Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is more health always better for society? Exploring public preferences that violate monotonicity

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has recently been some literature on the properties of a Health-Related Social Welfare Function (HRSWF). The aim of this article is to contribute to the analysis of the different properties of a HRSWF, paying particular attention to the monotonicity principle. For monotonicity to be fulfilled, any increase in individual health—other things equal—should result in an increase in social welfare. We elicit public preferences concerning trade-offs between the total level of health (concern for efficiency) and its distribution (concern for equality), under different hypothetical scenarios through face-to-face interviews. Of key interests are: the distinction between non-monotonic preferences and Rawlsian preferences; symmetry of HRSWF; and the extent of inequality neutral preferences. The results indicate strong support for non-monotonic preferences, over Rawlsian preferences. Furthermore, the majority of those surveyed had preferences that were consistent with a symmetric and inequality averse HRSWF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abásolo I., Tsuchiya A. (2004) Exploring social welfare functions and violation of monotonicity: an example from inequalities in health. Journal of Health Economics 23(2): 313–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abásolo I., Tsuchiya A. (2008) Understanding preference for egalitarian policies in health: Are age and sex determinants?. Applied Economics 40(19): 2451–2461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan P. (1998) The measurement of individual utility and social welfare. Journal of Health Economics 17: 39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan P., Tsuchiya A. (2005) Health priorities and public preferences: The relative importance of past health experience and future health prospects. Journal of Health Economics 24: 703–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan P., Tsuchiya A. (2011) Determining the parameters in a social welfare functions using stated preference data: An application to health. Applied Economics 43(18): 2241–2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta I. (2006a) Health inequality and non-monotonicity of the health related social welfare function. Journal of Health Economics 26: 414–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta I. (2006b) Health inequality and non-monotonicity of the health related social welfare function: A rejoinder. Journal of Health Economics 26: 426–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krosnik J.A. (1999) Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology 50: 537–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen J.A. (2004) Exploring social welfare functions and violation of monotonicity: an example from inequalities in health—a comment. Journal of Health Economics 23: 331–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohatgi V.K. (1976) An introduction to probability theory and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scripture E.W. (1897) The New Psychology. W Scott, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R., Dolan, P., Tsuchiya, A., Williams, A., Smith, P., & Burrows, R. (2001). Development of a questionnaire to elicit people’s preferences regarding health inequalities, Occasional Paper. Centre for Health Economics, University of York.

  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4): 1039–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff, A. (1994). QALYs and the equity–efficiency trade-off. In A. Layard & S. Glaister (Eds.), Cost-benefit analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (reprinted from Journal of Health Economics 10 (1991) 21–41, with corrections).

  • Williams A. (1997) Intergenerational equity: An exploration of the fair innings argument. Health Economics 6: 117–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aki Tsuchiya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abásolo, I., Tsuchiya, A. Is more health always better for society? Exploring public preferences that violate monotonicity. Theory Decis 74, 539–563 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9292-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9292-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation