Abstract
Lately software based virtual mobile voice over Internet Protocol (VMVoIP) services have become available to end-users which may endanger profit of regular telephone operators from phone calls. In this situation, telephone operators should decide on a proper mechanism for interconnection with such VMVoIP operators which secures mutual benefit of both operators. In this paper, we study both monopolistic and oligopolistic markets of VMVoIP in which a single VMVoIP and several VMVoIP operators available in the market respectively. We model the interaction among a phone operator, VMVoIP operators and end-users as a leader-follower dynamic game and find a sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium (SPNE) for the game. The SPNE shows the phone operator’s best pricing strategy (i.e., wholesale price for VMVoIP operators and retail price for end-users) and its best decision on the interconnection with VMVoIP operators. We further study economic interpretation of the SPNE. We show that in specific end-users’ demands, the phone operator may increase its total profit by allowing the interconnection and taking right price discrimination strategy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sen, S., Joe-Wong, C., Ha, S., & Chiang, M. (2013). A survey of smart data pricing: Past proposals, current plans, and future trends. ACM Computing Surveys, 46(2), 15:1–15:37.
Varshney, U., Snow, A., McGivern, M., & Howard, C. (2002). Voice over IP. Communications of the ACM, 45(1), 89–96.
Clarke, R. N. (2012). The case for reforming regulation of PSTN voice services. Journal of Information Policy, 2, 287–313.
Verkasalo, H. (2006). Emerging trends in the Mobile VoIP business. In Seminar on networking business, Helsinki University of Technology.
Del Bianco, M. C. (2005). Voices past: The present and future of VoIP regulation. CommLaw Conspectus, 14, 365–401.
Rao, S. S. (2008). Internet telephony in India. Telematics and Informatics, 25(2), 57–71.
Skype. http://www.skype.com/en/. Accessed March 2016.
Viber. https://www.viber.com/. Accessed March 2016.
Hangouts. https://hangouts.google.com/. Accessed March 2016.
Azfar, A., Choo, K.-K. R., & Liu, L. (2014). A study of ten popular Android mobile VoIP applications: Are the communications encrypted? In 2014 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), (pp. 4858–4867). IEEE.
Kruse, J. (2008). Network neutrality and quality of service. Intereconomics, 43(1), 25–30.
Brock, G. W. (2006). Interconnection policy and technological progress. Federal Communications Law Journal, 58, 445–453.
Cannon, R. (2004). State regulatory approaches to VoIP: Policy, implementation, and outcome. Federal Communications Law Journal, 57, 479–510.
Landsburg, S. (2013). Price theory and applications. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Li, S., & Huang, J. (2014). Price differentiation for communication networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 22(3), 703–716.
Shakkottai, S., Srikant, R., Ozdaglar, A., & Acemoglu, D. (2008). The price of simplicity. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 26(7), 1269–1276.
Odlyzko, A. (2003). Privacy, economics, and price discrimination on the Internet. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on electronic commerce, (pp. 355–366). ACM.
Sthmeier, T. (2010). Fixed to VoIP interconnection: Regulation with asymmetric termination costs. In 21st European regional ITS conference, Copenhagen, (pp. 1–33).
de Bijl, P. W., & Peitz, M. (2009). Access regulation and the adoption of VoIP. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 35(2), 111–134.
Mfupe, L., Mzyece, M., & Kurien, A. (2009). A tele-economic approach for MNOs and software based M-VoIP operators to co-exist using game theory. In Proceedings of International Conference on Southern African telecommunication networks and applications (SATNAC), (pp. 1–5).
Datta, B., & Lo, Y.-S. (2013). To block or not to block? Network competition when Skype enters the mobile market. Discussion Papers, Department of Economics, University of York (pp. 1–25).
Li, Y.-M., & Chiu, S.-W. (2012). VoIP pricing in competitive telephony markets. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on electronic commerce, ICEC ’11, (pp. 25:1–25:5). ACM.
Sognnes, J. P. (2012). Versioning in the Norwegian telecommunications market: Limiting mVoIP access. Master’s thesis, Norwegian School of Economics.
Xu, X., & Chen, R. (2015). Competition, cooperation, and pricing: How mobile operators respond to the challenge of over-the-top. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 7(6), 1–13.
Huang, J., & Gao, L. (2013). Wireless network pricing. Synthesis Lectures on Communication Networks, 6(2), 100–101.
Nadav, U., & Piliouras, G. (2010). No regret learning in oligopolies: Cournot vs. bertrand. In Algorithmic game theory, (pp. 300–311). Springer.
de la Iglesia, J. L. M., & Gayo, J. E. L. (2009). Doing business by selling free services. In Web 2.0, (pp. 1–14). Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asghari, M., Yousefi, S. Pricing mechanism for interconnection between phone operators and virtual mobile VoIP operators. Telecommun Syst 67, 133–147 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-017-0326-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-017-0326-z