Abstract
This paper explores some of the consequences of quantum entanglement for the mainstream metaphysician. The basic idea that entanglement has metaphysical consequences in the form of some kind of “holism” is familiar in the philosophy of physics literature, and finds its way into recent metaphysics, in discussions of failure of Humean supervenience, monism and emergence, for example. The principle aim here is to highlight some questions of detail that occur when attempting to make contact with those metaphysical debates as they occur in the metaphysics literature-details that matter less when the aim is just to show that there is some novelty in entanglement, but more when articulating its precise nature. The conclusion is broadly that the differences are not as great as is sometimes supposed between entanglement and more familiar phenomena already accommodated in prominent metaphysical schemes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Thanks to Michael Esfeld in correspondence for this suggestion.
References
Butterfield J (1993) Interpretation and identity in quantum theory. Stud Hist Philos Sci 24(3):443–476
Cleland C (1984) Space: an abstract system of non-supervenient relations. Philos Stud 46(1):19–40
Darby G (2012) Relational holism and Humean supervenience. Br J Philos Sci 63(4):773–788
Divers J (2013) The analysis of possibility and the extent of possibility. Dialectica 67(2):183–200
Esfeld M (forthcoming) Quantum Humeanism, or: physicalism without properties. Philos Q
Esfeld M (2004) Quantum entanglement and a metaphysics of relations. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part B 35(4):601–617
French S (1989) Individuality, supervenience and Bell’s theorem. Philos Stud 55(1):1–22
French S, Krause D (2003) Quantum vagueness. Erkenntnis 59(1):97–124
French S, McKenzie K (2012) Thinking outside the (tool)box: towards a more productive engagement between metaphysics and philosophy of physics. Eur J Anal Philos 8(1):42–59
Hawley K (2010) Throwing the baby out with the bathwater: review of Ladyman and Ross. Metascience 19(2):174–178
Healey R (1991) Holism and nonseparability. J Philos 88(8):393–421
Humphreys P (1997) How properties emerge. Philos Sci 64(1):1–17
Kim J (2006) Emergence: core ideas and issues. Synthese 151(3):547–559
Ladyman J, Ross D, Collier J, Spurrett D (2007) Every thing must go: metaphysics naturalized. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lewis D (1986a) Philosophical papers, vol 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lewis D (1986b) On the plurality of worlds. Blackwell, Oxford
Maudlin T (2007) The metaphysics within physics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Mill JS (1882) A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive, 8th edn. Harper and Brothers, New York
Miller E (2014) Quantum entanglement, Bohmian mechanics, and Humean supervenience. Aust J Philos 92(3):567–583
Schaffer J (2010) Monism: the priority of the whole. Philos Rev 119(1):31
Teller P (1986) Relational holism and quantum mechanics. Br J Philos Sci 37(1):71–81
Teller P (1992) A contemporary look at emergence. In: Beckermann A, Flohr H, Kim J (eds) Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism. de Gruyter, Berlin
Acknowledgments
Thanks to participants at the 2014 Topoi conference on the metaphysics of quantum mechanics at Oxford, expecially Michael Esfeld, Daniel Kodaj, Anna Marmodoro, Tim Maudlin, Oliver Pooley and David Wallace, for comments and discussion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Darby, G. Entanglement and the Metaphysician on the Clapham Omnibus. Topoi 34, 387–396 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9299-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9299-2