Skip to main content
Log in

Predicate Logical Extensions of some Subintuitionistic Logics

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents predicate logical extensions of some subintuitionistic logics. Subintuitionistic logics result if conditions of the accessibility relation in Kripke models for intuitionistic logic are dropped. The accessibility relation which interprets implication in models for the propositional base subintuitionistic logic considered here is neither persistent on atoms, nor reflexive, nor transitive. Strongly complete predicate logical extensions are modeled with a second accessibility relation, which is a partial order, for the interpretation of the universal quantifier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Benthem J. (1986) ‘Partiality and Nonmonotonicity in Classical Logic’. Logique et Analyse 29: 226–246

    Google Scholar 

  2. Celani S., Jansana R. (2001) ‘A Closer Look at Some Subintuitionistic Logics’. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 42(4): 225–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Corsi G. (1987) ‘Weak Logics with Strict Implication’. Zeitschrift fuer Mathematische Logik 33: 389–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dosen, K., 1993, ‘Modal Translations in K and D’. in de Rijke, M. (ed.), Diamonds and Defaults, pp. 103–127.

  5. Fitting M.C. (1969) Intuitionistic Logic, Model Theory and Forcing. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gabbay D. (1981) Semantical Investigations in Heyting’s Intuitionistic Logic. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kripke S.A. (1965) ‘Semantical Analysis of Intuitionistic Logic’. In: Crossley J.N., Dummett M.A.E. (eds) Formal Systems and Recursive Functions. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 93–130

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rasiowa H. (1974) An algebraical approach to non-classical logics. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Restall G. (1994) ‘Subintuitionistic Logics’. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35: 116–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruitenberg W. (1998) ‘Basic Predicate Calculus’. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39(1): 18–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomason R.H. (1968) ‘Strong Completeness of Intuitionistic Predicate Logic’. Journal of Symbol Logic 33: 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wansing H. (1997) ‘Displaying as Temporalizing: Sequent systems for subintuitionistic logics’. In: Akama S. (eds) Logic, language and computation. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 159–178

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zimmermann, E., 2001, ‘A subintuitionistic predicate logic and some of its methods’. in de Swart, H. (ed.), Relational Methods in Computer Science, pp. 228–240.

  14. Zimmermann E. (2002) ‘A predicate logical extension of a subintuitionistic propositional logic’. Studia Logica 72(3): 401–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernst Zimmermann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zimmermann, E. Predicate Logical Extensions of some Subintuitionistic Logics. Stud Logica 91, 131–138 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-009-9166-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-009-9166-5

Keywords

Navigation