Abstract
This essay examines several ethical and epistemological issues that arise when philosophers conduct empirical research focused on, or in collaboration with, community groups seeking to bring about systemic change. This type of research can yield important policy lessons about effective community-driven reform and how to incorporate the voices of marginalized citizens in public policy debates. Community-based reform efforts are also particularly ripe for philosophical analysis since they can demonstrate the strengths and shortcomings of democratic and egalitarian ideals. This type of research also raises unique ethical dilemmas that challenge central tenets of research ethics. We focus on two foundational questions: What does informed consent mean in the context of community-based research (CBR) when CBR may dissolve differences between researcher and research participant, and its parameters can be hard to delineate? And what ethical, democratic, and epistemic issues arise when conducting research with and on community groups, given potentially competing commitments to respect the epistemological contributions of all participants while also meeting research norms to warrant findings and conclusions? Our examination has two aspects: we grapple with these issues through examples from our work to reveal their significance in our own philosophic practice, and more broadly, to reveal their significance as problems within traditional research ethics. We believe that this approach will demonstrate the utility of philosophic engagement with dilemmas in research ethics as a reflective matter, and in the course of empirical research itself.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
3–4 min autobiographical digital videos that combine voice, images, and music.
We focus this discussion on the adult storytellers; the parents of the middle and high school students who made stories signed the consent and release forms. We recognize the additional ethical complications of these cases, but leave them aside in this analysis.
This research grew out of a larger, multi-year study of organizations in the San Francisco Bay Area that advocate for youth; see McLaughlin et al. (2009).
For analysis of these questions, see Newman (2013), Chap. 5.
References
Allen, D. S., & Reich, R. (Eds.). (2013). Education, justice and democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Beckett, L., Glass, R. D., & Moreno, A. P. (2012). A pedagogy of community building: Re-imagining parent involvement and community organizing in popular education efforts. Journal of the Association of Mexican American Educators, 6(2), 5–14.
Bowles, S., Gintis, H., & Groves, M. O. (Eds.). (2008). Unequal chances: Family background and economic success. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Brydon-Miller, M. (2008). Ethics and action research: Deepening our commitment to principles of social justice and democratic practice. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research (pp. 199–210). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Brydon-Miller, M. (2009). Covenantal ethics and action research. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), The handbook of social research ethics (pp. 243–258). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Buchanan, A. E., & Brock, D. W. (1989). Deciding for others: The ethics of surrogate decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Calhoun, C. (Ed.). (1992). Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 307–326.
Church, K., Bascia, N., & Shragge, E. (Eds.). (2008). Learning through community: Exploring participatory practices. London: Springer.
Cottrell, B., & Parpart, J. (2006). Academic-community collaboration, gender research, and development: Pitfalls and possibilities. Development in Practice, 16(1), 15–26.
Eckenwiler, L., Feinholz, D., Ells, C., & Schonfeld, T. (2008). The Declaration of Helsinki through a feminist lens. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 1(1), 161–177.
Faden, R., & Beauchamp, T. (1986). A theory and history of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25(26), 56–80.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury.
Kirsch, G. E. (1999). Ethical dilemmas in feminist research: The politics of location, interpretation, and publication. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Malone, R., et al. (2006). “It’s Like Tuskegee in Reverse”: A case study of ethical tensions in Institutional Review Board review of community-based participatory research. American Journal of Public Health, 96(11), 1914–1919.
McLaughlin, M., Scott, W. R., Deschenes, S., Hopkins, K., & Newman, A. (2009). Between movement and establishment: Organizations advocating for youth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Nelson, L. H. (1993). Epistemological communities. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49–82). New York: Routledge.
Newman, A. (2013). Realizing educational rights: Advancing school reform through courts and communities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Newman, A., & Glass, R. D. (2014). Comparing ethical and epistemic standards for investigative journalists and equity-oriented collaborative community-based researchers: Why working for a university matters. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(3), 283–311.
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev ed.). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
Sanders, L. (1997). Against deliberation. Political Theory, 25(3), 347–376.
Schrag, Z. M. (2010). Ethical imperialism: Institutional review boards and the social sciences, 1965–2009. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Young, I. M. (2001). Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29(5), 670–690.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newman, A., Glass, R.D. Ethical and Epistemic Dilemmas in Empirically-Engaged Philosophy of Education. Stud Philos Educ 34, 217–228 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9418-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9418-3