Abstract
Paleo-cosmic-ray (PCR) records based on cosmogenic 10Be and 14C data are used to study the variations in cosmic-ray intensity and solar activity over the past 9400 years. There are four strong correlations with the motion of the Jovian planets; the probability of occurring by chance being < 10−5. They are i) the PCR periodicities at 87, 350, 510, and 710 years, which closely approximate integer multiples of half the Uranus–Neptune synodic period; ii) eight periodicities in the torques calculated to be exerted by the planets on an asymmetric tachocline that approximate the periods observed in the PCR; iii) the maxima of the long-term PCR variations are coincident with syzygy (alignment) of the four Jovian planets in 5272 and 644 BP; and iv) in the time domain, the PCR intensity decreases during the first 60 years of the ≈ 172 year Jose cycle (Jose, Astron. J. 70, 193, 1965) and increases in the remaining ≈ 112 years in association with barycentric anomalies in the distance between the Sun and the center of mass of the solar system. Furthermore, sunspot and neutron-monitor data show that three anomalous sunspot cycles (4th, 7th, and 20th) and the long sunspot minimum of 2006 – 2009 CE coincided with the first and second barycentric anomalies of the 58th and 59th Jose cycles. Phase lags between the planetary and heliospheric effects are ≤ five years. The 20 largest Grand Minima during the past 9400 years coincided with the latter half of the Jose cycle in which they occurred. These correlations are not of terrestrial origin, nor are they due to the planets’ contributing directly to the cosmic-ray modulation process in the heliosphere. Low cosmic-ray intensity (higher solar activity) occurred when Uranus and Neptune were in superior conjunction (mutual cancellation), while high intensities occurred when Uranus–Neptune were in inferior conjunction (additive effects). Many of the prominent peaks in the PCR Fourier spectrum can be explained in terms of the Jose cycle, and the occurrence of barycentric anomalies.
References
Abreu, J.A., Beer, J., Ferriz-Mas, A., McCracken, K.G., Steinhilber, F.: 2012, Is there a planetary influence on solar activity? Astron. Astrophys. 548, A88. 10.1051/ooo4-6361/201219997 .
Beer, J., McCracken, K., von Steiger, R.: 2012, Cosmogenic Radionuclides: Theory and Applications in the Terrestrial and Space Environments, Springer, Berlin. ISBN 978-3-642-14650-3.
Beer, J., McCracken, K.G., Abreu, J., Heikkila, U., Steinhilber, F.: 2011, Cosmogenic radionuclides as an extension of the neutron monitor era into the past: potential and limitations Space Sci. Rev.. 10.1007/s11214-011-9843-3 .
Cameron, R.H., Schüssler, M.: 2013, No evidence for planetary influence on solar activity Astron. Astrophys. 557A, 83C. 10.1051/0004-6361/201321713 .
Charvatova, I.: 2000, Can origin of the 2400-year cycle of solar activity be caused by solar inertial motion. Ann. Geophys. 18, 399.
Cliver, E.W., Siscoe, G.L.: 1994, History of the discovery of the solar wind. EOS 75, 139.
Dicke, R.H.: 1978, Is there a chronometer hidden deep in the Sun. Nature 276, 676.
Eddy, J.A.: 1976, The Maunder Minimum. Science 192, 1189.
Fairbridge, R.W., Shirley, J.H.: 1987, Prolonged minima and the 179-yr cycle of the solar inertial motion. Solar Phys. 110, 191. 10.1007/BF00148211 .
Gleeson, L.J., Axford, W.I.: 1968, Solar modulation of Galactic Cosmic Rays. Astrophys. J. 154, 1011 – 1026. 10.1086/149822 , 1968ApJ...154.1011G .
Jokipii, J.R.: 1991, Variations of the cosmic-ray flux with time. In: Sonett, C.P., Giampapa, M.S., Mathews, M.S. (eds.) The Sun in Time, Univ. Ariz. Press, Tucson, 205.
Jose, P.D.: 1965, Sun’s motion and sunspots. Astron. J. 70, 193.
Kelvin, W.T.: 1892, Presidential address to Roy. Soc. (London). Nature 47, 109.
Lal, D.: 1987, 10Be in polar ice: data reflect changes in cosmic ray flux or polar meteorology. Geophys. Res. Lett. 14, 785.
Livingston, W.C., Penn, M.J.: 2009, Are sunspots different during this sunspot minimum? EOS 90, 257.
McCracken, K.G., McDonald, F.B., Beer, J., Raisbeck, G., Yiou, F.: 2004, A phenomenological study of the long-term cosmic ray modulation, 850 – 1950 AD. J. Geophys. Res. 109, A12103. 10.1029/2004JA010685 .
McCracken, K., Beer, J., Steinhilber, F., Abreu, J.: 2011, The heliosphere in time. Space Sci. Rev. 10.1007/s11214-011-9843-3 .
McCracken, K.G., Beer, J., Steinhilber, F., Abreu, J.: 2013, A phenomenological study of the cosmic ray variations over the past 9400 years, and their implications regarding solar activity and the solar dynamo. Solar Phys. 286, 609. 10.1007/s11297-013-0265-0 .
McDonald, F.B.: 1998, Cosmic ray modulation in the heliosphere. Space Sci. Rev. 83, 33.
McDonald, F.B., Webber, W.R., Reames, D.V.: 2010, Unusual time histories of galactic and anomalous cosmic rays at 1 AU over the deep solar minimum of cycle 23/24 Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L18101.
Parker, E.N.: 1958, Dynamics of the interplanetary gas and magnetic fields. Astrophys. J. 128(3), 664.
Parker, E.N.: 2000, The physics of the sun and the gateway to the stars. Phys. Today 53, 26.
Peristykh, A.N., Damon, P.E.: 2003, Persistence of the Gleissberg 88-year solar cycle over the past ∼ 12,000 years: evidence from cosmogenic isotopes. J. Geophys. Res. 108(A1), 1003. 10.1029/2002JA009390 .
Reimer, P.J., Baillie, M.G.L., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J.W., Blackwell, P.G., Ramsey, C.B., Buck, C.E., Burr, G.S., Edwards, R.L., Friedrich, M., Grootes, P.M., Guilderson, T.P., Hajdas, I., Heaton, T.J., Hogg, A.G., Hughen, K.A., Kaiser, K.F., Kromer, B., McCormac, F.G., Manning, S.W., Reimer, R.W., Richards, D.A., Southon, J.R., Talamo, S., Turney, C.S.M., van der Plicht, J., Weyhenmeye, C.E.: 2009, Intcal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0 – 50,000 years Cal Bp. Radiocarbon 51, 1111.
Schrijver, C.J., DeRosa, M.L., Title, A.M.: 2002, What is missing from our understanding of long-term solar and heliospheric activity? Astrophys. J. 577, 1006.
Sharp, G.J.: 2013, Are Uranus and Neptune responsible for solar grand minima and solar cycle modulation? Int. J. Astron. Astrophys. 3, 260. 10.4236/ijaa.2013.33031 .
Solanki, S.K., Schüssler, M., Fligge, M.: 2002, Secular variation of the Sun’s magnetic flux. Astron. Astrophys. 383, 706.
Sonett, C.P.: 1984, Very long solar periods and the radiocarbon record. Rev. Geophys. 22, 239.
Steinhilber, F., Abreu, J.A., Beer, J., McCracken, K.G.: 2010, The interplanetary magnetic field during the past 9300 years inferred from cosmogenic radionuclides. J. Geophys. Res. 115, A01104. 10.1029/2009JA014193 .
Steinhilber, F., Abreu, J.A., Beer, J., Brunner, I., Christl, M., Fischer, H., Heikkilä, U., Kubik, P.W., Mann, M., McCracken, K.G., Miller, H., Miyahara, H., Oerter, H., Wilhelms, F.: 2012, 9,400 years of cosmic radiation and solar activity from ice cores and tree rings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109. 10.1073/pnas1118965109 .
Stuiver, M., Quay, P.D.: 1980, Changes in atmospheric carbon-14 attributable to a variable Sun. Science 207, 11.
Usoskin, I.G., Mursala, K., Kovaltsov, G.A.: 2002, Lost sunspot cycle in the beginning of the Dalton Minimum – new evidence and consequences. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 2183. 10.1029/2002GL015640 .
Usoskin, I.G., Mursala, K., Arit, R., Kovaltsov, G.A.: 2009, A solar cycle lost in 1793 – 1800: early sunspot observations resolve the old mystery. Astrophys. J. Lett. 700, L154.
Wang, Y.-M., Lean, J., Sheeley, N.R.: 2002, Role of a variable meridional flow in the secular evolution of the Sun’s polar fields and open flux. Astrophys. J. Lett. 577, L53.
Webber, W.R., Higbie, P.R.: 2010, What Voyager cosmic ray data in the outer heliosphere tells us about 10Be production in the Earth’s polar atmosphere in the recent past. J. Geophys. Res. 115(A5), A05102. 10.1029/2009JA014532 , 2010JGRA..115.5102W .
Wilson, I.R.G.: 2006, Possible evidence of the de Vries, Gleissberg and Hale cycles in the Sun’s barycentric motion. Proc. Austral. Inst. Phys. Paper 625.
Wilson, I.R.G., Carter, B.D., Waite, I.A.: 2008, Does a spin-orbit coupling between the Sun and the Jovian planets govern the solar cycle. Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 25, 85.
Acknowledgements
The research at the University of Maryland was supported by the US NSF grant 1050002. KGMcC thanks the International Space Science Institute, Bern, Switzerland for their on-going support. The research at Eawag was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation under grant CRSI122- 130642 (FUPSOL) and by NCCR Climate – Swiss climate research. KGMcC thanks Ian Wilson for advice and tuition on planetary matters.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 A.1. Properties of the Jose Cycle
Jose (1965) examined the periodic motion that the Sun executes about the center of mass of the solar system (the barycenter). Based on his calculations for the interval 1655 – 2012, he estimated the period of this motion to be 178 years. As outlined below, we have used the position of the barycenter for the interval 9337 BP to 10 000 years in the future, as given by the NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory Ephemeris DE-408 J2000 (see Abreu et al., 2012, for more details). Note that the barycenter we used includes the effects of all the planets, but it is easily shown that the four Jovian planets provide the dominant effect. Thus the small planets (Mercury through Mars) contribute < 2×10−3 solar radii to the position of the barycenter, while the combined effects of the Jovian planets are in the range 2>R b≥0.15 solar radii. Identifying the ordered (quasi-sinusoidal) phases throughout this interval of 19 339 years, we conclude that a sequence of 97 Jose cycles lasted for a total of 16 635 years. From this we conclude that the long-term average Jose period is 171.49±0.21 years. Independently, Sharp (2013) has concluded that the Jose period is ≈ 172 years averaged over the past 6000 years. For the purposes of this article, we defined the first Jose cycle to commence at the start of the ordered phase in 10 332 BP. This places the modern era in the 59th Jose cycle.
1.2 A.2. Calculations of Probabilities
-
i)
Correlation with the Uranus–Neptune synodic period. Figure 2 shows an apparent agreement between the four observed consensus periodicities in Table 1 and the four harmonically related periods T=N(T UN/2) years, where N are the integers 1, 4, 6, and 8, and where T UN is the Uranus–Neptune (U–N) synodic period of 171.42 years (see Section 2). We assess here the statistical probability that this same correlation has occurred by chance independently for both the 10Be and 14C records. We performed this analysis in the frequency domain for the ten periodicities observed in the range 40<T<1000 years in both the 10Be and 14C data, as listed in Table 1. The resolution of the Fourier analyses is independent of frequency, being 2.12×10−4 cycles year−1 for a sample length of 9400 years. T UN/2 corresponds to a frequency of 116.67×10−4 cycles year−1. For the 10Be data, we divided the frequency range 10×10−4<f<250×10−4 cycles per year into 60 equal bins in frequency space, each of width 4×10−4 cycles year−1, and identified the four bins containing the four frequencies given by N=1, 4, 6, and 8. Assuming white noise, a noise-derived period has equal probability of falling into any of the 60 bins. For 10Be, we then used binomial statistics to compute the probability [P]=2.7×10−3 that the four periods in Figure 2 (out of a total of ten observed periods) fell within the bins corresponding to N=1, 4, 6, and 8. The sequestration processes for 10Be and 14C are different, and these data therefore represent independent measurements of the cosmic radiation intensity in the past. Table 1 shows that similar periods (within the resolution of the Fourier analyses) were observed in the 10Be and 14C data. In the case of 14C we used 40 frequency bins of width 6×10−4 cycles year−1. The probability that the four observed periods in the 14C data would fall in the bins corresponding to the periods P=N (T UN/2) was computed to be P=1.1×10−2. The independence of the meteorological, climate and measurement noise in the 10Be and 14C therefore indicates that there is a probability of <10−4 that the same four periods, N×(T UN/2), would occur in the ten periodicities observed in the two independent data streams between 40 and 1000 years.
-
ii)
Correlation of the Hallstatt spectral peak [2310 years] with the repetition period of syzygy of the Jovian planets (Grand Jovian Alignment − Section 4). Working in the frequency domain as above, we defined bins of width 2×10−4 cycles year−1 for both the 10Be and 14C data for the interval 1000<T<5000 years. For white noise, the probability that the Hallstatt periodicity would coincide with the independently known repetition period of the Grand Jovian Alignments by chance for 10Be and 14C individually is then 0.2, and for both 4×10−2.
1.3 A.3. Astronomical Quantities and Terms
-
i)
The synodic period [T s] of planets 1 and 2 is given by 1/T s=1/T 1−1/T 2. The periods of the planets are known to a precision of one part in 105 out to Saturn, and one in 104 for Uranus and Neptune. For the latter, T s=171.42 years. For Jupiter and Saturn, T s=19.858 years. The sidereal periods used here were Jupiter =11.862 years; Saturn=29.457 years; Uranus=84.02 years; and Neptune=164.79 years.
-
ii)
Syzygy: a straight-line configuration of three or more planets and the Sun.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCracken, K.G., Beer, J. & Steinhilber, F. Evidence for Planetary Forcing of the Cosmic Ray Intensity and Solar Activity Throughout the Past 9400 Years. Sol Phys 289, 3207–3229 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0510-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0510-1