Skip to main content
Log in

The Paradox of Public Service Jefferson, Education, and the Problem of Plato’s Cave

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plato noticed a sizeable problem apropos of establishing his republic—that there was always a ready pool of zealous potential rulers, lying in wait for a suitable opportunity to rule on their own tyrannical terms. He also recognized that those persons best suited to rule, those persons with foursquare and unimpeachable virtue, would be least motivated to govern. Ruling a polis meant that those persons, fully educated and in complete realization that the most complete happiness comprises solitary study of things unchanging, would have to compromise their happiness for the wellbeing of their polis and of the people in it. Plato’s solution, in effect that the aristoi would merely recognize their duty to sacrifice personal happiness for the happiness of the polis, has perplexed and continues today to perplex scholars. Like Plato, Jefferson recognized that there was always a pool of eager sharks, ready to govern. His republicanism, comprising a ward system and general education, was founded on the fullest participation of its citizenry, suitably educated and a governing aristoi. The true aristoi, the “natural aristoi”, are the intelligent and virtuous and that government is best which allows for a “pure selection” of the natural aristoi into the governing offices. Nonetheless, as Jefferson’s own life shows, non-parochial governing meant being rent from domestic tranquility, being forced to leave behind one’s personal affairs to decay, and being tossed willy-nilly into the coliseum of nonstop political wrangling. Why would anyone, particularly one wanting to be happy, wish to govern? Thus, Jefferson faced the same problem that Plato faced. How could a state be structured so that the wisest and most virtuous would be motivated to rule? In this paper, I argue that Jefferson, in full recognition of the problem of encouraging the most intelligent and virtuous to govern, the problem of public service, offers a solution that is remarkably Platonic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annas, J. (1981). An introduction to Plato’s republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean ethics, trans. Terence Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. (1977). The psychology of justice in Plato. American philosophical quarterly, 14, 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diogenes, L. (1925). Lives of eminent philosophers, Vols. vi–x. (Trans. R. D. Hicks). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Frisch, M. (1997). Jeffersonianism and the new deal. In G. L. McDowell & S. L. Noble (Eds.), Reason and republicanism: Thomas Jefferson’s legacy of liberty (pp. 205–216). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holowchak, M. A. (2012a). Dutiful correspondent: Philosophical essays on Thomas Jefferson. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holowchak, M. A. (2012b). The ‘reluctant politician’: Thomas Jefferson’s debt to Epicurus. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 27, (2), 277–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home, H. (2011). Essays on the principles of morality and religion. In M. C. Moran (Ed.), The online library of liberty. http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=1352&chapter=66207&layout=html#a_1613733.

  • Hume, D. (1983). An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. In J. B. Schneewind (Ed.), Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

  • Jefferson, T. (1892–1899). The writings of Thomas Jefferson, In P. L. Ford (Ed.), 10 Vols. New York: Putnam’s.

  • Jefferson, T. (1984). Thomas Jefferson: Writings. In M. D. Peterson (Ed.), New York: The Library of America.

  • Kraut, R. (1999). Return to the cave: Republic 519–521. In G. Fine (Ed.), Oxford readings in philosophy: Plato: Ethics, politics, religion, and the soul. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. A. (1988). Jefferson and nature: An interpretation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. (2007). The utopian character of Plato’s ideal city. Cambridge companion to Plato’s Republic. pp. 232–255. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Ostrander, G. M. (1979). Jefferson and Scottish culture. Réflexions historiques, 5(2), 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. ([1914] 1990). Crito, trans. Harold North Fowler. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Plato. ([1930] 1994). Republic, trans. Paul Shorey. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Seneca. ([1935] 2001). On benefits. (Trans. J. W. Basedore). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Sedgwick, J. L. (1997). Jeffersonianism in the progressive era. In G. L. McDowell & S. L. Noble (Eds.), Reason and republicanism: Thomas Jefferson’s legacy of liberty (pp. 189–204). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Andrew Holowchak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holowchak, M.A. The Paradox of Public Service Jefferson, Education, and the Problem of Plato’s Cave. Stud Philos Educ 32, 73–86 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9322-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9322-7

Keywords

Navigation