Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Norms and rationality. Is moral behavior a form of rational action?

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article addresses major arguments in the controversy about the “rationality” of moral behavior: can moral behavior be explained by rational choice theory (RCT)? The two positions discussed are the incentives thesis (norms are incentives as any other costs and benefits) and the autonomy thesis claiming that moral behavior has nothing to do with utility. The article analyses arguments for the autonomy thesis by J. Elster, A. Etzioni, and J. G. March and J. P. Olsen. Finally, the general claim is discussed whether norm following and norm emergence are utility maximizing. The conclusion is that the autonomy thesis is not tenable if one applies a wide subjectivist, social psychological version of RCT that includes the assumption of “bounded rationality.” The autonomy thesis is only compatible with a narrow version of RCT that excludes internal outcomes and that refers to norms that do not have external outcomes. It is argued that such a narrow version is not capable of explaining many forms of behavior social scientists are interested in.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarts H., Dijksterhuis A. (2000) Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78(1): 53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aarts H., Dijksterhuis A., Custers R. (2003) Automatic normative behavior in environments: The moderating role of conformity in activating situational norms. Social Cognition 21(6): 447–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan L. G., Jenkins H. M. (1980) The judgment of contingency and the nature of the response alternatives. Canadian Journal of Psychology 34(1): 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony D., Smith S. W., Williamson T. (2009) Reputation and reliability in collective goods. The case of the online encyclopedia WIKIPEDIA. Rationality & Society 21(3): 283–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock L., Loewenstein G. (1997) Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(1): 109–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A. (1986) Social foundations of thought and action. A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh J. A., Gollwitzer P. M., Lee-Chai A., Barndollar K. (2001) The automated will: Non-conscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(6): 1014–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh J. A., Morsella E. (2008) The unconscious mind. perspectives on Psychological Science 3(1): 73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. [1982 (first 1789)]. In J. H. Burns & H. L. A Hart (Eds.), An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. London: Methuen.

  • Bohman J. (1992) The limits of rational choice explanation. In: Coleman J. S., Fararo T. J. (eds) Rational choice theory. Advocacy and critique. SAGE, Newbury Park, pp 207–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon R. (1996) The ’cognitivist model.’ A generalized ’rational-choice-model’. Rationality and Society 8(2): 123–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R., Richerson P. J. (2005) The origin and evolution of culture. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen R. (2009) Game theory. In: Hedström P., Bearman P. (eds) The oxford handbook of analytical sociology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 619–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan G., Buchanan J. M. (1985) The reason of rules. Constitutional political economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan T. J. (1989) A methodological assessment of multiple utility frameworks. Economics and Philosophy 5(2): 189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown R. (1965) Social psychology. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken S., Trope Y. (1999) Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman J. S. (1990) Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci E. L., Koestner R., Ryan R. M. (1999) A meta-analytic review of experiments examining effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin 125: 627–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz H. (1967) Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review 57(2): 347–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson R. C. (1991) Order without law. How neighbors settle disputes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. (1989) Social norms and economic theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3: 99–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. (1989) The cement of society. A study of social order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. (1990) Norms of revenge. Ethics 100(4): 862–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. (1991) Rationality and social norms. Archives Européennes de Sociologie 32(1): 109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser H. (1999) Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Band 1: Situationslogik und Handeln. Campus, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser H. (2001) Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Band 6: Sinn und Kultur. Campus, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni A. (1986) The case for a multiple-utility conception. Economics and Philosophy 2: 159–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni A. (1988) The moral dimension. Toward a new economics. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk A., Gächter S., Kovács J. (1999) Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives in a repeated game with incomplete contracts. Journal of Economic Psychology 20(3): 251–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio R. H. (1990) Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The mode model as an integrative framework. In: Zanna M. P. (ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 75–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio R. H., Towles-Schwen T. (1999) The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In: Chaiken S., Trope Y. (eds) Dual process theories in social psychology. Guilford, New York, pp 97–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E., Falk A. (2002) Psychological foundations of incentives. European Economic Review 46(4–5): 687–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E., Fischbacher U. (2003) The nature of human altruism. Nature 425: 785–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E., Fischbacher U., Gächter S. (2002) Strong reciprocity, human cooperation and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature 13(1): 1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E., Gächter S. (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review 90(4): 980–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E., Gächter S. (2000) Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3): 159–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E., Gintis H. (2007) Human motivation and social cooperation: Experimental and analytical foundations. Annual Review of Sociology 33: 43–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger L. (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel S. E. (2008) In defense of the “wide” rational choice model of collective political action. In: Diekman A., Eichner K., Schmidt P., Voss T. (eds) Rational Choice: Theoretische Analysen und empirische Befunde [Rational Choice. Theoretical Analyses and Empirical Findings]. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 23–36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frey B. S. (1999) Economics as a science of human behaviour. Towards a new social science paradigm (second extended edition). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frey B. S., Jegen R. (2001) Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys 15(5): 589–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grusec, J. E., Hastings, P. E. (eds) (2007) Handbook of socialization: Theory and research. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamlin A. P. (1991) Rational revenge. Ethics 101(2): 374–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F. A. (1973) Law, legislation and liberty. Vol. 1: Rules and order. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, M., Opp, K.-D. (eds) (2001) Social norms. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn D. (1988) Collective sanctions and the creation of prisoner’s dilemma norms. American Journal of Sociology 94: 535–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn D. D. (1990) Modelling the second-order free-rider problem: Reply to Oliver. Rationality and Society 2(1): 123–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel C. G. (1952) Fundamentals of concept formation in empirical science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H. (eds) (2004) Foundations of human sociality. Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Herne K., Setälä M. (2004) A response to the critique of rational choice theory: Lakatos’ and Laudan’s conceptions applied. Inquiry 47(1): 67–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman A. O. (1977) The passions and the interests. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman A. O. (1984) Against parsimony: Three easy ways of complicating some categories of economic discourse. The American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Sixth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association) 74(2): 89–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne C. (2009) The rewards of punishment. A relational theory of norm enforcement. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan J. (1987) Introduction. In: Kagan J., Lamb S. (eds) The emergence of morality in young children. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J., Lamb, S. (eds) (1987) The emergence of morality in young children. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (eds) (2000) Choices, values and frames. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroneberg C., Yaish M., Stocké V. (2010) Norms and rationality in electoral participation and in the rescue of Jews in WWII: An application of the model of frame selection. Rationality & Society 22(1): 3–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little D. (1991) Varieties of social explanation. An introduction to the philosophy of social science. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons B. (1992) Game theory. In: Heap S. H., Hollis M., Lyons B., Sugden R., Weale A. (eds) The theory of choice. A critical guide. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 93–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney J. (2000) Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society 29(4): 507–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March J. G., Olsen J. P. (1989) Rediscovering institutions. The organizational basis of politics. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • March J. G., Olsen J. P. (2006) The logic of appopriateness. In: Moran M., Rein M., Goodin R. E. (eds) The Oxford handbook of public policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 689–709

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehlkop G., Graeff P. (2010) Modelling a rational choice theory of criminal action: Subjective expected utilities, norms, and interaction. Rationality & Society 22(2): 189–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monroe K. R. (2004) The hand of compassion. Portraits of moral choice during the Holocaust. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe K. R., Barton M. C., Klingemann U. (1991) Altruism and the theory of rational action: An analysis of rescuers of Jews in Nazi-Europe. In: Monroe K. R. (ed.) The economic approach to politics. A critical reassessment of the theory of rational action. HarperCollins, New York, pp 317–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Mühler K. (2005) Sozialisation, Konfliktwahrnehmung und regionale Identifikation. In: Fach W., Luutz W. (eds) Region und Vision: Regionalprogramme im Vergleich. Leipziger Universitätsverlag, Leipzig, pp 193–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson-Yaouzis N. (2010) Revolutionaries, despots, and rationality. Rationality & Society 22(3): 283–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opp K.-D. (1997) Can identity theory better explain the rescue of Jews in Nazi Europe than rational actor theory?. Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change 20: 223–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp K.-D. (1999) Contending conceptions of the theory of rational action. Journal of Theoretical Politics 11(2): 171–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opp K.-D. (2001) Norms. In: Smelser N. J., Baltes P. B. (eds) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 10714–10720

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Osman M. (2004) An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11(6): 988–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E. (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker W. H., Ordeshook P. C. (1968) A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review 65: 25–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riker W. H., Ordeshook P. C. (1973) An introduction to positive political theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Rommetveit R. (1954) Social norms and roles. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. A. (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Society 2(1): 125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark R. (2007) Sociology, 10th ed. Thomson, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe W. (2008) Warum und wie beeinflussen Normen das Verhalten: Eine sozial-kognitive Analyse. In: Diekman A., Eichner K., Schmidt P., Voss T. (eds) Rational Choice: Theoretische Analysen und empirische Resultate. Festschrift für Karl-Dieter Opp zum 70. Geburtstag. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 101–118

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler T. R. (1990) Why people obey the law. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Udéhn L. (1996) The limits of public choice. A sociological critique of the economic theory of politics. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg V. (2002) Rational choice vs. program-based behavior: Alternative theoretical approaches and their relevance for the study of institutions. Rationality & Society 14(1): 7–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg V. (2009) Rationalität, Regelbefolgung und Emotionen: Zur Ökonomik moralischer Präferenzen. In: Tscheulin D. K., Schüpbach H. (eds) Verhaltenswissenschaftliche Grundlagen in ökonomischen Systemen. BWV—Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, Berlin, pp 46–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Varese F., Yaish M. (2000) The importance of being asked: The rescue of Jews in Nazi Europe. Rationality and Society 12(3): 307–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee A. S. (1997) Thick rationality and the missing “brute fact”: The limits of rationalist incorporations of norms and ideas: Rejoinder. The Journal of Politics 59(4): 1048–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Leipzig, Hamburg, Germany

    Karl-Dieter Opp

Authors
  1. Karl-Dieter Opp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl-Dieter Opp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Opp, KD. Norms and rationality. Is moral behavior a form of rational action?. Theory Decis 74, 383–409 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9315-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9315-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation