Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spacer length-dependent protection of specific activity of pollen and/or embryo promoters from influence of CaMV 35S promoter/enhancer in transgenic plants

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of the CaMV 35S promoter/enhancer on expression profiles of four Arabidopsis thaliana pollen- and/or embryo-specific promoters, APRS, ESL, MXL, and DLL, was tested in transgenic tobacco plants. Individual promoters were fused to the gus reporter gene and cloned in head-to-head orientation with the CaMV 35S:hpt expression unit within the same T-DNA. With the exception of the TATA-less promoter DLL, all other combinations generated interactions between the promoter under investigation and 35S promoter/enhancer resulting in ectopic β-glucuronidase (GUS) expression in vegetative organs and tissues, the most susceptible being the stem, followed by callus, leaf, and root. To eliminate this crosstalk, DNA spacers of length 1, 2 and 5 kb were cloned between the interacting sequences. Ectopic GUS staining was dependent on the affected promoter as well as the distance between the 5′-end of the CaMV 35S promoter and the reporter gene translation start site. When this distance was less than 1 kb strong ectopic GUS staining was observed in all vegetative tissues, similar to the CaMV35S:gus expression profile in transgenic tobacco plants. Insertion of spacer DNA sequences of increasing length resulted in gradual reduction of ectopic GUS staining in tested plants. Of the tissues and organs related to plant reproduction, only anthers and seed coats in the early stages of seed development showed ectopic GUS staining. Developing pollen and embryos showed a pattern of GUS activity consistent with the predicted role of a developmental stage-specific promoter in transgenic tobacco plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anish R, Hossain MB, Jacobson RH, Takada S (2009) Characterization of transcription from TATA-less promoters: identification of a new core promoter element XCPE2 and analysis of factor requirements. PLoS ONE 4(4):e5103. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005103

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Babitha KC, Ramu SV, Pruthvi V, Mahesh P, Nataraja KN, Udayakumar M (2013) Co-expression of AtbHLH17 and AtWRKY28 confers resistance to abiotic stress in Arabidopsis. Transgenic Res 22:327–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhsh A, Rao AQ, Shamim Z, Husnain T (2011) A minireview: Rubisco small subunit as a strong, green tissue-specific promoter. Arch Biol Sci 63:299–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrocal-Lobo M, Molina A, Solano R (2002) Constitutive expression of ethylene-response-factor1 in Arabidopsis confers resistance to several necrotrophic fungi. Plant J 29:23–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bevan M (1984) Binary Agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucleic Acids Res 12:8711–8721

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bondarenko VA, Liu YV, Jiang YI, Studitsky VM (2003) Communication over a large distance: enhancers and insulators. Biochem Cell Biol 81:241–251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling SA, Clarke JD, Liu YD, Klessig DF, Dong XN (1997) The cpr5 mutant of Arabidopsis expresses both NPR1-dependent and NPR1-independent resistance. Plant Cell 9:1573–1584

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler JEF, Kadonaga JT (2001) Enhancer–promoter specificity mediated by DPE or TATA core promoter motifs. Genes Dev 15:2515–2519

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cai HNN, Zhang ZG, Adams JR, Shen P (2001) Genomic context modulates insulator activity through promoter competition. Development 128:4339–4347

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casson S, Spencer M, Walker K, Lindsey K (2005) Laser capture microdissection for the analysis of gene expression during embryogenesis of Arabidopsis. Plant J 42:111–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal M, Chinnusamy V, Bansal KC (2010) Isolation and functional characterization of Lycopene beta-cyclase (CYC-B) promoter from Solanum habrochaites. BMC Plant Biol 10:61

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drea SC, Lao NT, Wolfe KH, Kavanagh TA (2006) Gene duplication, exon gain and neofunctionalization of OEP16-related genes in land plants. Plant J 46:723–735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grace ML, Chandrasekharan MB, Hall TC, Crowe AJ (2004) Sequence and spacing of TATA box elements are critical for accurate initiation from the beta-phaseolin promoter. J Biol Chem 279:8102–8110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gudynaite-Savitch L, Johnson DA, Miki BLA (2009) Strategies to mitigate transgene–promoter interactions. Plant Biotechnol J 7:472–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hajdukiewicz P, Svab Z, Maliga P (1994) The small, versatile pPZP family of agrobacterium binary vectors for plant transformation. Plant Mol Biol 25:989–994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hily JM, Singer SD, Yang YZ, Liu ZR (2009) A transformation booster sequence (TBS) from Petunia hybrida functions as an enhancer-blocking insulator in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep 28:1095–1104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirner B, Fischer WN, Rentsch D, Kwart M, Frommer WB (1998) Developmental control of H +/amino acid permease gene expression during seed development of Arabidopsis. Plant J 14:535–544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Höfgen R, Willmitzer L (1988) Storage of competent cells for Agrobacterium transformation. Nucleic Acids Res 16:9877

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogga I, Karch F (2002) Transcription through the iab-7 cis-regulatory domain of the bithorax complex interferes with maintenance of Polycomb-mediated silencing. Development 129:4915–4922

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Honys D, Twell D (2004) Transcriptome analysis of haploid male gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol 5:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honys D, Oh SA, Renak D, Donders M, Solcova B, Johnson JA, Boudova R, Twell D (2006) Identification of microspore-active promoters that allow targeted manipulation of gene expression at early stages of microgametogenesis in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol 6:31

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horsch RB, Fry JE, Hoffmann NL, Eichholtz D, Rogers SG, Fraley RT (1985) A simple and general-method for transferring genes into plants. Science 227:1229–1231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hraska M, Rakousky S, Curn V (2008) Tracking of the CaMV-35S promoter performance in GFP transgenic tobacco, with a special emphasis on flowers and reproductive organs, confirmed its predominant activity in vascular tissues. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 94:239–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jagannath A, Bandyopadhyay P, Arumugam N, Gupta V, Burma PK, Pental D (2001) The use of a spacer DNA fragment insulates the tissue-specific expression of a cytotoxic gene (barnase) and allows high-frequency generation of transgenic male sterile lines in Brassica juncea L. Mol Breed 8:11–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusions—beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher-plants. EMBO J 6:3901–3907

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jopcik M, Bauer M, Moravcikova J, Boszoradova E, Matusikova I, Libantova J (2013) Plant tissue-specific promoters can drive gene expression in Escherichia coli. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 113:387–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koltunow AM, Truettner J, Cox KH, Wallroth M, Goldberg RB (1990) Different temporal and spatial gene-expression patterns occur during anther development. Plant Cell 2:1201–1224

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Joshi SG, Bell AA, Rathore KS (2013) Enhanced resistance against Thielaviopsis basicola in transgenic cotton plants expressing Arabidopsis NPR1 gene. Transgenic Res 22:359–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin JC, Oppenheimer DG, Pollock S, Marks MD (1993) Arabidopsis GLABROUS1 gene requires downstream sequences for function. Plant Cell 5:1739–1748

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ling JH, Baibakov B, Pi WH, Emerson BM, Tuan D (2005) The HS2 enhancer of the beta-globin locus control region initiates synthesis of non-coding, polyadenylated RNAs independent of a cis-linked globin promoter. J Mol Biol 350:883–896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merkouropoulos G, Shirsat AH (2012) Histochemical map of the ectopic expression of the Arabidopsis atExt1 extension gene in transgenic tobacco. Genet Mol Res 11:1830–1840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcikova J, Libantova J, Matusikova I, Libiakova G, Nap JP, Mlynarova L (2003) Genetic transformation of Slovak cultivar of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.): efficiency and the behaviour of the transgene. Biologia 58:1075–1080

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcikova J, Libantova J, Heldak J, Salaj J, Bauer M, Matusikova I, Galova Z, Mlynarova L (2007) Stress-induced expression of cucumber chitinase and Nicotiana plumbaginifolia beta-1,3-glucanase genes in transgenic potato plants. Acta Physiol Plant 29:133–141

