Skip to main content
Log in

Philosophy: what is to be done?

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

If, as it is assumed here, philosophy is pervasive and continuous with non-philosophical disciplines, if consequently this dialogue is above all highly interdisciplinary, tends to align itself with the standards of scientific disciplines, and generates strongly contextualised and localised philosophical problems, and if a certain social role is part of the nature of philosophy, then we can expect in decades to come increasingly articulated and interesting interactions between philosophers and non-philosophers that will be manifested in new professional figures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Goldman A (1992) Metaphysics, Mind, and Mental Science, ch. 2 of Liaisons. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell M (ed) (1995) Brancusi contre Etats-Unis. Adam Biro, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson PF (1959) Individuals. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Casati.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Casati, R. Philosophy: what is to be done?. Topoi 25, 25–28 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-006-0003-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-006-0003-4

Keywords

Navigation