Abstract
One paradox of modern society is the widespread use of highly complex mechanisms of economic and social self-regulation which produce a large number of unintended and often undesirable side-effects. Human conceptual systems (theories, policies, and mental models which support our thinking) are good enough to keep the self-regulatory mechanisms in operation; yet they are not good enough to prevent and control the undesirable contingencies. Systems thinking, and complexity science are growing in their usefulness for understanding our social systems as well as our conceptual systems. The present paper examines and explains this paradox by combining the ideas from the burgeoning science of conceptual systems and Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory. Drawing on Luhmann’s argument that social systems build up their internal complexity by disregarding the complexity of the environment, we propose to differentiate between those conceptual systems that reflect the intra-systemic complexity of simpler systems and those that reflect the intra-systemic complexity of sub-systems in combination with systems of systems to include the environmental complexity. Thus it comes about that the former conceptual systems, exemplified by physics, are much more effective and successful than the latter ones, often corresponding to social sciences. The chasm between the qualities of these systems can be overcome by using the tools of Integrative Propositional Analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agafonow A (2015) Value creation, value capture, and value devolution: where do social enterprises stand? Admin Soci 47(8):1038–1060
Allen RGD (1956) Mathematical economics. Macmillan, London
Ariyadasa E, McIntyre-Mills J (2015) Quality of life of Sri Lankan children: participatory action research to address the governance issues of voluntary children’s homes. Syst Pract Action Res 28(5):453–478
Bertalanffy LV (1968) General system theory: foundations, development, applications. Braziller, New York
Boulding K (1984) The organizational revolution: a study in the ethics of economic organization. Greenwood, Westport
Boulding K (1988) Economics as a science. University Press of America, Lanham
Brans M, Rossbach S (1997) The autopoiesis of administrative systems: niklas luhmann on public administration and public policy. Public Admin 75(3):417–439
Burrell G (1997) Pandemonium: towards a retro-organizational theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Cannavale, C., & Wallis, S. E. (2015). The entrepreneurial cultural approach: does culture impact on researchers’ perspective and on entrepreneurial success at a country level. Paper presented at the IACCM—International association for cross-cultural competence and management 14th annual conference and 7th CEMPS/IACCM doctoral workshop, vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, October 1–3
Chatalova L, Müller D, Valentinov V, Balmann A (2016) The rise of the food risk society and the changing nature of the technological treadmill. Sustainability 8(6):584
Cotae CE (2015) Regional performances in the context of a transition towards the circular economy: structuring the assessment framework. Ecoforum 4(1):140–146
Djanibekov N, Van Assche K, Valentinov V (2016) Water governance in Central Asia: a Luhmannian perspective. Soc Natur Resour 29(7):822–835
Dzombak R, Mehta C, Mehta K, Bilén SG (2014) The relevance of systems thinking in the quest for multifinal social enterprises. Syst Pract Action Res 27(6):593–606
Frederick WC (1995) Values, nature, and culture in the American Corporation
Goodwin RM (1951) The nonlinear accelerator and the persistence of business cycles. Econ: J Econ Soc 19:1–17
Habermas J(1987)The theory of communicative action, Volume 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon
Hielscher S, Pies I, Valentinov V, Chatalova L (2016) Rationalizing the GMO debate: the ordonomic approach to addressing agricultural myths. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(5):476
Hill T, Westbrook R (1997) SWOT analysis: it’s time for a product recall. Long Range Plan 30(1):46–52
Imam A, Abbasi AS, Imam H (2014) Why so many ethics in corporate management? Identifying answers using propositional analysis & robustness. J App Environ Biol Sci 4(12):141–154
Kapp KW, Ullmann JE, Preiswerk R(1985). The humanization of the social sciences: University Press of America, Lanham
Kazakov R, Kunc M (2015) Foreseeing the dynamics of strategy: an anticipatory systems perspective. Syst Pract Action Res 29(1):1–25