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odell JT, Hoopes JL, Vermerris W (1994) Seed-specific gene activation mediated by the Cre/lox site-specific recombination system. Plant Physiol 106:447–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ouwerkerk PBF, de Kam RJ, Hodge JHC, Meijer AH (2001) Glucocorticoid-inducible gene expression in rice. Planta 213:370–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peremarti A, Twyman RM, Gomez-Galera S, Naqvi S, Farre G, Sabalza M, Miralpeix B, Dashevskaya S, Yuan DW, Ramessar K, Christou P, Zhu CF, Bassie L, Capell T (2010) Promoter diversity in multigene transformation. Plant Mol Biol 73:363–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts CS, Rajagopal S, Smith LA, Nguyen TA, Yang W, Nugroho S, Ravi KS, Vijayachandra K, Harcourt KL, Dransfield L, Desamero N, Hajdukiewicz P, Svab Z, Maliga P, Mayer JE, Keese P, Kilian K, Jefferson RA (2002) A comprehensive set of modular vectors for advanced manipulations and efficient transformation of plants by both Agrobacterium and direct DNA uptake methods. CAMBIA, Canberra, Australia. http://www.cambia.org

  • Sakebe NJ, Savic D, Nobrega MA (2012) Transcriptional enhancers in development and disease. Genome Biol 13:238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savidge B, Rounsley SD, Yanofsky MF (1995) Temporal relationship between the transcription of 2 Arabidopsis MADS box genes and the floral organ identity genes. Plant Cell 7:721–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer SD, Hily JM, Liu ZR (2010) A 1-kb bacteriophage Lambda fragment functions as an insulator to effectively block enhancer–promoter interactions in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol Rep 28:69–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singer SD, Cox KD, Liu ZR (2011) Enhancer–promoter interference and its prevention in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep 30:723–731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith PA, Corces VG (1995) The suppressor of hairy-wing protein regulates the tissue-specific expression of the drosophila GYPSY retrotransposon. Genetics 139:215–228

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DL, Fedoroff NV (1995) LRP1, a gene expressed in lateral and adventitious root primordia of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 7:735–745

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stangeland B, Salehian Z (2002) An improved clearing method for GUS assay in Arabidopsis endosperm and seeds. Plant Mol Biol Rep 20:321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaculkova E, Moravcikova J, Matusikova I, Bauer M, Libantova J (2007) A modified low copy number binary vector pUN for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Biol Plant 51:538–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • vander Geest AHM, Hall TC (1997) The beta-phaseolin 5′ matrix attachment region acts as an enhancer facilitator. Plant Mol Biol 33:553–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson JE, Twell D, Lindsey K (1997) Activities of CaMV 35S and nos promoters in pollen: implications for field release of transgenic plants. J Exp Bot 48:265–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wisniewski M, Bassett C, Macarisin D, Norelli J, Artlip T, Korban S (2009) Transcriptomic and proteomic response of fruit trees to abiotic stress. In: Hanke MV, Dunemann F, Flachowsky H (eds) I international symposium on biotechnology of fruit species: Biotechfruit 2008, pp 681–687

  • Xiao YL, Redman JC, Monaghan EL, Zhuang J, Underwood BA, Moskal WA, Wang W, Wu HC, Town CD (2010) High throughput generation of promoter reporter (GFP) transgenic lines of low expressing genes in Arabidopsis and analysis of their expression patterns. Plant Methods 6:18 http://www.plantmethods.com/content/6/1/18

  • Yoo SY, Bomblies K, Yoo SK, Yang JW, Choi MS, Lee JS, Weigel D, Ahn JH (2005) The 35S promoter used in a selectable marker gene of a plant transformation vector affects the expression of the transgene. Planta 221:523–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng XL, Deng W, Luo KM, Duan H, Chen YQ, McAvoy R, Song SQ, Pei Y, Li Y (2007) The cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter sequence alters the level and patterns of activity of adjacent tissue- and organ-specific gene promoters. Plant Cell Rep 26:1195–1203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Slovak Grant Agency VEGA Project No. 2/0090/14. The authors also thank Dr. Jan Miernyk and Miroslav Bauer for helpful comments and corrections.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Plant Genetics and Biotechnology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 39A, 950 07, Nitra 1, Slovak Republic

    Martin Jopcik, Jana Moravcikova, Ildiko Matusikova & Jana Libantova

Authors
  1. Martin Jopcik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jana Moravcikova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ildiko Matusikova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jana Libantova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jana Libantova.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jopcik, M., Moravcikova, J., Matusikova, I. et al. Spacer length-dependent protection of specific activity of pollen and/or embryo promoters from influence of CaMV 35S promoter/enhancer in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 118, 507–518 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-014-0503-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-014-0503-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation