Skip to main content
Log in

Cooperative HARQ protocols using semi-blind relays for underlay cognitive radio networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we evaluate the throughput of cooperative ARQ and HARQ I protocols in underlay cognitive radio networks using semi blind relays. Semi Blind Relays do not require to estimate the channel of the first hop, they use only some channel statistics. Relays help the secondary source to deliver its packet. Only relays that generate an interference to primary receiver lower than a predefined threshold will be activated. Three relay selection techniques are considered: opportunistic relaying, partial and reactive relay selection. Opportunistic relaying consists in selecting the relay that offers the highest end-to-end SNR. Partial relay selection consists in selecting the relay that offers the highest SNR of the first hop. Reactive relay selection consists in selecting the relay that offers the highest SNR of the second hop. This relay is selected among the active ones that generate an interference to primary receiver lower than a predefined threshold. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies dealing with throughput evaluation of HARQ protocols for cognitive radio networks using opportunistic relaying, partial and reactive relay selection. Besides, this is the first paper to deal with HARQ protocols using semi blind relays. Previous studies dealt with outage, bit and symbol error probabilities evaluation for cognitive radio networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This Project was funded by the National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH), King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Award Number (11-ELE-1914-02).

References

  1. Hasna, M. O., & Alouini, M. S. (2003). End-to-end performance of transmission systems with relays over rayleigh fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2, 1126–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hasna, M., & Alouini, M. S. (2004). A performance study of dual hop transmissions with fixed gain relays. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 3(6), 1963–1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sadek, A. K., Su, W., & Ray Liu, K. J. (2007). Multinode cooperative communications in wireless Networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 55(1), 341–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anghel, P. A., & Kaveh, M. (2004). Exact symbol error probability of a cooperative network in a Rayleigh fading environnement. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 3(5), 1416–1421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsiftsis, T. A., Karagiannidis, G. K., Kotsopoulos, S. A., & Pavlidou, F. N. (2004). BER analysis of collaborative dual-hop wireless transmissions. Electronics Letters, 40(11), 679–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ikki, S., & Ahmed, M. H. (2007). Performance of cooperative diversity wireless networks over Nakagami-\(m\) fading channel. IEEE Communications Letters, 11(4), 334–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, I. H., & Kim, D. (2007). BER analysis for Decode and Forward relaying in dissimilar Rayleigh fading channels. IEEE Communication Letters, 11(1), 52–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barua, B., Ngo, H., & Shin, H. (2008). On the sep of cooperative diversity with opportunistic relaying. IEEE Communication Letters, 12(10), 727–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. FCC. (2002). Spectrum policy task force. Technical report. Washington, DC: FCC.

  10. Haykin, S. (2005). Cognitive radio: Brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23, 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Menon, R., Buehrer, R., & Reed, J. (2005). Outage probability based comparison of underlay and overlay spectrum sharing techniques. In IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

  12. Hussain, S. I., Alouini, M. S., Qaraqe, K., & Hasna, M. (2012). Reactive relay selection in underlay cognitive networks with fixed gain relays. In IEEE ICC.

  13. Hussain, S. I., Alouini, M. S., Qaraqe, K., & Hasna, M. (2012). Partial relay selection in underlay cognitive radio networks with fixed gain relays. In IEEE VTC Spring.

  14. Wang, X., Ji, Y., & Li, J. (2015). Cooperative ARQ retransmission based spectrum leasing for cognitiveradio networks. In 2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring) (pp. 1–6).

  15. Seifali Harsini, J., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Transmission strategy design in cognitive radio systems with primary ARQ control and QoS provisioning. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 62(6), 1790–1802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Joda, R., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Centralized access policy design for two cognitive secondary users under a primary ARQ process. In IEEE international conference on communications workshops (ICC) (pp. 268 –273).

  17. Wang, X., Ji, Y., & Li, J. (2014). Cooperative coding based retransmission protocol for cognitive radio networks by exploiting hybrid ARQ. In IEEE international wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC) (pp. 399–404).

  18. Boujemaa, H. (2010). Performance of truncated hybrid ARQ schemes with noisy feedback for DS-CDMA systems. European Transactions on Telecommunications, 21, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Boujemaa, H. (2010). Exact symbol error probability of cooperative systems with partial relay selection. European Transactions on Telecommunications, 21, 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Krikidis, I., Thompson, J., McLaughlin, S., & Goertz, N. (2008). Amplify and forward with partial relay selection. IEEE Communications Letters, 12(4), 235–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kallel, S. (1990). Analysis of a type-II hybrid ARQ scheme with code combining. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 38(8), 1133–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Boujemaa, H. (2009). Delay analysis of cooperative truncated HARQ with opportunistic relaying. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(9), 4795–4804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Boujemaa, H., Ben Said, M., & Siala, M. (2005, Dec). Throughput performance of ARQ and HARQ I schemes over a two-states Markov channel model. In IEEE international conference on electronics, circuits and systems, Gammarth (pp. 11–14).

  24. Proakis, J. G. (1995). Digital communications (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Malkamaki, E., & Leib, H. (2000). Evaluating of truncated type-II hybrid ARQ schemes with noisy feedback over block fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 48(9), 1477–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Leung, Y. S., Wilson, S. G., & Ketchung, J. W. (1993). Multi-frequency trellis coding with low delay for fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 41(10), 1450–1459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang, X., Phamdo, N., & Ping, L. (2001). Recursive method for generating weight enumerating functions of trellis codes. Electronics Letters, 37(12), 773–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sami Touati.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Touati, S., Boujemaa, H., Al Hussain, M.A. et al. Cooperative HARQ protocols using semi-blind relays for underlay cognitive radio networks. Telecommun Syst 63, 287–295 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-015-0120-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-015-0120-8

Keywords

Navigation