Skip to main content
Log in

Applying a Framework for Complementarist Intervention Approaches to Service Organizations to Achieve a Sustainable Holistic Management Model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organizational management often faces complex problem contexts, requiring intervention for improvement. Many intervention approaches exist to achieve a purpose in real world applications. Each intervention approach was developed with a specific world view (weltanschauung), dictating its methods and purpose. In a complex problem context, a single intervention approach is insufficient to address all challenges faced. Combining multiple intervention approaches, bringing differing perspectives, facilitates holistic action. Several methodologies have been developed to combine multiple perspectives, including soft systems methodology (SSM), total systems intervention (TSI), creative design of methods (CDM), and boundary critique. Each of these methods has strengths and weaknesses. A barrier to their use in organizations is the requirement for systems thinking education. This paper presents a framework for defining and selecting approaches for intervention in complex problem contexts. It also provides a method for utilizing this framework to design holistic and effective interventions. A case study is discussed, where the proposed framework and method are applied to a small non-profit service organization that performs knowledge-based work in a dynamic environment. The proposed framework and application method are presented through (1) description of the need, (2) review of contributing literature, (3) presentation of the framework, (4) description of the method, and (5) illustration in the case study organization. Limitations, future development, and scope of applications of the proposed framework and method are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beer S (1981) Brain of the firm: the managerial cybernetics of organization. J. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1984) The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. J Oper Res Soci 35(2):7–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd A, Geerling T, Gregory WJ, Kagan C, Midgley G, Murray P, Walsh MP (2007) Systemic evaluation: a participative, multi-method approach. J Oper Res Soc 58(10):1306–1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (2000) Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Syst Res Behav Sci 17:S11–S58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1970) Operations research as a profession. Management Science 17(2):B-37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH, Prusak L (1998) Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL, Jackson MC (1992) Creative problem solving: total systems intervention. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL, Romm NR (1995) Enhancing the process of methodology choice in total systems intervention (TSI) and improving chances of tackling coercion. Syst Practice 8(4):377–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong PS, Kwok CW (2009) Organizational culture and knowledge management success at project and organizational levels in contracting firms. J Constr Eng Manag 135(12):1348–1356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J 17(S2):109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2001) Critical systems thinking and practice. Eur J Oper Res 128(2):233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2003) Systems thinking: creative holism for managers. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones GR, George JM (2011) Contemporary management, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander E, Liker JK (2007) The Toyota Production System and art: making highly customized and creative products the Toyota way. Int J Prod Res 45(16):3681–3698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC, Oliva R (1998) The greater whole: towards a synthesis of system dynamics and soft systems methodology. Eur J Oper Res 107(1):214–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy FK (1965) Adaptation in the production process. Manag Sci 11(6):B-136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (1992) The sacred and profane in critical systems thinking. Syst Pract 5(1):5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (1997) Developing the methodology of TSI: from the oblique use of methods to creative design. Syst Pract 10(3):305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G, Milne A (1995) Creating employment opportunities for people with mental health problems: a feasibility study for new initiatives. J Oper Res Soc 46(1):35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G, Munlo I, Brown M (1998) The theory and practice of boundary critique: developing housing services for older people. J Oper Res Soci 49(5):467–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J, Taylor S (1992) The use of soft systems methodology in practice. J Oper Res Soc 43(4):321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monden Y (1983) Toyota production system. Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Norcross

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore B, Calvo-Amodio J, and Junker JF (2015) Synthesizing systemic intervention approaches: combining viable system model, knowledge management, and toyota production system for a sustainable holistic management model. Proceedings from 2015 International Society for the Systems Sciences conference, Berlin

  • Nonaka I (1991) The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Bus Rev 69(6):96–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Umemoto K, Senoo D (1996) From information processing to knowledge creation: a paradigm shift in business management. Technol Soc 18(2):203–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OSU Energy Efficiency Center (n.d.). Retrieved from http://eec.oregonstate.edu/

  • Ulrich W (1983) Critical heuristics of social planning: a new approach to practical philosophy. Haupt, Berne

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thank you to the Oregon State University Energy Efficiency Center/Industrial Assessment Center, specifically Joseph Junker, for supporting this research and acting as its subject organization. Thank you to International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS) and American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM) for including this research in their proceedings.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Calvo-Amodio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moore, B., Calvo-Amodio, J. & Junker, J.F. Applying a Framework for Complementarist Intervention Approaches to Service Organizations to Achieve a Sustainable Holistic Management Model. Syst Pract Action Res 30, 487–513 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-016-9403-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-016-9403-6

Keywords

Navigation