Skip to main content
Log in

Are More Alternatives Better for Decision-Makers? A Note on the Role of Decision Cost

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the traditional economic wisdom believes that an individual will become better off by being given a larger opportunity set to choose from, in this paper we question this belief and build a formal theoretical model that introduces decision costs into the rational decision process. We show, under some reasonable conditions, that a larger feasible set may actually lower an individual’s level of satisfaction. This provides a solid economic underpinning for the Simon prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • W. Baumol R. Quandt (1964) ArticleTitleRules of thumb and optimally imperfect decisions American Economic Review 54 23–46

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Conlisk (1988) ArticleTitleOptimization cost Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 9 213–228 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0167-2681(88)90034-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Conlisk (1996) ArticleTitleWhy bounded rationality? Journal of Economic Literature 34 669–700

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hardar W. Russell (1969) ArticleTitleRules for ordering uncertain prospects American Economic Review 59 25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Conlisk (1988) ArticleTitleOptimization cost Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 9 213–228 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0167-2681(88)90034-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.L Lipman (1991) ArticleTitleHow to decide how to decide how to: modeling limited rationality Econometrica 59 1105–1125. Occurrence HandleMR1113548

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • M. Pingle (1992) ArticleTitleCostly optimization: an experiment Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 17(1) 3–30 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0167-2681(92)90077-O

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H.A. Simon (1955) ArticleTitleA behavioral model of rational choice Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 99–118

    Google Scholar 

  • V.L Smith (1989) ArticleTitleTheory, experiment, and economics Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 151–169

    Google Scholar 

  • N Takahashi S. Takayanagi (1985) ArticleTitleDecision procedure models and empirical research: the Japanese experience Human Relations 38 767–780

    Google Scholar 

  • N.T Wilcox (1993) ArticleTitleLottery choice: incentives, complexity and decision time Economic Journal 103 1397–1417

    Google Scholar 

  • E.E. Williams M.C. Findlay (1981) ArticleTitleA reconsideration of the rationality postulate: ’right hemisphere thinking’ in economics American Journal of Economics and Sociology 40 17–36

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juin-Jen Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, HC., Chen, M. & Chang, JJ. Are More Alternatives Better for Decision-Makers? A Note on the Role of Decision Cost. Theor Decis 58, 283–304 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-005-5063-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-005-5063-1

Key words

JEL CLASSIFICATIONS

Navigation