Ball, D., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching.

*Journal of Teacher Education,*
*59*, 389–407.

CrossRefBorko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C., Underhill, R., Jones, D., & Agard, P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novices and their instructors give up too easily?

*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,*
*23*, 194–222.

CrossRefBrown, S. (2001). *Reconstructing school mathematics: Problems with problems and the real world*. New York: Peter Lang.

Clark, D., & Sukenik, M. (2006). Assessing fraction understanding using task-based interviews. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), *Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education* (Vol. 2, pp. 337–344). Prague: Charles University.

Clement, J. (2000). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundation and model viability. In A. E. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), *Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education* (pp. 547–589). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Crespo, S., & Sinclair, N. (2008). What makes a problem mathematically interesting? Inviting prospective teachers to pose better problems.

*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,*
*11*, 395–415.

CrossRefDe Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1996). An empirical test of the impact of primitive intuitive models of operations on solving word problems with a multiplicative structure.

*Learning and Instruction,*
*6*, 219–243.

CrossRefDey, I. (1999). *Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry*. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1993). *Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (revised version)*. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M., & Marino, M. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division.

*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,*
*16*, 3–17.

CrossRefGlaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). *The discovery of grounded theory*. Chicago: Aldine.

Greer, B. (1987). Understanding of arithmetical operations as models of situations. In J. Sloboda & D. Rogers (Eds.), *Cognitive processes in mathematics* (pp. 60–80). Oxford: Clarendon.

Greer, B. (1992). Multiplication and division as models of situations. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), *Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning* (pp. 276–295). New York: Macmillan.

Greer, B., Verschaffel, L., & de Corte, E. (2002). The answer is really 4.5: Beliefs about word problems. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), *Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education?* (pp. 271–292). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Harel, G. (1995). From naive interpretist to operation conserver. In J. Sowder & B. Schappelle (Eds.), *Providing a foundation for teaching mathematics in the middle grades* (pp. 143–165). New York: SUNY Press.

Harel, G. (2007). The DNR system as a conceptual framework for curriculum development and instruction. In R. Lesh, E. Hamilton, & J. Kaput (Eds.), *Foundations for the future in mathematics education* (pp. 263–280). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Harel, G. (2008a). DNR perspective on mathematics curriculum and instruction: Focus on proving, Part I.

*Zentralblatt fuer Didaktik der Mathematik,*
*40*, 487–500.

CrossRefHarel, G. (2008b). DNR perspective on mathematics curriculum and instruction, Part II.

*Zentralblatt fuer Didaktik der Mathematik,*
*40*, 893–907.

CrossRefHarel, G., & Koichu, B. (2010). An operational definition of learning.

*Journal of Mathematical Behavior,*
*29*, 115–124.

CrossRefHarel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students’ proof schemes. In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), *Research on collegiate mathematics education* (pp. 234–283). Providence, RI: AMS.

Harel, G., Behr, M., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1994). The impact of number type on the solution of multiplication and division problems: Further considerations. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), *The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics* (pp. 365–388). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Harel, G., Koichu, B., & Manaster, A. (2006). Algebra teachers’ ways of thinking characterizing the mental act of problem posing. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), *Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education* (Vol. 3, pp. 241–248). Prague: Charles University.

Joram, E., Gabriele, A. J., Bertheau, M., Gelman, R., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2005). Children’s use of the reference point strategy for measurement estimation. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,*
*36*, 4–23.

Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), *Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning* (pp. 390–419). New York: Macmillan.

Koichu, B., & Harel, G. (2007). Triadic interaction in clinical task-based interviews with mathematics teachers.

*Educational Studies in Mathematics,*
*65*, 349–365.

CrossRefMa, L. (1999). *Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics*. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Mack, N. (1995). Confounding whole-number and fraction concepts when building on informal knowledge.

*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,*
*26*(5), 422–441.

CrossRefNi, Y., & Zhou, Y.-D. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias.

*Educational Psychologist,*
*40*(1), 27–52.

CrossRefPiaget, J. (1985). *The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development*. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Silver, E. A., Mamona-Downs, J., Leung, S. S., & Penney, K. A. (1996). Posing mathematical problems: An exploratory study.

*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,*
*27*, 293–309.

CrossRefTirosh, D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of children’s conceptions: The case of division of fractions.

*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,*
*31*, 5–25.

CrossRefToluk-Uçar, Z. (2009). Developing pre-service teachers understanding of fractions through problem posing.

*Teaching and Teacher Education,*
*25*, 166–175.

CrossRef