Leijonhufvud A (1970) Notes on the theory of markets. Intermountain Economic Review 1(1):1–13
Light PC (2016) Vision plus Action = faithful execution: why government daydreams and how to stop the cascade of breakdowns that now haunts it. Politi Sci Polit 49(1):5–26
Luhmann N (1989) Ecological Communication. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Luhmann N (1990) Essays on self-reference. Columbia University Press, New York
Luhmann N (1999) Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
Luhmann N (2009) Einführung in die Systemtheorie. Carl-Auer verlag, Heidelberg
MacIntosh R, MacLean D (1999) Conditioned emergence: a dissipative structures approach to transformation. Strategic Manag J 20(4):297–316
March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87
Phillips AW (1954) Stabilisation policy in a closed economy. Econ J 64:290–323
Rawls J (2009) A theory of justice: Harvard university press, Massachusetts
Richardson GP (1999) Feedback thought in social science and systems theory: Pegasus Communications Inc, Encino
Roth S (2015) Free economy! On 3628800 alternatives of and to capitalism. J Inter Eco 27(2):107–128
Russell D, Wallis SE (2015) Designing a learning analytic system for assessing immersive virtual learning environments. In: Russell D, Laffey J (eds) Handbook of research on gaming trends in P-12 education. Hershey, IGI Global
Senge P, Kleiner K, Roberts S, Ross RB, Smith BJ (1994) The fifth discipline fieldbook: strategies and tools for building a learning organization. Currency Doubleday, New York
Shackelford C (2014) Propositional analysis, policy creation, and complex environments in the United States’ 2009 Afghanistan-Pakistan Policy. Doctoral Dissertation, Walden, Minneapolis, MN
Smith A (1981) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Liberty Fund, Indianopolis
Swanson DL (1999) Business ethics and economics. In: Frederick R (ed) A companion to business ethics. Blackwell, Malden, pp 207–217
Terra LAA, Passador JL (2015) A phenomenological approach to the study of social systems. Syst Pract Action Res 28(6):613–627
Tuan NT, Shaw C (2015) Consideration of ethics in systemic thinking. Syst Pract Action Res 29(1):51–60
Tustin A (1957) The Mechanism of Economic Systems: An approach to the problem of economic stabilization from the point of view of control-system engineering. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Valentinov V (2012) Toward a critical systems perspective on the nonprofit sector. Syst Pract Action Res 25(4):355–364
Valentinov V (2013) Corporate social responsibility and sustainability: insights from Boulding and Luhmann. Int J Sust Dev World 20(4):317–324
Valentinov V (2014a) K. William Kapp’s theory of social costs: a Luhmannian interpretation. Ecol Econ 97:28–33
Valentinov V (2014b) The complexity-sustainability trade-off in Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory. Syst Res Behav Sci 31(1):14–22
Valentinov V (2015a) The Rawlsian critique of utilitarianism: a Luhmannian interpretation. J Bus Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2786-y
Valentinov V (2015b) Kenneth Boulding’s theories of evolutionary economics and organizational change: a reconstruction. J Econ Issues 49(1):71–88
Valentinov V (2015c) Demand, supply, and sustainability: reflections on Kenneth Boulding’s evolutionary economics. Soc Natur Resour 28(11):1216–1232
Valentinov V (2015d) Value devolution in social enterprises: institutional economics and systems theory perspectives. Admin Soc 47(9):1126–1133
Valentinov V (2015e) From equilibrium to autopoiesis: a Luhmannian reading of Veblenian evolutionary economics. Econ Syst 39(1):143–155
Valentinov V, Chatalova L (2014) Transaction costs, social costs, and open systems: some common threads. Syst Res Behav Sci 31(2):316–326
Valentinov V, Chatalova L (2016) Institutional economics and social dilemmas: a systems theory perspective. Syst Res Behav Sci 33(1):138–149
Valentinov V, Hielscher S, Pies I (2015) Nonprofit organizations, institutional economics, and systems thinking. Econ Syst 39(3):491–501
Valentinov V, Hielscher S, Pies, I (2016) Emergence: a systems theory’s challenge to ethics. Syst Pract Action Res. doi:10.1007/s11213-016-9380-9
Valentinov V, Vacekova G (2015) Sustainability of rural nonprofit organizations: Czech Republic and beyond. Sustainability 7(8):9890–9906
Wallis SE (2008) Seeking the robust core of social entrepreneurship theory. In First International Conference on Social Entrepreneurship, Systems Thinking, and Complexity, Garden City
Wallis SE (2009a) The complexity of complexity theory: An innovative analysis. Emerg: Complex Organ 11(4):26–38
Wallis SE (2009b) Seeking the robust core of organisational learning theory. Int J Collab Enterp 1(2):180–193
Wallis SE (2010a) The structure of theory and the structure of scientific revolutions: what constitutes an advance in theory? In: Wallis SE (ed) Cybernetics and systems theory in management: views, tools, and advancements. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 151–174
Wallis SE (2010b) Towards developing effective ethics for effective behavior. Soc Resp J 6(4):536–550
Wallis SE (2010c) Towards the development of more robust policy models. Integral Rev 6(1):153–160
Wallis SE (2011a) Avoiding policy failure: a workable approach. Emergent, Litchfield Park
Wallis SE (2011b) The complexity of complexity theory: an innovative analysis. In: Allen PM, Richardson KA, Goldstein JA (eds) Emergence, complexity and organization: E:CO Annual, vol 11. Emergent, Litchfield Park, pp 179–200
Wallis SE (2012) The right tool for the job: Philosophy’s evolving role in advancing management theory. Philos Manag 11(3):67–99
Wallis SE (2013a) How to choose between policy proposals: a simple tool based on systems thinking and complexity theory. ECO 15(3):94–120
Wallis SE (2013b) Propositional Analysis for Evaluating Explanations through their Conceptual Structures. Paper presented at the International society for complexity and emergence (ISCE) “Modes of Explanation” Paris, France, May 22–24, 2013
Wallis SE (2014a) Abstraction and insight: building better conceptual systems to support more effective social change. Found Sci 19(4):353–362. doi:10.1007/s10699-014-9359-x
Wallis SE (2014b) Evaluating explanations through their conceptual structures. In: Lissack M, Graber A (eds) Modes of explanation: affordances for action and prediction. Palgrave MacMillan, New York
Wallis SE (2014c) Existing and emerging methods for integrating theories within and between disciplines. Organ Transform Soc Change 11(1):3–24
Wallis SE (2014d) A systems approach to understanding theory: finding the core, identifying opportunities for improvement, and integrating fragmented fields. Syst Res Behav Sci 31(1):23–31
Wallis SE (2015a) Are theories of conflict improving? Using propositional analysis to determine the structure of conflict theories over the course of a century. Emerg: Complex Organ 17(4):1–17
Wallis SE (2015b) Integrative propositional analysis: a new quantitative method for evaluating theories in psychology. Rev Gen Psychol 19(3):365–380
Wallis SE (2015c) The science of conceptual systems: a progress report. Found Sci. doi:10.1007/s10699-015-9425-z
Wallis SE (2015d) Structures of logic in policy and theory: identifying sub-systemic bricks for investigating, building, and understanding conceptual systems. Found Sci 20:213. doi:10.1007/s10699-014-9360-4
Wallis S, Valentinov V (2016) What is sustainable theory? A Luhmannian perspective on the science of conceptual systems. Found Sci. doi:10.1007/s10699-016-9496-5
Wallis SE, Wright B (2015a) SciPolicy Watchdogs: new ways to evaluate policy, anticipate problems, and predict results. Paper presented at the AAAS (The American Association for the Advancement of Science) conference, Feb 12–16, San Jose
Wallis SE, Wright B (2015b) Strategic Knowledge Mapping: the co-creation of useful knowledge. In Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning (ABSEL) 42nd annual conference, Las Vegas, CA, Mar 4–6 2015 (Vol. 42, Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning)
Wallis SE, Wright B, Nash FD (2016) Using integrative propositional analysis to evaluate and integrate economic policies of U.S. Presidential Candidates White paper
Wiener N (1989) The human use of human beings: cybernetics and society, vol 320. Free Association Books, London
Wright B, Wallis SE (2015) Using integrative propositional analysis (IPA) for evaluating entrepreneurship theories. SAGE Open 5(3):1–9. doi:10.1177/2158244015604190
Acknowledgment
This paper began with a project supported by the Fulbright Specialist Program and IAMO. The authors wish to express their appreciation for these excellent organizations. The second author gratefully acknowledges the support from the Volkswagen Foundation. The authors are grateful to anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wallis, S.E., Valentinov, V. A Limit to Our Thinking and Some Unanticipated Moral Consequences: A Science of Conceptual Systems Perspective with Some Potential Solutions. Syst Pract Action Res 30, 103–116 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-016-9394-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-016-9394-3