Skip to main content
Log in

Samuel Alexander’s Emergentism: Or, Higher Causation for Physicalists

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Samuel Alexander was one of the foremost philosophical figures of his day and has been argued by John Passmore to be one of ‘fathers’ of Australian philosophy as well as a novel kind of physicalist. Yet Alexander is now relatively neglected, his role in the genesis of Australian philosophy if far from widely accepted and the standard interpretation takes him to be an anti-physicalist. In this paper, I carefully examine these issues and show that Alexander has been badly, although understandably, misjudged by most of his contemporary critics and interpreters. Most importantly, I show that Alexander offers an ingenious, and highly original, version of physicalism at the heart of which is a strikingly different view of the nature of the microphysical properties and associated view of emergent properties. My final conclusion will be that Passmore is correct in his claims both that Alexander is significant as one of the grandfather’s of Australian philosophy and that he provides a novel physicalist position. I will also suggest that Alexander’s emergentism is important for addressing the so-called ‘problem of mental causation’ presently dogging contemporary non-reductive physicalists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, S. (1892) ‘Dr. Munsterberg and his Critics’, Mind 249–264.

  • Alexander, S. (1896) ‘Hegel’s Conception of Nature’, Mind 493–423.

  • S. Alexander (1911) ArticleTitle‘Foundations and Sketch-Plan of a Conational Psychology’ Journal of Psychology IV 239–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, S. (1912) ‘The Method of Metaphysics and the Categories’, Mind 1–20.

  • Alexander, S. (1914) ‘The Basis of Realism’, Proceedings of the British Academy. Reprinted in Chisholm 1960 (ed.), Realism and the Background in Phenomenology, Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois.

  • Alexander, S. (1920) Space, Time and Deity. Two Volumes. The Gifford Lectures 1916–1918, Macmillan, Toronto.

  • S. Alexander (1927) ‘Preface to the 1927 Impression’ Alexander (Eds) Space, Time and Deity Macmillan New York

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Alexander (1939) Philosophical and Literary Pieces Macmillan London

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Anderson (1962) Studies in Empirical Philosophy Angus and Robertson London

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Bain (1870) Logic American Book Co New York

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Baker (1986) Australian Realism: The Systematic philosophy of John Anderson Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Beckermann H. Flohr J. Kim (Eds) (1992) Emergence or Reduction? Essays on The Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism Walter de Gruyter New York

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Blitz (1992) Emergent Evolution Kluwer New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad, C.D. (1921) ‘Prof. Alexander’s Gifford Lectures’. Mind 30, 25–39 and 129–150

    Google Scholar 

  • C.D. Broad (1923) The Mind and its Place in Nature Routledge Kegan Paul London

    Google Scholar 

  • M.W. Calkins (1923) ArticleTitle‘The Dual Role of Mind in the Philosophy of S Alexander’. Mind 32 197–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. (1994) ‘Fundamentalism vs. the Patchwork of Laws’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society XCIV, 279–92.

  • S. Crook C. Gillett (2001) ArticleTitle‘Why Physics Alone Cannot Define the ‘Physical” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 333–60

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Emmet (1966) ‘Foreword to 1966 Edition’, in the reprint edition of Alexander’s Space, Time and Deity Macmillan New York

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Emmet (1967) ‘Samuel Alexander’ Edwards (Eds) Encyclopedia of Philosophy Macmillan New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor (1974) ArticleTitle‘Special Sciences: Or, the Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis’ Synthese 28 97–115 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00485230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Gillett (2001) ArticleTitle‘Does the Argument from Realization Generalize? Responses to Kim’ Southern Journal of Philosophy 39 79–98 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.2041-6962.2001.tb01807.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Gillett (2002a) ArticleTitle‘The Dimensions of Realization: A Critique of the Standard View’ Analysis 62 316–23 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8284.00377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Gillett (2002b) ArticleTitle‘The Varieties of Emergence: Their Purposes, Obligations and Importance’ Grazer Philosophische Studien 65 89–115

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Gillett (2003a) ArticleTitle‘Strong Emergence as a Defense of Non-Reductive Physicalism: A Physicalist Metaphysics for ‘Downward’ Determination’ Principia 6 83–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, C.: 2003b, ‘Non-Reductive Realization and Non-Reductive Identity: What Physicalism does not Entail’, in Walter and Heckmann (eds.), Physicalism and Mental Causation, Mentis, London.

  • Gillett, C.: 2003c, ‘The Metaphysics of Realization, Multiple Realizability and the Special Sciences’, Journal of Philosophy 591–603.

  • Heil, J. (2000) ‘Multiple Realizability’, American Philosophical Quarterly,

  • Kim, J. (1992) “Downward Causation’ in Emergentism and Nonreductive Physicalism’, in Beckermann, Flohr and Kim (eds.),

  • Kim, J. (1997) ‘The Mind-Body Problem: Taking Stock After Forty Years’, Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 11.

  • J. Kim (1998) Mind in a Physical World M.I.T. Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kim (1999) ArticleTitle‘Making Sense of Emergence’ Philosophical Studies 95 3–44 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004563122154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laird, J. (1938) ‘Obituary: Samuel Alexander’, Proceedings of the British Academy 379–395.

  • Laird, J. (1939) ‘Memoir’, In Alexander.

  • Lewes, G. (1875) Problems of Life and Mind. Volume 2. Kegan Paul, Trench and Turbner, London.

  • Lowe, V. (1990) Alfred North Whitehead: The Man and his Work. Volume II: 1910–1947. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

  • McLaughlin, B. (1992) ‘The Rise and Fall of British Emergentism’, in Beckermann, Flohr and Kim (eds.),

  • C.B. Martin (1997) ArticleTitle‘On the Need for Properties: The Road to Pythagoreanism and Back’ Synthese 112 IssueID2 193–231 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004983524345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. (1843) Logic, Eighth Edition, Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, London

  • C. Morgan (1923) Emergent Evolution Williams and Norgate London

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. (1927) ‘The Concept of Organism, Emergent and Resultant’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society.

  • T. O’Connor (1994) ArticleTitle‘Emergent Properties’ American Philosophical Quarterly 31 91–104

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Papineau (1993) Philosophical Naturalism Basil Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, J. (1966) A Hundred Years of Philosophy, 2nd edn., Penguin, Harmondsworth.

  • Prior, E., Pargetter, R., and Jackson, F. (1982) ‘Three Theses About Dispositions’, American Philosophical Quarterly.

  • Shoemaker, S. (1980) ‘Causality and Properties’, in Van Inwagen (ed.), Time and Cause. Reidel, Dordrecht.

  • Stout, G.F. (1940) ‘The Philosophy of Samuel Alexander’, Mind XLIX, 1–18 and 135–149.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl Gillett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gillett, C. Samuel Alexander’s Emergentism: Or, Higher Causation for Physicalists. Synthese 153, 261–296 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-5470-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-5470-4

Keywords

Navigation