Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Injustice in School and Students’ Emotions, Well-Being, and Behavior: A Longitudinal study

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

School can be regarded as an important factor in the development of children’s values and attitudes. Given this great importance of justice experiences for students’ development, this study aimed at examining the influence of perceived injustice in school on students’ emotions, well-being, and behavior with an experimental longitudinal design. In total, 196 students participated in this study and came to the university with their classes to receive extra teaching once a week for six consecutive weeks. To manipulate justice perceptions, a scenario of arbitrary privilege was chosen to lead students of the experimental group to experience injustice from a beneficiary perspective. We found that students in the experimental group reported higher well-being and a higher appreciation of the opportunity to learn than the control group did. Additionally, they showed an increase in justice-related negative emotions over time; that is, they expressed more of a bad conscience and stronger feelings of anger the more they became aware of their privilege. This study shows that even subtle experiences of injustice in school can have an impact on students’ outcomes. These results are discussed with regard to practical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The same procedure was used for all multi-level analyses. For all analyses it was appropriate to adopt a random intercept model.

References

  • Anderson, C. S. (1982). The search for school climate: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 368–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, A., Beierlein, C., Schmitt, M., Kemper, C.J., Kovaleva, A., Liebig, S., & Rammstedt, B. (2014). Measuring four perspectives of justice sensitivity with two items each. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(3), 380–390. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.836526.

  • Baumert, A., Halmburger, A., & Schmitt, M. (2013). Intervention against norm violations: Dispositional determinants of self-reported and real moral courage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(8), 1053–1068.

  • Chory-Assad, R. M. (2002). Classroom justice: Perceptions of fairness as a predictor of student motivation, learning, and aggression. Communication Quarterly, 50, 58–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chory-Assad, R. M., & Paulsel, M. L. (2004). Antisocial classroom communication: Instructor influence and interactional justice as predictors of student aggression. Communication Quarterly, 52, 98–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1993). Schools and social justice. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalbert, C. (2011). Übersichtsarbeit. Warum die durch die Schüler und Schülerinnen individuell und subjektiv erlebte Gerechtigkeit des Lehrerhandelns wichtig ist. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalbert, C. (2013). Gerechtigkeit in der Schule. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s view on a decade of paradigm wars. The Academy of Management Review, 21, 619–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1979). Education and distributive justice: Some reflections on grading systems. American Psychologist, 34, 301–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dion, K. L., & Dion, K. K. (1987). Belief in a just world and physical attractiveness stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 775–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donat, M., Umlauft, S., Dalbert, C., & Kamble, S. V. (2012). Belief in a just world, teacher justice, and bullying behavior. Aggressive Behaviour, 38, 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Siegel, E. M. (2012). Reactions to organizational injustice: Counter work be-haviors and the insider threat. In E. Kals & J. Maes (Eds.), Justice and Conflicts (pp. 199–217). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, M., Schmitt, M., Schalke, R., Maes, J., & Baer, A. (2005). Asymmetrical effects of justice sensitivity perspectives on prosocial and antisocial behavior. Social Justice Research, 18(2), 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, G. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gummerum, M., Hanoch, Y., Keller, M., Parsons, K., & Hummel, A. (2010). Preschoolers’ allocations in the dictator game: The role of moral emotions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(1), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice. American Sociological Review, 45, 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickul, J., Gundry, L. K., & Posig, M. (2005). Does trust matter? The relationship between equity sensitivity and perceived organizational justice. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(3), 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Markovsky, B. (1985). Toward a multilevel justice theory. American Sociological Review, 50, 822–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 247–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelissen, R. M. A., & Zeelenberg, M. (2009). When guilt evokes self-punishment: Evidence for the existence of a Dobby effect. Emotion, 9(1), 118–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resh, N., & Sabbagh, C. (2014). Sense of justice in school and civic attitudes. Social Psychology of Education, 17, 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Maes, J. (2010). The justice sensitivity inventory: Factorial validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data. Social Justice Research, 23(2–3), 211–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J., & Arbach, D. (2005). Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 202–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tata, J. (1999). Grade distributions, grading procedures, and students’ evaluations of instructors: A justice perspective. The Journal of Psychology, 133, 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorkildsen, T. A. (1989). Justice in the classroom: The student’s view. Child Development, 60, 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos, K., Maas, M., Waldring, I. E., & Semin, G. R. (2003). Toward understanding the psychology of reactions to perceived fairness: The role of affect intensity. Social Justice Research, 16(2), 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johanna Pretsch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pretsch, J., Ehrhardt, N., Engl, L. et al. Injustice in School and Students’ Emotions, Well-Being, and Behavior: A Longitudinal study. Soc Just Res 29, 119–138 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-015-0234-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-015-0234-x

Keywords

Navigation