Abstract
There are good reasons to think natural languages are compositional. But compound nominals (CNs) are largely productive constructions that have proven highly recalcitrant to compositional semantic analysis. I evaluate existing proposals to treat CNs compositionally and argue that they are unsuccessful. I then articulate an alternative proposal according to which CNs contain covert indexicals. Features of the context allow a variety of relations to be expressed using CNs, but this variety is not expressed in the lexicon or the semantic rules of the language. This proposal accounts for the diversity of contents CNs can be used to express while preserving compositionality. Finally, I defend this proposal against some recent anti-contextualist arguments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
V. Adams, An Introduction to Modern English Word-Formation. London: Longman (1973).
C. Barker, Possessive Descriptions. Stanford: CSLI Publications (1995).
L. Bauer, ‘On the Need for Pragmatics in the Study of Nominal Compounding’. Journal of Pragmatics 3 (1979) 45-50
L. Bauer, English Word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1983).
H. Cappelen and E. Lepore, ‘Indexicality, Binding, Anaphora, and A Priori Truth’. Analysis 62 (2002) 271-281
H. Cappelen and E. Lepore, ‘Context Shifting Arguments’. Philosophical Perspectives 17 (2003) 25-50
H. Cappelen and E. Lepore, Insensitive Semantics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers (2005).
H. H. Clark, ‘Making Sense of Nonce Sense’. In: G. B. Flores d’Arcais and R. Jarvella (eds.) The Process of Language Understanding. New York: Wiley (1983) pp. 297-331
C. Corum, ‘Anaphoric Peninsulas’. CLS 9 (1973) 89-97
P. Downing, ‘On the Creation and Use of English Compound Nouns’. Language 53 (1977) 810-842
D. Dowty, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: D. Reidel (1979).
A. Garnham, Mental Models and the Interpretation of Anaphora. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis (2001).
C. L. Gagné, ‘Lexical and Relational Influences on the Processing of Novel Compounds’. Brain and Language 81 (2002) 723-735
R. J. Gerrig and G. L. Murphy, ‘Contextual Influences on the Comprehension of Complex Concepts’. Language and Cognitive Processes 7 (1992) 205-230
L. R. Gleitman and H. Gleitman, Phrase and Paraphrase: Some Innovative Uses of Language. New York: W. W. Norton (1970).
D. Kaplan, ‘Demonstratives’. In: J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1989a) pp. 481-565
D. Kaplan, Afterthoughts. In: J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1989b) pp. 565-614
M. Krifka, F. J. Pelletier, G. N. Carlson, A. ter Meulen, G. Link and G. Chierchia, ‘Genericity: An Introduction’. In: G. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier (eds.) The Generic Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1995) pp. 1-124
R. Lahav, ‘Against Compositionality: The Case of Adjectives’. Philosophical Studies 57 (1989) 261-279
R. B. Lees, The Grammar of English Nominalization. The Hague: Mouton (1960).
J. L. Levi, The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. New York: Academic Press (1978).
D. Lewis, ‘Index, Context, and Content’. In: S. Kanger and Sven Öhman (eds.) Philosophy and Grammar. Boston: D. Reidel (1980) pp. 79-100
R. Lieber, Deconstructing Morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1992).
H. Marchand, The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. München: C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (1969).
M. Moortgat, ‘Compositionality and the Syntax of Words’. In: J. Groendijk, D. Jongh de and M. Stokhof (eds.) Foundations of Pragmatics and Lexical Semantics. Dordrecht: Foris (1987) pp. 41-62
G. Nunberg, ‘Indexicality and Deixis’. Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (1993) 1-43
B. Partee, ‘Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-Shifting Principles’. In: J. Groenendijk, D. Jongh de and M. Stokhof (eds.) Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers. Dordrecht: Foris (1986) pp. 115-143
B. Partee, ‘Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts’. CLS 25 (1989) 342-356
F. J. Pelletier, ‘Context Dependence and Compositionality’. Mind and Language 18 (2003) 148-161
F. J. Pelletier and L. K. Schubert, ‘Mass Expressions’. In: D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic Vol. 10. Dordrecht: D. Reidel (2003) pp. 265-350
P. Postal, ‘Anaphoric Islands’. CLS 5 (1969) 205-239
F. Recanati, Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers (1993).
F. Recanati, Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2004).
M. Reimer, ‘Do Adjectives Conform to Compositionality?’. Philosophical Perspectives 16 (2002) 183-198
M. E. Ryder, Ordered Chaos: The Interpretation of English Noun–Noun Compounds. Berkeley: University of California Press (1994).
R. M. Sainsbury, ‘Two Ways to Smoke a Cigarette’. Ratio 14 (2001) 386-406
E. O. Selkirk, The Syntax of Words. Cambridge: MIT Press (1982).
R. Sproat, ‘On Anaphoric Islandhood’. In: M. Hammond and M. Noonan (eds.) Theoretical Morphology. San Diego: Academic Press (1988) pp. 291-301
R. Sproat and G. Ward, ‘Pragmatic Considerations in Anaphoric Island Phenomena’. CLS 23 (1987) 321-335
J. Stanley, ‘Context and Logical Form’. Linguistics and Philosophy 23 (2000) 391-434
J. Stanley, ‘Making it Articulated’. Mind and Language 17 (2002) 149-168
J. Stanley and Z. G. Szabó, ‘On Quantifier Domain Restriction’. Mind and Language 15 (2000) 219-261
Storto, G.: 2003, Possessives in Context: Issues in the Semantics of Possessive Constructions, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Z. G. Szabó, ‘Adjectives in Context’. In: I. Kenesei and R. M. Harnish (eds.) Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (2001) pp. 119-146
J. R. Taylor, Possessives in English. Oxford: Clarendon Press (1996).
G. Ward, R. Sproat and G. McKoon, ‘A Pragmatic Analysis of So-called Anaphoric Islands’. Language 67 (1991) 439-474
E. J. Wisniewski, ‘When Concepts Combine’. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4 (1997) 167-183
E. J. Wisniewski and B. C. Love, ‘Relations versus Properties in Conceptual Combination’. Journal of Memory and Language 38 (1998) 177-202
Zimmer, K.: 1971, ‘Some General Observations about Nominal Compounds’, Working Papers on Linguistic Universals 5, Department of Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford, pp. C1–C21.
Zimmer, K.: 1972, ‘Appropriateness Conditions for Nominal Compounds’, Working Papers on Linguistic Universals 8, Department of Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford, pp. 3–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weiskopf, D.A. Compound Nominals, Context, and Compositionality. Synthese 156, 161–204 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-3489-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-3489-1