Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Student Learning Theory goes (back) to (high) school

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biggs’ 3P (Presage–Process–Product) model, a key framework in Student Learning Theory, provides a powerful means of understanding relations between students’ perceptions of the teaching and learning environment, learning strategies, and learning outcomes. While influential in higher education, fewer tests of the model in secondary education contexts have been conducted. We investigated relations between Presage, Process and Product variables in the Australian secondary education context, using a wider range of Presage variables than is typical, as well as a novel set of outcomes (class participation, homework completion, and educational aspirations). Australian students (N = 5,198) from 13 high schools participated in the study, completing a paper-based survey in class. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test for construct validity of scales. Structural equation modeling was used to determine the fit of the hypothesised 3P model to the data, and estimate direct and indirect effects between Presage, Process and Product variables. Across the Presage variables, academic self-efficacy and perceived teacher support had the strongest direct effects on outcome variables, as well as the strongest indirect effects through the Product variables. Demographic (e.g., age, gender, parental education) and personological (e.g., Big five personality measures) covariates were generally less salient. The present study illustrates the utility of the 3P model in contemporary secondary education settings. Building academic self-efficacy and positive perceptions of teacher support should enhance both the Processes and Products of learning in secondary settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACARA. (2012). National assessment program—literacy and numeracy. Retrieved August 17, 2012, from http://www.naplan.edu.au.

  • Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5, 243–260. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J.-L., & Karabenick, S. A. (2011). Motivation and students’ use of learning strategies: Evidence of unidirectional effects in mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 21, 416–428. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bidjerano, T., & Dai, D. Y. (2007). The relationship between the big-five model of personality and self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 69–81. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149. doi:10.1348/000709901158433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1985). The role of metalearning in study processes. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 185–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1993a). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 12, 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1993b). What do inventories of students’ learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (2001). Enhancing learning: A matter of style or approach? In R. Sternberg & L.-F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 73–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B., & Telfer, R. (1987). The process of learning (2nd ed.). Sydney: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (2001). The bioecological theory of human development. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 10, pp. 6963–6970). New York: Elsevier.

  • Coffman, D. L., & MacCallum, R. C. (2005). Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 235–259. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4002_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. A. (1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research, 51, 281–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes in development: Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 244–254). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77, 113–143. doi:10.3102/003465430298563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, J. P., & Knightley, W. M. (2006). Development and validation of an instrument to assess secondary school students’ perceptions of assessment tasks. Education Studies, 32, 47–58. doi:10.1080/03055690500415951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eley, M. G. (1992). Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students. Higher Education, 23, 231–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1986). Classroom environment. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginns, P., & Barrie, S. (2004). Reliability of single-item ratings of quality in higher education: A replication. Psychological Reports, 95, 1023–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21–43. doi:10.1177/0272431693013001002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W., & Hoffer, S. M. (2000). Multiple imputation in multivariate research. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnable, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 201–218). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., Liem, G. A. D., Martin, A. J., Colmar, S., Marsh, H. W., & McInerney, D. M. (2012). Academic motivation, self-concept, engagement, and performance in high school: Key processes from a longitudinal perspective. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1111–1122. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136. doi:10.3102/00346543066002099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilä, A., Lonka, K., Nieminen, J., & Niemivirta, M. (2012). Relations between teacher students’ approaches to learning, cognitive and attributional strategies, well-being, and study success. Higher Education, 64, 455–471. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9504-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79, 491–525. doi:10.3102/0034654308325693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., Biggs, J., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the learning process questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 261–280. doi:10.1348/000709904773839879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., Leung, Y. P., & McNaught, C. (2008). A workshop activity to demonstrate that approaches to learning are influenced by the teaching and learning environment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9, 43–56. doi:10.1177/1469787407086745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., & McNaught, C. (2007). Enhancing university teaching: Lessons from research into award winning teachers. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. (2012, April 3). Effect size of the indirect effect. Retrieved August 17, 2012, from http://www.davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm.

  • Leung, D., Ginns, P., & Kember, D. (2008). Examining the cultural specificity of approaches to learning in universities in Hong Kong and Sydney. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 251–266. doi:10.1177/0022022107313905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liem, G. A. D., Ginns, P., Martin, A. J., Stone, B., & Herrett, M. (2012). Personal best goals and academic and social functioning: A longitudinal perspective. Learning and Instruction, 22, 222–230. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liem, G. A. D., & Martin, A. J. (2012). The motivation and engagement scale: Theoretical framework, psychometric properties, and applied yields. Australian Psychologist, 47, 3–13. doi:10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00049.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 27–51. doi:10.1080/03075070120099359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modelling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J. L. (2006). OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6, 311–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modeling. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics. A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275–340). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. M., & Cheng, J. H. S. (2008). A multilevel perspective on gender in classroom motivation and climate: Potential benefits of male teachers for boys? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 78–95. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J. (2006a). A motivational psychology for the education of Indigenous students. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 35, 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J. (2006b). Personal bests (PBs): A proposed multidimensional model and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 803–825. doi:10.1348/000709905X55389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. M. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413–440. doi:10.1348/000709906X118036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J. (2011). Prescriptive statements and educational practice: What can structural equation modeling (SEM) offer? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 235–244. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9160-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., Bobis, J., Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2012). Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement amongst middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79, 327–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P., & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morisano, D., Hirsh, J. B., Peterson, J. B., Pihl, R. O., & Shore, B. M. (2010). Setting, elaborating, and reflecting on personal goals improves academic performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 255–264. doi:10.1037/a0018478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Mplus.

  • Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578. doi:10.3102/00346543066004543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005). On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 175–181. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (2002). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P., Martin, E., & Bowden, J. (1989). School environment and sixth form pupils’ approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 129–142. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1989.tb03086.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387. doi:10.1037/a0026838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81, 493–529. doi:10.3102/0034654311421793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Miller, S. D. (2002). Self-efficacy and adolescents’ motivation. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selmes, I. P. (1986). Approaches to normal learning tasks adopted by senior secondary school pupils. British Educational Research Journal, 12, 15–27. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1500880.

  • Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teven, J. J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1997). The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 46, 1–9. doi:10.1080/03634529709379069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. R. (2008). Development and validation of an international English Big-Five Mini-Markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 542–548. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., & Ashwin, P. (2003). Undergraduate students’ experience of learning at the University of Oxford. Oxford: Institute for the Advancement of University Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ryzin, M. J., Gravely, A. A., & Roseth, C. J. (2009). Autonomy, belongingness, and engagement in school as contributors to adolescent psychological well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10964-007-9257-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E. (1988). Assessment and training of student learning strategies. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning styles and learning strategies. New York: Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. C., Ridley, D. S., Dahl, T., & Weber, E. S. (1988). Helping students develop strategies for effective learning. Educational Leadership, 46(4), 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 202–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Tonks, S. (2002). Adolescents’ expectancies for success and achievement task values during middle and high school years. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildrim, S. (2012). Teacher support, learning strategy use, and achievement: A multilevel mediation model. Journal of Experimental Education, 80, 150–172. doi:10.1080/00220973.2011.596855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Sydney, Education Building A35, Darlington, NSW, 2006, Australia

    Paul Ginns, Andrew J. Martin & Brad Papworth

Authors
  1. Paul Ginns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew J. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brad Papworth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Ginns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ginns, P., Martin, A.J. & Papworth, B. Student Learning Theory goes (back) to (high) school. Instr Sci 42, 485–504 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9291-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9291-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation