Skip to main content
Log in

No Reservations Required? Defending Anti-Nominalism

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a 2005 paper, John Burgess and Gideon Rosen offer a new argument against nominalism in the philosophy of mathematics. The argument proceeds from the thesis that mathematics is part of science, and that core existence theorems in mathematics are both accepted by mathematicians and acceptable by mathematical standards. David Liggins (2007) criticizes the argument on the grounds that no adequate interpretation of “acceptable by mathematical standards” can be given which preserves the soundness of the overall argument. In this discussion I offer a defense of the Burgess-Rosen argument against Liggins’s objection. I show how plausible versions of the argument can be constructed based on either of two interpretations of mathematical acceptability, and I locate the argument in the space of contemporary anti-nominalist views.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burgess, John, and Gideon Rosen, ‘Nominalism reconsidered’, in S. Shapiro (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 515–535.

  2. Chihara Charles (2007) ‘The Burgess-Rosen critique of nominalistic reconstructions’. Philosophia Mathematica (III) 15, 54–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Corfield, David : ‘Mathematical blogging’. The Reasoner 1 3, 6–7 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liggins, David : ‘Anti-nominalism reconsidered’. Philosophical Quarterly 57, 104–111 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maddy, Penelope, Mathematical Naturalism, Clarendon Press, 1997.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Baker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baker, A. No Reservations Required? Defending Anti-Nominalism. Stud Logica 96, 127–139 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-010-9277-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-010-9277-z

Keywords

Navigation