Skip to main content
Log in

Differential-geometric aspects of a nonholonomic Dirac mechanics: Lessons of a model quadratic in velocities

  • Published:
Theoretical and Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Faddeev and Vershik proposed the Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formulations of constrained mechanical systems that are invariant from the differential geometry standpoint. In both formulations, the description is based on a nondegenerate symplectic 2-form defined on a cotangent bundle T*Q (in the Hamiltonian formulation) or on a tangent bundle TQ (in the Lagrangian formulation), and constraints are sets of functions in involution on these manifolds. We demonstrate that this technique does not allow “invariantization” of the Dirac procedure of constraint “proliferation.” We show this in an example of a typical quantum field model in which the original Lagrange function is a quadratic form in velocities with a degenerate coefficient matrix. We postulate that the initial phase space is a manifold where all arguments of the action functional including the Lagrange multipliers are defined. The Lagrange multipliers can then be naturally interpreted physically as velocities (in the Hamiltonian formulation) or momenta (in the Lagrangian formulation) related to “nonphysical” degrees of freedom. A quasisymplectic 2-form invariantly defined on such a manifold is degenerate. We propose new differential-geometric structures that allow formulating the Dirac procedure invariantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. D. Faddeev, Theor. Math. Phys., 1, 1–13 (1969).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. V. I. Arnol’d, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1989); English transl. (Grad. Texts in Math., Vol. 60), Springer, New York (1989).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. A. M. Vershik and L. D. Faddeev, Sov. Phys. Dokl., 17, 34–36 (1972).

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. M. Vershik and L. D. Faddeev, Selecta Math. Sov., 1, 339–350 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. M. Vershik, “Mathematics of nonholonomicity,” in: The Thermodynamic Approach to Market (D. A. Leites, ed.) (Preprint No. 76), Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik, Leipzig (2006), pp. 137–154; arXiv:0803.3432v1 [physics.soc-ph] (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Godbillon, Géométrie différentielle et mécanique analytique, Hermann, Paris (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, 246, 326–332 (1958).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. V. P. Pavlov and A. O. Starinetz, Theor. Math. Phys., 105, 1539–1545 (1995).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. V. P. Pavlov, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 228, 135–144 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. P. Pavlov, Nonholonomic Dirac Mechanics and Differential Geometry [in Russian], MIAN Publ., Moscow (2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. P. Pavlov.

Additional information

__________

Translated from Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika, Vol. 178, No. 3, pp. 403–415, March, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pavlov, V.P. Differential-geometric aspects of a nonholonomic Dirac mechanics: Lessons of a model quadratic in velocities. Theor Math Phys 178, 347–358 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-014-0147-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-014-0147-0

Keywords

Navigation