Do computer simulations support the Argument from Disagreement?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
According to the Argument from Disagreement (AD) widespread and persistent disagreement on ethical issues indicates that our moral opinions are not influenced by moral facts, either because there are no such facts or because there are such facts but they fail to influence our moral opinions. In an innovative paper, Gustafsson and Peterson (Synthese, published online 16 October, 2010) study the argument by means of computer simulation of opinion dynamics, relying on the well-known model of Hegselmann and Krause (J Artif Soc Soc Simul 5(3):1–33, 2002; J Artif Soc Soc Simul 9(3):1–28, 2006). Their simulations indicate that if our moral opinions were influenced at least slightly by moral facts, we would quickly have reached consensus, even if our moral opinions were also affected by additional factors such as false authorities, external political shifts and random processes. Gustafsson and Peterson conclude that since no such consensus has been reached in real life, the simulation gives us increased reason to take seriously the AD. Our main claim in this paper is that these results are not as robust as Gustafsson and Peterson seem to think they are. If we run similar simulations in the alternative Laputa simulation environment developed by Angere and Olsson (Angere, Synthese, forthcoming and Olsson, Episteme 8(2):127–143, 2011) considerably less support for the AD is forthcoming.
- Angere, S. (forthcoming). Knowledge in a social network. Synthese.
- Boyd R. N. (1988) How to be a moral realist. In: Sayre-McCord G. (ed) Essays on moral realism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 181–228
- Brink D. O. (1989) Moral realism and the foundations of ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRef
- Doris, J., & Stich, S. (2006). Moral psychology: Empirical approaches. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
- Douven I., Kelp C. (2011) Truth approximation, social epistemology, and opinion dynamics. Erkenntnis 75(2): 271–283 CrossRef
- Gustafsson, J. E., & Peterson, M. (2010). A computer simulation of the argument from disagreement. Synthese, published online 16 October.
- Hegselmann R., Krause U. (2002) Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5(3): 1–33
- Hegselmann R., Krause U. (2006) Truth and cognitive division of labour: First steps towards a computer aided social epistemology. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 9(3): 1–28
- Isenberg D. (1986) Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(6): 1141–1151 CrossRef
- Jelen T., Wilcox C. (2003) Causes and consequences of public attitudes toward abortion: A review and research agenda. Political Research Quarterly 56(4): 489–500
- Mackie J. L. (1977) Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. Penguin, Harmondsworth
- Martini C. (2012) Consensus formation in networked groups. In: Hartmann S., Okasha S. (eds) EPSA philosophy of science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 199–215 CrossRef
- Olsson E. J. (2008) Knowledge, truth, and bullshit: Reflections on Frankfurt. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 32: 94–110 CrossRef
- Olsson E. J. (2011) A simulation approach to veritistic social epistemology. Episteme 8(2): 127–143 CrossRef
- Olsson, E. J. (forthcoming). Is polarization rational? A Bayesian simulation model of group deliberation.
- Olsson, E. J., & Vallinder, A. (forthcoming). Norms of assertion and communication in social networks. Synthese.
- Shafer-Landau R. (2003) Moral realism: A defence. Oxford University Press, Oxford CrossRef
- Zollman, K. (forthcoming). Social network structure and the achievement of consensus. Politics, Philosophy and Economics.
- Do computer simulations support the Argument from Disagreement?
Volume 190, Issue 8 , pp 1437-1454
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Argument from Disagreement
- Computer simulation
- Formal epistemology
- Industry Sectors