Abstract
The paper proposes a process-based model for an ontology that encompasses the emergence of process systems generated by increasingly complex levels of organization. Starting with a division of processes into those that are persistent and those that are fleeting, the model builds through a series of exclusive and exhaustive disjunctions. The crucial distinction is between those persistent and cohesive systems that are energy wells, and those that are far-from-equilibrium. The latter are necessarily open; they can persist only by interaction with their environments. Further distinctions, developed by means of the notions of self-maintenance and error detection, lead to the identification of complex biological organisms that are flexible learners, some of which are self-conscious and form themselves into social institutions. This model provides a non-reductive model for understanding human beings as both embodied and yet emergent. In particular, it provides a way of characterizing action as ‘metaphysically deep’, not an ontological embarrassment within an otherwise physicalist world.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alon U., Surette M.G., Barkai N., Leibler S. (1999) Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 397(14): 168–171
Bickhard M.H. (1998a) Levels of representationality. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 10: 179–215
Bickhard, M. H. (1998b). A process model of the emergence of representation. In G. L. Farre & T. Oksala (Eds.), Emergence, complexity, hierarchy, organization, selected and edited papers from the ECHO III Conference (pp. 263–270). Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Mathematics, Computing and Management in Engineering Series No. 91, Espoo, Finland, August 3–7.
Bickhard M.H. (2000) Autonomy, function and representation. Communication and Cognition, Special issue on Artificial Intelligence 17: 111–131
Bickhard M.H. (2004) The social ontology of persons. In: Carpenter J.I.M., Muller U.(eds) Social interaction and the development of knowledge. Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ, pp 111–132
Bickhard M.H. (2005) Consciousness and reflective consciousness. Philosophical Psychology 18(2): 205–218
Bickhard M.H. (2008) Are you social? The ontological and developmental emergence of the person. In: Müller U., Carpendale J.I.M., Budwig N., Sokol B.(eds) Social life and social knowledge. Taylor & Francis, New York, pp 17–42
Capaldi N. (1991) Analytic philosophy and language. In: Harré R., Harris R.(eds) Linguistics and philosophy. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 47
Christensen W.D., Bickhard M.H. (2002) The process dynamics of normative function. The Monist 85(1): 3–28
Christensen W.D., Hooker C.A. (2000) An interactivist-constructivist approach to intelligence: Self-directed anticipative learning. Philosophical Psychology 13: 11
Christensen, W. D., & Hooker, C. A. (2001). Self-directed agenta. In J. McIntosh (Ed.), Naturalism, evolution and intentionality, Canadian Journal of Philosophy (Supp. Vol., pp. 19–52).
Collier, J. D. (1998). Supervenience and reduction in biological hierarchies. Canadian Journal of Philosophy (Supp. Vol). Biology and Philosophy. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
Davidson, D. (1980). The logical form of action sentences. In essays on actions and events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Humphreys P. (1996) Aspects of emergence. Philosophical Topics 24: 53–70
Jackson F. (1998) From metaphysics to ethics (p. 6, fn. 5). Clarendon Press, Oxford
Kim, J. (2002). Précis of Mind in a physical world. In Philosophy and phenomenological research (Vol. LXV, pp. 640–643).
Kim J. (2005) Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 7
Lewis, D. (1986a). Humean supervenience. In Philosophical papers (Vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis D. (1986b) On the plurality of worlds. Blackwell, Oxford
Locke, J. (1975). Ed. P. H. Nidditch, An essay concerning human understanding (4th ed. of 1700). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Loewer B. (2001) From physics to physicalism. In: Gillett C., Loewer B.(eds) Physicalism and its discontents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 37
Mourelatos Alexander P.D. (1978) Events, processes and states. Linguistics and Philosophy 2: 415–434
Roeper P. (1987) Principles of abstraction for events and processes. Journal of Philosophical Logic 16: 273–307
Seibt J. (1996) The myth of substance and the fallacy of misplaced concreteness. Acta Analytica 15: 119–139
Seibt J. (1997) Existence in time: From substance to process. In: Faye J., Scheffler U., Urs M.(eds) Perspectives on time, boston studies in philosophy of science. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 143–182
Seibt, J. (2001). Formal process ontology. In FOIS-2001 Proceedings. ACM Digital Publications.
Seibt J. (2003) Free process theory: Towards a typology of occurrings. In: Seibt J.(eds) Process theories: Crossdisciplinary studies in dynamic categories. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Taylor B. (1997) Tense and continuity. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 199–220
Wimsatt W.C. (1986) Forms of aggregativity. In: Donagan A., Perovich A., Wedin M.(eds) Human nature and human knowledge. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 259–291
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campbell, R. A process-based model for an interactive ontology. Synthese 166, 453–477 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9372-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9372-0