Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical Decision-Making, Gender Bias, Virtue Epistemology, and Quality Healthcare

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robust clinical decision-making depends on valid reasoning and sound judgment and is essential for delivering quality healthcare. It is often susceptible, however, to a clinician’s biases such as towards a patient’s age, gender, race, or socioeconomic status. Gender bias in particular has a deleterious impact, which frequently results in cognitive myopia so that a clinician is unable to make an accurate diagnosis because of a patient’s gender—especially for female patients. Virtue epistemology provides a means for confronting gender bias in clinical decision-making and for correcting or even preventing its impact. The medical literature on cardiovascular and coronary heart disease is used to illustrate the role intellectual virtues can play in redressing the deleterious impact of gender bias on clinical decision-making and practice. Finally, questions are considered surrounding the pedagogy of intellectual virtues for medical students and practicing clinicians in order to provide quality care for patients, regardless of gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams A, Buckingham CD, Lindenmeyer A et al (2008) The influence of patient and doctor gender on diagnosing coronary heart disease. Sociol Health Illn 30:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert DA, Munson R, Resnik MD (1988) Reasoning in medicine: an introduction to clinical inference. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • American Heart Association (2013) Women & cardiovascular diseases. https://my.americanheart.org/idc/groups/heart-public/@wcm/@sop/@smd/documents/downloadable/ucm_319576.pdf

  • American Heart Association (2015) Cardiovascular disease: women’s no. 1 health threat. https://www.heart.org/idc/groups/heart-public/@wcm/@adv/documents/downloadable/ucm_472728.pdf

  • Anderson A (2012) Epistemic justice as a virtue of social institutions. Soc Epistemol 26:163–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anspach RR (2010) Gender and health care. In: Bird CE, Conrad P, Fremont AM, Timmermans S (eds) Handbook of medical sociology, 6th edn. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr J (2011) The inquiring mind: on intellectual virtues and virtue epistemology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Battaly H (2008) Virtue epistemology. Phil Comp 3:639–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumhäkel M, Müller U, Böhm M (2009) Influence of gender of physicians and patients on guideline-recommended treatment of chronic heart failure in a cross-sectional study. Eur J Heart Fail 11:299–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird CE, Rieker PP (2008) Gender and health: the effects of constrained choices and social policies. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bönte M, von dem Knesebeck O, Siegrist J et al (2008) Women and men with coronary heart disease in three countries: are they treated differently? Womens Health Issues 18:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canto JG, Goldberg RJ, Hand MM et al (2007) Symptom presentation of women with acute coronary syndromes: myth vs reality. Arch Intern Med 167:2405–2413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carel H, Kidd IJ (2014) Epistemic injustice in healthcare: a philosophical analysis. Med Health Care Philos 17:529–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celik H, Lagro-Janssen TA, Widdershoven GG et al (2011) Bringing gender sensitivity into healthcare practice: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 84:143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilet-Rosell E (2014) Gender bias in clinical research, pharmaceutical marketing, and the prescription of drugs. Glob Health Action 7:25484. doi:10.3402/gha.v7.25484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colbert JD, Martin BJ, Haykowsky MJ et al (2015) Cardiac rehabilitation referral, attendance and mortality in women. Eur J Prev Cardiol 22:979–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croskerry P (2000) The cognitive imperative: thinking about how we think. Acad Emerg Med 7:1223–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croskerry P (2002) Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Acad Emerg Med 9:1184–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croskerry P (2005) The theory and practice of clinical decision-making. Can J Anesth 52:R1–R8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croskerry P (2009) Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual process model of reasoning. Adv Health Sci Educ 14:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dentzer S (2011) Still crossing the quality chasm—or suspended over it? Health Aff (Millwood) 30:554–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dielissen PW, Bottema Verdonk P et al (2009) Incorporating and evaluating an integrated gender specific medicine curriculum: a survey study of Dutch GP training. BCM Med Educ 9:58. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-9-58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra AF, Verdonk P, Lagro-Janssen AL (2008) Gender bias in medical textbooks: examples from coronary heart disease, depression, alcohol abuse and pharmacology. Med Educ 42:1021–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downie RS, Macnaughton J (2000) Clinical judgment: evidence in practice. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyal L (2000) Gender equity in health: debates and dilemmas. Soc Sci Med 51:931–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elstein AS (1999) Heuristics and biases: selected errors in clinical reasoning. Acad Med 74:791–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricker M (2007) Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gambrill E (2005) Critical thinking in clinical practice: improving the quality of judgments and decisions, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Garb HN (1997) Race bias, social class bias, and gender bias in clinical judgment. Clin Psychol Sci Pr 4:99–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman AI (2012) Reliabilism and contemporary epistemology: essays. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graber ML, Kissam S, Payne VL et al (2012) Cognitive intervention to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf 21:535–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groopman J (2007) How doctors think. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta M, Upshur R (2012) Critical thinking in medicine: what is it? J Eval Clin Pract 18:938–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamberg K (2008) Gender bias in medicine. Womens Health 4:237–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammarström A, Johansson K, Annandale E et al (2014) Central gender theoretical concepts in health research: the state of the art. J Epidemiol Community Health 68:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy J (2011) Improving health care safety and quality: reluctant regulators. Ashgate, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich JB (2004) Women’s health education initiatives: why have they stalled? Acad Med 79:283–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks EP, Kluemper GT (2011) Heuristic reasoning and cognitive biases: are they hindrances to judgments and decision making in orthodontics? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochleitner M, Nachtschatt U, Siller H (2013) How do we get gender medicine into medical education? Health Care Women Int 34:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes M (2012) Managing salience: the importance of intellectual virtue in analysis of biased scientific reasoning. Hypatia 27:736–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassirer JP, Kopelman RI (1991) Learning clinical reasoning. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochanek KD, Xu J, Murphy SL et al (2011) Deaths: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep 60:1–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Legato MJ (ed) (2010) Principles of gender-specific medicine. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipworth W, Kerridge I, Little M et al (2012) Meaning and value in medical school curricula. J Eval Clin Pract 18:1027–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM et al (2010) Heart disease and stroke statistics—2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 121:e46–e215

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcum JA (2012) The virtuous physician: the role of virtue in medicine. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus-Newhall A, Thompson S, Thomas C (2001) Examining a gender stereotype: menopausal women. J Appl Soc Psychol 31:698–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin R, Johnsen EL, Bunde J et al (2005) Gender differences in patients’ attributions for myocardial infarction: implications for adaptive health behaviors. Int J Behav Med 12:39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medina J (2012) The epistemology of resistance: gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and the social imagination. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Melloni C, Berger JS, Wang TY et al (2010) Representation of women in randomized clinical trials of cardiovascular prevention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 3:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhail GW (2005) Coronary heart disease in women. BMJ 331:467–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller-Leimkühler AM (2007) Gender differences in cardiovascular disease and comorbid depression. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 9:71–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery K (2006) How doctors think: clinical judgment and the practice of medicine. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore SHE (2008) Gender and the ‘new paradigm’ of health. Sociol Compass 2:268–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosca L, Banka CL, Benjamin EJ et al (2007) Evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women: 2007 update. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:1230–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K et al (2011) Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women—2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:1404–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS et al (2015) Heart disease and stroke statistics—2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 131:e29–e32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napier S (2011) Virtue epistemology: motivation and knowledge. Continuum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettleton S (1996) Women and the new paradigm of health and medicine. Crit Soc Pol 16:33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman GR, Eva KW (2010) Diagnostic error and clinical reasoning. Med Educ 44:94–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman G, Sherbino J, Dore K et al (2014) The etiology of diagnostic errors: a controlled trial of system 1 versus system 2 reasoning. Acad Med 89:277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne VL, Patel VL (2014) Enhancing medical decision making when caring for the critically ill: the role of cognitive heuristics and biases. In: Patel VL, Kaufman DR, Cohen T (eds) Cognitive informatics in health and biomedicine: case studies on critical care, complexity and errors. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC (1993) The virtues in medical practice. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilote L, Dasgupta K, Guru V et al (2007) A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease. CMAJ 176:S1–S44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Politi C, Ciarambino T, Franconi F et al (2013) Gender medicine: an up-date. Ital J Med 7:96–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risberg G (2004) “I am solely a professional—neutral and genderless”: on gender bias and gender awareness in the medical profession. Umeå University, Umeå

    Google Scholar 

  • Risberg G, Hamberg K, Johansson EE (2006) Gender perspective in medicine: a vital part of medical scientific rationality. A useful model for comprehending structures and hierarchies within medical science. BMC Med 4:20. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-4-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risberg G, Johansson EE, Hamberg K (2009) A theoretical model for analyzing gender bias in medicine. Int J Equity Health 8:28. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risberg G, Johansson EE, Hamberg K (2011) ‘Important… but of low status’: male education leaders’ views on gender in medicine. Med Educ 45:613–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts RC, Wood WJ (2007) Intellectual virtues: an essay in regulative epistemology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson RM (2001) Women and cardiovascular disease: the risks of misperception and the need for action. Circulation 103:2318–2320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz MT, Verbrugge LM (1997) A two way view of gender bias in medicine. J Epidemiol Common Health 51:106–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahni S, Fonarow GC (2014) Gender bias treads in implantable cardioverter–defibrillator therapy. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep 8:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab AP (2008) Epistemic trust, epistemic responsibility, and medical practice. J Med Philos 33:302–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab A (2011) Epistemic humility and medical practice: translating epistemic categories into ethical obligations. J Med Philos 37:28–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott KW, Jha AK (2014) Putting quality on the global health agenda. N Engl J Med 371:3–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen G, George A, Östlin P (eds) (2002) Engendering international health: the challenge of equity. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons A, Falbe J, Vacek J (2011) Coronary artery disease in women: a review and update. Rev Cardiovasc Med 12:e84–e93

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa E (1980) The raft and the pyramid: coherence versus foundations in the theory of knowledge. Midwest Stud Philos 5:3–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa E (2009) A virtue epistemology: apt belief and reflective knowledge, vol 1. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang W, Alter DA, Wijeysundera HC et al (2012) The impact of cardiovascular disease prevalence on women’s enrollment in landmark randomized cardiovascular trials: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 27:93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wijk CMG, Van Vliet KP, Kolk AM (1996) Gender perspectives and quality of care: towards appropriate and adequate health care for women. Soc Sci Med 43:707–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdonk P, Benschop YW, de Haes HC et al (2009) From gender bias to gender awareness in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 14:135–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton D (1999) One-sided arguments: a dialectical analysis of bias. SUNY Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger NK (2004) You.ve come a long way baby: cardiovascular health and disease in women: problems and prospects. Circulation 109:558–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger NK (2012) Women and coronary heart disease: a century after Herrick: understudied, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. Circulation 126:604–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong YL (2009) Review paper: gender competencies in the medical curriculum: addressing gender bias in medicine. Asia Pac J Public Health 21:359–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Heart Federation (2012) Women & cardiovascular disease. http://www.world-heart-federation.org/fileadmin/content/PressBackgrounderApril2012WomenCVD.pdf

  • Xhyheri B, Bugiardini R (2010) Diagnosis and treatment of heart disease: are women different from men? Prog Cardiovasc Dis 53:227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski LT (1996) Virtues of the mind: an inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zusterzeel R, Spatz ES, Curtis JP et al (2015) Cardiac resynchronization therapy in women versus men: observational comparative effectiveness study from the national cardiovascular data registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 8:S4–S11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A. Marcum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marcum, J.A. Clinical Decision-Making, Gender Bias, Virtue Epistemology, and Quality Healthcare. Topoi 36, 501–508 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9343-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9343-2

Keywords

Navigation