Skip to main content
Log in

Mixed risk aversion and preference for risk disaggregation: a story of moments

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a recent article entitled “Putting Risk in its Proper Place,” Eeckhoudt and Schlesinger (2006) established a theorem linking the sign of the n-th derivative of an agent’s utility function to her preferences among pairs of simple lotteries. We characterize these lotteries and show that, in a given pair, they only differ by their moments of order greater than or equal to n. When the n-th derivative of the utility function is positive (negative) and n is odd (even), the agent prefers a lottery with higher (lower) n + 2p-th moments for p belonging to the set of positive integers. This result links the preference for disaggregation of risks across states of nature to the complete structure of moments preferred by mixed risk averse agents. It can be viewed as a generalization of a proposition appearing in Ekern (1980) which focused only on the differences in the n-th moments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brockett P. L., Kahane Y. (1992) Risk, return, skewness and preference. Management Science 38(6): 851–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballé J., Pomansky A. (1996) Mixed risk aversion. Journal of Economic Theory 71(2): 485–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, W. H. (2008). Skewness preference, risk taking and expected utility maximization. Working Paper. University of Manchester.

  • Deck, C. A., & Schlesinger, H. (2008). Exploring higher-order risk effects. CESifo Working Paper Series 2487 (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1313032).

  • Eeckhoudt L., Gollier C., Schneider T. (1995) Risk-aversion, prudence and temperance: A unified approach. Economics Letters 48(3–4): 331–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt L., Schlesinger H. (2006) Putting risk in its proper place. American Economic Review 96: 280–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekern S. (1980) Increasing N-th degree risk. Economics Letters 6: 329–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball M. S. (1990) Precautionary savings in the small and in the large. Econometrica 58: 53–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball M. S. (1992). Precautionary motives for holding assets. In: Newman P., Milgate M., Falwell J. (Eds) New Palgrave dictionary of money and finance (Vol. 3). London, MacMillan, pp 158–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball M. S. (1993) Standard risk aversion. Econometrica 61(3): 589–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajeri-Chaherli F. (2004) Proper prudence, standard prudence and precautionary vulnerability. Economic Letters 82: 29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes C., Geiss C., Tressler J. (1980) Increasing downside risk. American Economic Review 70: 921–932

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Roger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roger, P. Mixed risk aversion and preference for risk disaggregation: a story of moments. Theory Decis 70, 27–44 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-009-9176-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-009-9176-9

Keywords

Navigation