Road effects on amphibian movements in a forested landscape. Nat Area J 20:56–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow CL, Zampella RA (2000) Specific conductance and pH as indicators of watershed disturbance in streams of the New Jersey Pinelands, USA. Environ Manage 26:437–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drinnan IN (2005) The search for fragmentation thresholds in a southern Sydney suburb. Biol Conserv 124:339–349. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Preez L, Carruthers V (2009) A complete guide to the frogs of Southern Africa. Struik Nature, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan RS, Paton PWC (2004) Within-pond parameters affecting oviposition by wood frogs and spotted salamanders. Wetlands 24:1–13. doi:10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0001:WPAOBW]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigenbrod F, Hecnar SJ, Fahrig L (2009) Quantifying the road effect zone: threshold effects of a motorway on anuran populations in Ontario, Canada. Ecol Soc 14(1):24. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art24/

  • Ficetola GF, De Bernardi F (2004) Amphibians in a human-dominated landscape: the community structure is related to habitat features and isolation. Biol Conserv 119:219–230. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay CS, Houlahan J (1997) Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands. Conserv Biol 11:1000–1009. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96144.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formas JR (1995) Amphibians. In: Simonetti JA, Arroyo MTK, Spotorno AE, Lozada E (eds) Diversidad biologica de Chile, CONICYT, Santiago de Chile, pp 314–325

  • Gagné SA, Fahrig L (2007) Effect of landscape context on anuran communities in breeding ponds in the National Capital Region, Canada. Landscape Ecol 22:205–215. doi:10.1007/s10980-006-9012-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné SA, Fahrig L (2010) Effects of time since urbanization on anuran community composition in remnant urban ponds. Environ Conserv 37(2):128–135. doi:10.1017/S0376892910000421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JP (1998) Distribution of woodland amphibians along a forest fragmentation gradient. Landscape Ecol 13:263–268. doi:10.1023/A:1008056424692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie GR, Hero JM (1999) Potential impacts of introduced fish and fish translocations on Australian amphibians. In: Campbell A (ed) Declines and disappearances of Australian frogs Environment Australia, Canberra, pp 131–144

  • Good JA (1998) The potential role of ecological corridors for habitat conservation in Ireland: a review. Irish wildlife manuals, 2nd edn. The Heritage Service, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffis-Kyle KL, Ritchie ME (2007) Amphibian survival, growth and development in response to mineral nitrogen exposure and predator cues in the field: an experimental approach. Oecologia 152:633–642. doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0686-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hager HA (1998) Area-sensitivity of reptiles and amphibians: are there indicator species for habitat fragmentation? Ecoscience 5:139–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer AJ, McDonnell MJ (2008) Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanising world: a review. Biol Conserv 141:2432–2449. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.020

  • Hamer AJ, Parris KM (2011) Local and landscape determinants of amphibian communities in urban ponds. Ecol Appl 21:378–390. doi:10.1890/10-0390.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer AJ, Parris KM (2013) Predation modifies larval amphibian communities in urban wetlands. Wetlands 33(4):641–652. doi:10.1007/s13157-013-0420-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer AJ, Lane SJ, Mahony MJ (2002) The role of introduced mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) in excluding the native green and golden bell frog (Litoria aurea) from original habitats in south-eastern Australia. Oecologia 132:445–452. doi:10.1007/s00442-002-0968-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer AJ, Lane SJ, Mahony MJ (2008) Movement patterns of adult green and golden bell frogs Litoria aurea and the implications for conservation management. J Herpetol 42(2):397–407. doi:10.1670/07-0862.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hazell D, Cunningham R, Lindenmeyer D, Mackay B, Osborne W (2001) Use of farm dams as frog habitats in an Australian agricultural landscape: factors affecting species richness and distribution. Biol Conserv 102:155–169. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00096-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazell D, Hero J-M, Lindenmayer D, Cunningham R (2004) A comparison of constructed and natural habitat for frog conservation in an Australian agricultural landscape. Biol Conserv 119:61–71. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heard GW, McCarthy MA, Scroggie MP, Baumgartner JB, Parris KM (2013) A Bayesian model of metapopulation viability, with application to an endangered amphibian. Divers Distrib 19:555–566. doi:10.1111/ddi.12052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecnar JS, M’Closkey RT (1997) The effects of predatory fish on amphibian species richness and distribution. Biol Conserv 79:123–131. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00113-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houlahan JE, Findlay CS (2003) The effects of adjacent land use on wetland amphibian species richness and community composition. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:1078–1094. doi:10.1139/f03-095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen A, Healey M (2003) Frog communities and wetland condition: relationships with grazing by domestic livestock along an Australian floodplain river. Biol Conserv 109:207–219. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00148-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins G (1971) A century of history: the story of Potchefstroom, 2nd edn. AA Balkema, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Komak S, Crossland MR (2000) An assessment of the introduced mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis holbrooki) as a predator of eggs, hatchlings and tadpoles of native and non-native anurans. Wildlife Res 27:185–189. doi:10.1071/WR99028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane SJ, Hamer AJ, Mahony MJ (2007) Habitat correlates of five amphibian species and of species-richness in a wetland system in New South Wales, Australia. Appl Herpetol 4:65–82. doi:10.1163/157075407779766688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauck B (2004) Using aquatic funnel traps to determine relative density of amphibian larvae: factors influencing trapping. Herpetological Rev 35:248–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemckert F, Haywood A, Brassil T, Mahony M (2006) Correlations between frogs and pond attributes in central New South Wales, Australia: what makes a good pond? Appl Herpetol 3:67–81. doi:10.1163/157075406775247012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemckert F, Hecnar SJ, Pilliod DS (2012) Loss and modification of habitat. In: Heatwole H, Wilkinson JW (eds) Amphibian biology, conservation and decline of amphibians: ecological aspects, effect of humans, and management, vol 10. Surrey Beattey and Sons, Australia, pp 3292–3342

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D (2000) WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comput 10:325–337. doi:10.1023/A:1008929526011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lydeard C, Belk MC (1993) Management of indigenous fish species impacted by introduced mosquitofish: an experimental approach. Southwest Nat 38:370–373. doi:10.1656/058.010.0112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahony M (1999) Review of the declines and disappearances within the bell frog species (Litoria aurea species group) in Australia. In: Campbell A (ed) Declines and disappearances of Australian frogs. Environment Australia, Canberra, pp 81–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM (2001) Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, pp 19–47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy MA (2007) Bayesian methods for ecology. University Press, Cambridge, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy T, Rubridge B (2005) The story of earth and life. Struik Publishers, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52(10):883–890. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Measey GJ, Tolley KA (2011) Investigating the cause of the disjunct distribution of Amietophrynus pantherinus, the Endangered South African western leopard toad. Conserv Genet 12:61–70. doi:10.1007/s10592-009-9989-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokhatla MM, Measey GJ, Chimimba CT, Van Rensburg BJ (2012) A biogeographical assessment of anthropogenic threats to areas where different frog breeding groups occur in South Africa: implications for anuran conservation. Divers Distrib 18:470–480. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00870.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mucina L, Rutherford MC (2006) The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Narins PM (2013) The influence of anthropogenic noise on the evolution of communication systems. J Acoust Soc Am 133(5):3354. doi:10.1121/1.4805701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narins PM, Meenderink SWF (2014) Climate change and frog calls: long-term correlations along a tropical altitudinal gradient. Proc R Soc B 281:20140401. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0401

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norman N, Whitfield G (2006) Geological journeys. Struik Publishers, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Parris KM (2006) Urban amphibian assemblages as metacommunities. J Anim Ecol 75:757–764. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01096.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parris KM, Velik-Lord M, North JMA (2009) Frogs call at a higher pitch in traffic noise. Ecol Soc 14(1):25. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art25/

  • Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:333–365. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearl CA, Adams MJ, Leuthold N, Bury RB (2005) Amphibian occurrence and aquatic invaders in a changing landscape: implications for wetland mitigation in the Willamette Valley, Oregon, USA. Wetlands 25:76–88. doi:10.1672/0277-5212(2005)025[0076:AOAAII]2.0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pechmann JHK, Scott DE, Gibbons JW, Semlitsch RD (1989) Influence of wetland hydroperiod on diversity and abundance of metamorphosing juvenile amphibians. Wetl Ecol Manag 1:3–11. doi:10.1007/BF00177885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellet J, Guisan A, Perrin N (2004a) A concentric analysis of the impact of urbanization on the threatened European tree frog in an agricultural landscape. Conserv Biol 18:1599–1606. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.0421a.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellet J, Hoehn S, Perrin N (2004b) Multiscale determinants of tree frog (Hyla arborea L.) calling ponds in western Switzerland. Biodivers Conserv 13:2227–2235. doi:10.1023/B:BIOC.0000047904.75245.1f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilliod DS, Griffiths RA, Kuzmin SL (2012) Ecological impacts of non-native species. In: Heatwole H, Wilkinson JW (eds) Amphibian biology, conservation and decline of amphibians: ecological aspects, effect of humans, and management, 10th edn. Surrey Beattey and Sons, Australia, pp 3343–3382

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillsbury FC, Miller JR (2008) Habitat and landscape characteristics underlying anuran community structure along an urban–rural gradient. Ecol Appl 18:1107–1118. doi:10.1890/07-1899.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pope SE, Fahrig L, Merriam HG (2000) Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations. Ecology 81:2498–2508. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2498:LCAMEO]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds J, Wu J (1999) Do landscape structural and functional units exist? In: Tenhunen J, Kabat P (eds) Integrating hydrology, ecosystem dynamics, and biogeochemistry in complex landscapes. Wiley, Chichester, pp 273–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter KO (1995) A simple aquatic funnel trap and its application to wetland amphibian monitoring. Herpetol Rev 26:90–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothermel BB (2004) Migratory success of juveniles: a potential constraint on connectivity for pond-breeding amphibians. Ecol Appl 14:1535–1546. doi:10.1890/03-5206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubbo MJ, Kiesecker JM (2005) Amphibian breeding distribution in an urbanized landscape. Conserv Biol 19:504–511. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00101.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell C, Downs CT (2012) Effect of land use on anuran species composition in north-eastern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Appl Geogr 35:247–256. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SANBI, South African National Biodiversity Institute (2009) National mosaic land cover layer compiled by SANBI from various national and provincial sources. Available from Biodiversity GIS website http://bgis.sanbi.org. Accessed 10 Feb 2014

  • Säumel I, Kowarik I (2010) Urban rivers as dispersal corridors for primarily wind-dispersed invasive tree species. Landscape Urban Plan 94:244–249. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffers BR, Paszkowski CA (2013) Amphibian use of urban stormwater wetlands: the role of natural habitat features. Landscape Urban Plan 113:139–149. doi:10.1890/10-0390.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD (1998) Biological delineation of terrestrial buffer zones for pondbreeding salamanders. Conserv Biol 12:1113–1119. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97274.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD (2000) Principles for management of aquatic-breeding amphibians. J Wildlife Manage 64:615–631. doi:10.2307/3802732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR (2003) Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conserv Biol 17:1219–1228. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02177.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer HB, Alford RA, Woodward BD, Richards SJ, Altig RG, Gascon C (1994) Quantitative sampling of amphibian larvae. In: Heyer WR, Donnelly MA, McDiarmid RW, Hayek LC, Foster MS (eds) Measuring and monitoring biological diversity, standard methods for amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 130–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinsch U (1990) Migration and orientation in anuran amphibians. Ethol Ecol Evol 2:65–79. doi:10.1080/08927014.1990.9525494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skelton PH (2001) A complete guide to the freshwater fishes of Southern Africa. Struik Publishers, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AM, Green DM (2005) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 28(1):110–128. doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04042.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass JW, Casey RE, Joseph D, Simon JA (2008) Microcosm investigations of stormwater pond sediment toxicity to embryonic and larval amphibians: variation in sensitivity among species. Environ Pollut 154:291–297. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.10.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J Roy Stat Soc B 64:583–639. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D (2007) OpenBUGS user manual. Version 3.0.2. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fischman DL, Waller RW (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306:1783–1786. doi:10.1126/science.110353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun JWC, Narins PM (2005) Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate. Biol Conserv 121:419–427. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.05.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarr TL, Babbitt KJ (2002) Effects of habitat complexity and predator identity on predation of Rana clamitans larvae. Amphibia-Reptilia 23:13–20. doi:10.1163/156853802320877591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak CJF (2000) Ordination. In: Jongman RHG, Ter Braak CJF, Van Tongeren OFR (eds) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 91–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Tlokwe City Council (2011) Annual report 2012–2013, NW 402. http://www.potch.co.za/pdf2014/Final Annual Report version 1 {Complete}.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2014

  • Trenham PC, Shaffer HB (2005) Amphibian upland habitat use and its consequences for population viability. Ecol Appl 15:1158–1168. doi:10.1890/04-1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trimble MJ, Van Aarde RJ (2014) Amphibian and reptile communities and functional groups over a land-use gradient in a coastal tropical forest landscape of high richness and endemicity. Anim Conserv. doi:10.1111/acv.12111

    Google Scholar 

  • Vershinin VL, Tereshin SY (1999) Physiological parameters of amphibians in ecosystems of urbanized territories. Russ J Ecol 30:255–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Voituron Y, Lengagne T (2008) Freezing before mating severely affects the fitness of a capital breeder. Physiol Biochem Zool 81(2):204–210. doi:10.1086/527422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vos CC, Chardon JP (1998) Effects of habitat fragmentation and road density on the distribution pattern of the moor frog Rana arvalis. J Appl Ecol 35:44–56. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00284.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellborn GA, Skelly DK, Werner EE (1996) Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:337–363. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintle BA, McCarthy MA, Parris KM, Burgman MA (2004) Precision and bias of methods for estimating point survey detection probabilities. Ecol Appl 14:703–712. doi:10.1890/02-5166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, David J (2002) A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications. Ecol Model 153:7–26. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00499-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The National Research Foundation provided financial support to DJDK for 2 years of this study (Grant UID: 84458). Stiftung Artenschutz awarded a grant for recording equipment used in this study. AJH was supported by The Baker Foundation. All appropriate ethics and other approvals were obtained for the research by the North-West University Ethics Committee (Ref. NWU-00005-14-53).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa

    Donnavan J. D. Kruger & Louis H. Du Preez

  2. Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, c/o School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia

    Andrew J. Hamer

Authors
  1. Donnavan J. D. Kruger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew J. Hamer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Louis H. Du Preez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donnavan J. D. Kruger.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table A1

(DOCX 32 kb)

Table A2

(DOCX 27 kb)

Table A3

(DOCX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kruger, D.J.D., Hamer, A.J. & Du Preez, L.H. Urbanization affects frog communities at multiple scales in a rapidly developing African city. Urban Ecosyst 18, 1333–1352 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0443-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0443-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation