Skip to main content
Log in

Convergence indicator: the case of cloud computing

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Convergence is a term that is often used to explain changes in contemporary society, and technological convergence has been an important source of technological innovation in industry. For this paper we adopted a microscopic approach to the question of measuring the level of technological convergence using patent-citation analysis. We developed a convergence indicator that shows the relative convergence degree of a patent. This indicator, which is based on backward and forward patent citations, can assess the extent of the level of convergence or universality. Finally, we conducted an empirical analysis of the cloud computing area using patent-citation analysis from a microscopic perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosenberg N (1963) Technological changes in the machine tool industry, 1840–1910. J Econ Hist 23(4):414–446

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance, nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. National Science Foundation, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nordmann A (2004) Converging technologies—shaping the future of European society. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hwang JT, Kim BK (2006) Analysis of the multi-technology capabilities of Korea and Taiwan using patent bibliometrics. Asian J Technol Innov 14(2):183–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Curran CS, Leker J (2010) Patent indicators for monitoring convergence—examples from NFF and ICT. Technol Forecast Soc Change 78(2):256–273. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee KR (2007) Patterns and processes of contemporary technology fusion: the case of intelligent robots. Asian J Technol Innov 15(2):45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. No HJ, Park YT (2010) Trajectory patterns of technology fusion: trend analysis and taxonomical grouping in nanobiotechnology. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77(1):63–75. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2009.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoon B, Park Y (2007) Development of a new technology forecasting algorithm—hybrid approach for morphology analysis and conjoint analysis of patent information. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 54(3):588–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lind J (2004) Convergence: History of term usage and lessons for firm strategists. In: Proc ITS 15th biennial conf, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kodama F (1991) Analyzing Japanese high technologies: the techno paradigm shift. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wong PK, Singh A (2005) Technological specialization and convergence of small countries: the case of the late-industrializing Asian NIEs, Development and Comp Systems. EconWPA

  12. Clarkson G, DeKorte D (2006) The problem of patent thickets in convergent technologies. Ann NY Acad Sci 1093:180–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang L, Chen X (2007) Technology convergence in the electronic industry under the FDI environment in China. In: Proc IEEE int conf on wirel commun netw mobile comput (WiCom’07), pp 5831–5834. doi:10.1109/WICOM.2007.1430

    Google Scholar 

  14. Archibugi D (1992) Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation: a review. Sci Public Policy 19(16):357–368

    Google Scholar 

  15. Albert MB, Avery D, Narin F (1991) Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Res Policy 20:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carpenter MP, Narin F, Woolf P (1981) Citation rates of technologically important patents. World Pat Inf 3(5):160–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Fogarty MS (2000) Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: evidence from a survey of inventors. Am Econ Rev 90(2):215–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bawa R (2004) Nanotechnology patenting in the US. Nanotechnol Law Bus 1:31–50

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ryu S, Lee K, Mun Y (2010) Optimized fast handover scheme in Mobile IPv6 networks to support mobile users for cloud computing. J Supercomput. doi:10.1007/s11227-010-0459-2

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yoon C, Hassan MM, Lee H, Ryu W, Huh EN (2010) Dynamic collaborative cloud service platform: opportunities and challenges. ETRI J 32(4):634–637. doi:10.4218/etrij.10.0209.0489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wei G, Vasilakos A-V, Zheng Y, Xiong N (2010) A game-theoretic method of fair resource allocation for cloud computing services. J Supercomput 54(2):252–269. doi:10.1007/s11227-009-0318-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hee-Kyung Kong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sung, K., Kong, HK. & Kim, T. Convergence indicator: the case of cloud computing. J Supercomput 65, 27–37 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-011-0706-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-011-0706-1

Keywords

Navigation