Social Justice Research

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 1–17

The Role of Legitimizing Ideologies as Predictors of Ambivalent Sexism in Young People: Evidence from Italy and the USA

  • Cristina Mosso
  • Giovanni Briante
  • Antonio Aiello
  • Silvia Russo
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11211-012-0172-9

Cite this article as:
Mosso, C., Briante, G., Aiello, A. et al. Soc Just Res (2013) 26: 1. doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0172-9

Abstract

The studies presented here focus on the relationship between legitimizing ideologies and ambivalent sexism. 544 Italian students (Study 1) and 297 US students (Study 2) completed several scales: social dominance orientation (SDO), system justification (SJ), political orientation, religiosity, and the Glick and Fiske (J Pers Soc Psychol 70(3):491–512, 1996) Ambivalent Sexism Inventory. Zero-order correlations revealed all facets of ideological attitudes to be positively related to each other and correlated with ambivalent sexism. In particular, the SDO was related to both ideology components of SJ and political orientation and to ambivalent sexism (hostile and benevolent). Moderated regressions revealed that SDO has a positive impact on hostile sexism for men only, while SJ has a positive impact on hostile sexism for women only. While the first result was stable across the two studies, the last moderated effect has been detected only in Study 1. We discuss the results with respect to different facets of social ideologies and cultural differences between the two countries.

Keywords

System justification Social dominance orientation Ambivalent sexism Conservative ideology 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristina Mosso
    • 1
  • Giovanni Briante
    • 1
  • Antonio Aiello
    • 2
  • Silvia Russo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TorinoTurinItaly
  2. 2.University of CagliariCagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations