Skip to main content
Log in

An Alternative Normalization of the Implicative Fragment of Classical Logic

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A normalizable natural deduction formulation, with subformula property, of the implicative fragment of classical logic is presented. A traditional notion of normal deduction is adapted and the corresponding weak normalization theorem is proved. An embedding of the classical logic into the intuitionistic logic, restricted on propositional implicational language, is described as well. We believe that this multiple-conclusion approach places the classical logic in the same plane with the intuitionistic logic, from the proof-theoretical viewpoint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boričić B.: A note on some intermediate propositional calculi. Journal of Symbolic Logic 49, 329–333 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boričić B.: On sequence-conclusion natural deduction systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic 14, 359–377 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boričić B.: On certain normalizable natural deduction formulations of some propositional intermediate logics. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29(4), 563–568 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boričić, B., On some statements of proof theory, (serbocroatian: O nekim tvrdjenjima teorije dokaza), Matematika XVII(Br. 3):40–47, 1988.

  5. Boričić, B., On interpretation of logical sistem, (serbocroatian: O interpretaciji logičkog sistema), Matematika XIX(Br. 3):40–44, 1990.

  6. Boričić B.: On some interpretations of classical logic. Zeitschrift für mathematishe Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 38, 409–412 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boričić, B., Logic and Proof, Ekonomski fakultet, Beograd 2011, pp. 154+iv, ISBN:978-86-403-1096-3

  8. Cellucci C.: Existential instantiation and normalization in sequent natural deduction. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 58, 111–148 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Curry H.B.: A note on the reduction of Gentzen’s calculus LJ. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 45, 288–293 (1939)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Curry H.B.: Foundations of Mathematical Logic. McGraw-Hill, New York (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Francez N.: Harmony in multiple-conclusions natural-deduction. Logica Universalis 8, 215–259 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gabbay D.M.: Applications of trees to intermediate logics. Journal of Symbolic Logic 37, 135–138 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gentzen, G., Collected Papers, in M. E. Szabo (ed.), North–Holland, Amsterdam 1969.

  14. Girard J.Y., Taylor P., Lafont Y.: Proofs and Types. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Glivenko M.V.: Sur quelques points de la logique de M. Brouwer. Bulletins de la classe des sciences, Academie Royale de Belgique 15(5), 183–188 (1929)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gödel, K., Zur intuitionistischen Arithmetik und Zahlentheorie, Ergebnisse eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums, 1932–1933, vol. 4, pp. 34–38; English transl. The Undecidable, in M. Davis (ed.), Raven Press, New York 1965, pp. 75–81; reprinted, with additional comment in Kurt Gödel, Collected Works, vol. I, in S. Feferman et al (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York 1986, pp. 282–295.

  17. Gordeev L.: On cut elimination in the presence of Peirce rule. Archive for Mathematical Logic 26, 147–164 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Homič V.I.: A separability theorem for superintuitionistic propositional calculi. Soviet Mathematics Doklady 17(4), 1214–1216 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Homič V.I.: On the problem of separability for superintuitionistic propositional logics. Soviet Mathematics Doklady 22(2), 476–479 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Horn A.: The separation theorem of intuitionist propositional calculus. Journal of Symbolic Logic 27, 391–399 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hosoi, T., On the separation theorem of intermediate propositional calculi, Proceedings of the Japan Academy 42:535–538, 1966a.

  22. Hosoi T.: The separation theorem on the classical system. Journal of the Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo 12, 223–230 (1966b)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hosoi, T., Algebraic proof of the separation theorem on classical propositional calculus, Proceedings of the Japan Academy 42:67–69, 1966c.

  24. Johansson I.: Der Minimalkalkül, ein reduzierter intuitionistische Formalismus. Computational Mathematics 4, 119–136 (1937)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kleene S.C.: Introduction to Metamathematics. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kolmogorov, A. N., On the principle of excluded middle, (Russian) Math. Zbor. 32:646–667, 1925; English transl. in From Frege to Gödel: A Source-Book in Mathematical Logic, in J. van Heijenoort (ed.), Harvard University Press, London 1967, pp. 414–437.

  27. Lopez–Escobar E.G.K.: Implicational logics in natural deduction systems. Journal of Symbolic Logic 47(1), 184–186 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pereira L.C., Haeusler E.H., Costa V.G., Sanz W.: A new normalization strategy for the implicational fragment of classical propositional logic. Studia Logica 96(1), 95–108 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Prawitz D.: Natural Deduction. A Proof-Theoretical Study. Almquist and Wiksell, Stockholm (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Read S.: Harmony and autonomy in classical logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29, 123–154 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Seldin J.P.: Normalization and excluded middle I. Studia Logica 48(2), 193–217 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shoesmith, D. J., and T. J. Smiley, Multiple-Conclusion Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1978) (Reprinted 1980).

  33. Tennant N.W.: Natural Logic. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zimmermann E.: Peirce’s rule in natural deduction. Theoretical Computer Science 275(1–2), 561–574 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wajsberg M.: Untersuchungen über den Aussagenkalkúl von A. Heyting. Wiadomości matematyczne 46, 45–101 (1938)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Branislav Boričić.

Additional information

Presented by Heinrich Wansing

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boričić, B., Ilić, M. An Alternative Normalization of the Implicative Fragment of Classical Logic. Stud Logica 103, 413–446 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-014-9573-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-014-9573-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation