Azzouni J. (2004) Deflating existential consequence: A case for nominalism. Oxford University Press, New York

CrossRefBaker A. (2001) Mathematics, indispensability and scientific progress. Erkenntnis 55: 85–116

CrossRefBaker A. (2005) Are there genuine mathematical explanations of physical phenomena? Mind 114: 223–238

CrossRefBaker A. (2009) Mathematical explanation in science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60(3): 611–633

CrossRefBoyd, R. (1984) The current state of the realism debate. In J. Leplin, *Scientific realism*. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Busch, J. (forthcoming). Is the indispensability argument dispensable? *Theoria: A Swedish Journal of Philosophy*.

Colyvan M. (2001) The indispensability of mathematics. Oxford University Press, New York

CrossRefColyvan M. (2006) Scientific realism and mathematical nominalism: A marriage made in hell. In: Cheyne C., Worrall J. (eds) Rationality and reality: Conversations with Alan Musgrave. Australasian Studies Series, Kluwer, pp 225–237

Colyvan M., Lyon A. (2008) The explanatory power of phase spaces. Philosophia Mathematica 16(2): 227–243

Dieveney P. S. (2007) Dispensability in the Indispensability Argument. Synthese 157: 105–128

CrossRefField H.H. (1980) Science Without Numbers: A Defence of Nominalism. Blackwell, Oxford

Hacking I. (1982) Experimentation and Scientific Realism. Philosophical Topics 13: 71–87

Liggins D. (2008) Quine, putnam and the ‘quine-putnam’ indispensability argument. Erkenntnis 68: 113–127

CrossRefMaddy P. (1992) Indispensability and practice. Journal of Philosophy 89: 275–289

CrossRefMaddy P. (1997) Naturalism in mathematics. Clarendon Press, Oxford

Maddy P. (2007) Second philosophy: A naturalistic method. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Morrison J. (2010) Just how controversial is evidential holism? Synthese 173(3): 335–352

CrossRefParsons C. (1983) Mathematics and philosophy. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

Peressini A. (2008) Confirmational holism and its mathematical (w)holes. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 39: 102–111

CrossRefPincock C. (2004) A revealing flaw in Colyvan’s indispensability argument. Philosophy of Science 7(1): 61–79

CrossRefPsillos S. (1999) Scientific realism: How science tracks the truth. Routledge, London

Putnam, H. (1979a). *Philosophy of logic. In Philosophical papers I: Mathematics matter and method* (2nd Edn., pp. 323–357). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (first published 1971).

Putnam, H. (1979b). What is mathematical truth. In *Philosophical papers I: Mathematics matter and method* (2nd Edn., pp.60–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Quine, W. V. (1953a). On what there is. In *From a logical point of view* (2nd Edn). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Quine, W. V. (1953b). Two dogmas of empiricism. In *From a logical point of view*. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Quine, W. V. (1981). Carnap and logical truth. In *The ways of paradox*. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Quine, W. V. (1986). Reply to Charles Parsons. In L. E. Hahn P. A. Schilpp (Eds.), *The philosophy of W. V. Quine*. Open Court: La Salle Ill, (pp. 396–403).

Quine, W. V. (1992). Pursuit of truth (2nd Edn.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (first published 1975).

Resnik M. (1997) Mathematics as a science of patterns. Clarendon Press, Oxford

Sober E. (1993) Mathematics and indispensability. Philosophical Review 102: 35–58

CrossRefSober E. (2000) Quine. The aristotelian society supplementary 74(1): 237–280

CrossRefVan Fraassen B. (1980) The scientific image. Clarendon Press, Oxford

CrossRef