Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A study of motivational influences on academic achievement

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the influence of motivation on academic achievement. The theoretical rationale for the study is grounded in bridging two influential yet isolated literatures of motivation: goal setting theory and achievement goal theory. Although it is clear that academic performance should be influenced by assigned learning goals, surprisingly, goal setting theory has rarely been used as a theoretical framework to further our understanding of academic performance. College students enrolled in an introductory course were given assigned performance or assigned learning goals. Internal achievement goals were assessed and academic performance was measured. Results indicated that to ensure academic success the most advantageous goals a teacher should assign in a classroom are “assigned learning goals”. Additionally, the combination of internal mastery achievement goals and performance-approve achievement goals predicted academic performance, thereby supporting a multiple achievement goals perspective. Theoretical and applied implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, S., & Weiss, H. M. (1988). Recent developments in the study of personality and organizational behavior. In C. L. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 307–330). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 706–722. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. C., & Latham, G. P. (2006). The effect of training in verbal self-guidance on performance effectiveness in a MBA program. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue, 38, 1–11. doi:10.1037/h0087266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 392–414. doi:10.1002/tea.20006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cianci, A. M., Klein, H. J., & Seijts, G. H. (2010a). The effect of negative feedback on tension and subsequent performance: The main and interactive effects of goal content and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 618–630. doi:10.1037/a0019130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cianci, A. M., Schaubroeck, J. M., & McGill, G. A. (2010b). Achievement goals, feedback, and task performance. Human Performance, 23, 131–154. doi:10.1080/08959281003621687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, M., Irby, D. M., Sullivan, W., & Ludmerer, K. M. (2006). American medical education 100 years after the Flexner report. New England Journal of Medicine, 355, 1339–1344. doi:10.1056/NEJMra055445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeShon, R. P., & Gillespie, J. Z. (2005). A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1096–1127. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, S. (2009). Federal researchers find lower standards in schools. The New York Times, p. A22.

  • Dishon-Berkovits, M. (2013). Burnout: Contributing and protecting factors within the work-family interface. Journal of Career Development. doi:10.1177/0894845313512181.

  • Dishon-Berkovits, M., & Koslowsky, M. (2002). Determinants of employee punctuality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 723–739. doi:10.1080/00224540209603932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drach-Zahavy, A., & Erez, M. (2002). Challenge versus threat effects on the goal-performance relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 667–682. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00004-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Essays in social psychology. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. C., Connolly, T., & Ekegren, G. (1989). Goals, strategy development and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 24–33. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Covington, M. V. (2001). Approach and avoidance motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 73–92. doi:10.1023/A:1009009018235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, A. D., & Schneider, W. (1983). Category and word search: Generalizing search principles to complex processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 177–195. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.9.2.177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, M. W., & Luzadis, R. A. (2009). The importance of perceived task difficulty in goal orientation-assigned goal alignment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 16, 167–174. doi:10.1177/1548051809337875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollub, J. P., Bertenthal, M. W., Labov, J. B., & Curtis, P. C. (2002). Learning and understanding: Improving advanced study of mathematics and science in U.S. high schools. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422–449. doi:10.1037/a0018947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakšić, M., & Vidović, V. V. (2008). Achievement goals, perceived competence, gender and learning strategies in a general academic context. Suvremena Psihologija, 11, 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657–690. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2006). Disentangling achievement orientation and goal setting: Effects on self-regulatory processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 900–916. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (2007). New developments in and directions for goal-setting research. European Psychologist, 12, 290–300. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.12.4.290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G. P., Seijts, G., & Crim, D. (2008). The effects of learning goal difficulty level and cognitive ability on performance. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue, 40, 220–229. doi:10.1037/a0013114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1990). Personality dispositions revisited and revised. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 111–1344). New York NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mone, M. A., & Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of task complexity and goal specificity on change in strategy and performance over time. Human Performance, 8, 243–262. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0804_1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskovitz, C., & Kellogg, D. (2011). Inquiry-based writing in the laboratory course. Science, 332, 919–920. doi:10.1126/science.1200353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2003). BIO 2010: Transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2013). Extending antecedents of achievement goals: The double-edged sword effect of social-oriented achievement motive and gender differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 249–255. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nien, C. L., & Duda, J. L. (2008). Antecedents and consequences of approach and avoidance achievement goals: A test of gender invariance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 352–372. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noel, T. W., & Latham, G. P. (2006). The importance of learning goals versus outcome goals for entrepreneurs. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 7, 213–220. doi:10.5367/000000006779111594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 128–150. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R. L., & Latham, G. P. (2013). The effect of employee learning goals and goal commitment on departmental performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20, 62–68. doi:10.1177/1548051812467208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seijts, G., & Crim, D. (2009). The combined effects of goal type and cognitive ability on performance. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 343–352. doi:10.1007/s11031-009-9143-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2001). The effect of distal learning, outcome, and proximal goals on a moderately complex task. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 291–307. doi:10.1002/job.70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seijts, G. H., Latham, G. P., Tasa, K., & Latham, B. W. (2004). Goal setting and goal orientation: An integration of two different yet related literatures. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 227–239. doi:10.2307/20159574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46, 26–47. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.538646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasa, K., Celani, A., & Bell, C. M. (2013). Goals in negotiation revisited: The impact of goal setting and implicit negotiation beliefs. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 6, 114–132. doi:10.1111/ncmr.12006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbina, I. (2010). As school exit tests prove tough, states ease standards. The New York Times, p. A1.

  • VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995–1015. doi:10.1177/0013164497057006009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VandeWalle, D., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W, Jr. (2001). The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 629–640. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitcomb, M. E. (2006). The teaching of basic sciences in medical school. Academic Medicine, 81, 413–414. doi:10.1097/01.ACM.0000222262.85760.13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters, D., & Latham, G. P. (1996). The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Group and Organization Management, 21, 236–250. doi:10.1177/1059601196212007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. E., Mento, A. J., & Locke, E. A. (1987). Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 416–425. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, A. Y., Lawhorn, J. K., Lumley, T., & Freeman, S. (2008). Application of Bloom’s taxonomy debunks the “MCAT myth”. Science, 319, 414–415. doi:10.1126/science.1147852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business Administration, Ono Academic College, 104 Zahal Street, 55000 , Kiryat Ono, Israel

    Miriam Dishon-Berkovits

Authors
  1. Miriam Dishon-Berkovits
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miriam Dishon-Berkovits.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dishon-Berkovits, M. A study of motivational influences on academic achievement. Soc Psychol Educ 17, 327–342 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9257-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9257-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation