Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In defense of true higher-order vagueness

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stewart Shapiro recently argued that there is no higher-order vagueness. More specifically, his thesis is: (ST) ‘So-called second-order vagueness in ‘F’ is nothing but first-order vagueness in the phrase ‘competent speaker of English’ or ‘competent user of “F”’. Shapiro bases (ST) on a description of the phenomenon of higher-order vagueness and two accounts of ‘borderline case’ and provides several arguments in its support. We present the phenomenon (as Shapiro describes it) and the accounts; then discuss Shapiro’s arguments, arguing that none is compelling. Lastly, we introduce the account of vagueness Shapiro would have obtained had he retained compositionality and show that it entails true higher-order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bobzien, S. (2010). If it’s clear, then it’s clear that it’s clear, or is it? - Higher-order vagueness and the S4 Axiom. In K. Ierodiakonou (Ed.), Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes. Oxford: OUP (forthcoming).

  • Eklund, M. (2006). Review of vagueness in context. Notre Dame Philosophy Reviews. http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=6624.

  • Fine, K. (1975). Vagueness, truth and logic. Synthèse, 30, 265–300. (Reprinted in Vagueness: A reader, by R. Keefe & P. Smith, Eds., 1997, Cambridge: CUP).

  • Glanzberg M. (2003) Against truth-value gaps. In: Beall J. (eds) Liars and heaps. OUP, Oxford, pp 151–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenough, P. (2005). Higher-order vagueness. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 105(Suppl), 167–190.

  • Gross S. (2009) Review of vagueness in context. Philosophical Review 118: 261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde D. (1994) Why higher-order vagueness is a pseudo-problem. Mind 103: 35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefe R. (2000) Theories of vagueness. CUP, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefe R. (2007) Vagueness without context change. Mind 116: 275–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee V., McLaughlin B (1995) Distinctions without a difference. Southern Journal of Philosophy 33(Suppl): 203–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury M. (1991) Is there higher-order vagueness?. Philosophical Quarterly 41: 167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. (2005). Context, conversation, and so-called “higher-order” vagueness. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 105(Suppl), 147–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro S. (2006) Vagueness in context. OUP, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soames S. (1999) Understanding truth. OUP, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen R. (2008) Semivaluationism: Putting vagueness in context in context. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76: 471–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson T. (1999) On the structure of higher-order vagueness. Mind 108: 127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    Susanne Bobzien

Authors
  1. Susanne Bobzien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Bobzien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bobzien, S. In defense of true higher-order vagueness. Synthese 180, 317–335 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9704-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9704-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation