Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Teachers’ Identity, Self and the Process of Learning

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we try, by drawing on some insights from practical knowledge, to bridge a gap between common conceptions of teaching on the one hand, and of learning on the other. In Western traditions of educational thought and discourse, practical knowledge—i.e. the dynamics of thinking, speaking, acting, and personal writing—is frequently separated from disciplinary knowledge: i.e. the knowledge of academic disciplines. But this separation often fails to recognize an inherent dialectic in teaching and learning. Through fresh explorations of human capacities to act and think, to speak and write, we try to illuminate different aspects of a teacher’s identity, including the teacher’s individuality and the teacher as an agent of an educational institution. The teacher has to present and represent knowledge in education, both as an agent of an institution and as a person. By examining the disclosure and transformation of the self in light of understandings of identity as sameness (i.e. that which doesn’t change with time), or as selfhood (i.e. that which is confronted by successive challenges), we hope to draw some productive conclusions about the teacher’s self-understanding as the source for personal learning in education. We aim to explore the importance of transformation of the teachers’ self for the quality of learning relationships between the teacher and the always Other student.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Ref: White Paper 30 (2003–2004) Culture for Learning.

  2. Ref: http://www.kunnskapsloeftet.no/filer/rundskeng.pdf.

  3. Ref: The National Quality Assessment system, http://odin.dep.no/kd/english/doc/plans/045071-990421/dok-bn.html.

  4. http://www.kunnskapsloeftet.no/filer/rundskeng.pdf.

  5. Ibid.

  6. We use the masculine pronoun to represent the teacher in this text, it could just as well be altered with the feminine.

  7. These perspectives are further elaborated in Hoveid and Hoveid (2007).

Reference

  • Arendt, H. (1989). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benviste, E. (1971). Problems in general linguistics. Florida: University of Miami press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. G. (1988). The importance of what we care about. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoveid, M. H., &. Hoveid, H. (2004). On the possibilities of educating active and reflective teachers. European Educational Research Journal, 3(1), 49–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoveid, M. H., & Hoveid, H. (2007). Research in, on or with practice? In P. Ponte & B. Smit (Eds.), The quality of practitioner research. Reflections on the position of the researcher and the researched. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, P. (2006). Mimesis in educational hermeneutics. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(2), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1967). Husserl an analysis of his phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1982). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1991). From text to action. Essays in hermeneutics, II. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1994). Oneself as another. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Halvor Hoveid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoveid, H., Hoveid, M.H. Teachers’ Identity, Self and the Process of Learning. Stud Philos Educ 27, 125–136 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9095-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9095-6

Keywords

Navigation