Abstract
Recently Pop (Solar Phys. 276, 351, 2012) identified a Laplace (or double exponential) distribution in the number of days with a given absolute value in the change over a day, in sunspot number, for days on which the sunspot number does change. We show this phenomenological rule has a physical origin attributable to sunspot formation, evolution, and decay, rather than being due to the changes in sunspot number caused by groups rotating onto and off the visible disc. We also demonstrate a simple method to simulate daily sunspot numbers over a solar cycle using the Pop (Solar Phys. 276, 351, 2012) result, together with a model for the cycle variation in the mean sunspot number. The procedure is applied to three recent solar cycles. We check that the simulated sunspot numbers reproduce the observed distribution of daily changes over those cycles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Sunspot data are compiled by the US National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC), and are available at http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/solar/ssndata.html . The NGDC data are used throughout in this paper.
Data are available at http://ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/solar/sunspotregionsdata.html .
As noted in Section 2, the adherence of the overall sunspot number to an exponential distribution is only very approximate (by comparison with the observed distribution of changes in daily sunspot number, which follows the Laplace distribution quite strictly).
References
Bogdan, T.J., Gilman, P.A., Lerche, I., Howard, R.: 1988, Astrophys. J. 327, 451.
Bruzek, A., Durrant, C.J.: 1977, Illustrated Glossary for Solar and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 70.
Committee on the Societal and Economic Impacts of Severe Space Weather Events: 2008, Severe Space Weather Events: Understanding Societal and Economic Impacts, The National Academies Press, Washington.
Eliason, S.R.: 1993, Maximum Likelihood Estimation; Logic and Practice, Sage, London, 8.
Gillespie, D.T.: 1992, Markov Processes, Academic Press, San Diego, 375.
Gizon, L., Birch, A.C.: 2005, Living Rev. Solar Phys. 2(6). http://solarphysics.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrsp-2005-6/ .
Gnevyshev, M.N.: 1967, Solar Phys. 1, 107.
Hathaway, D.H., Wilson, R.M., Reichmann, E.J.: 1994, Solar Phys. 151, 177 (HWR94).
Lepreti, F., Kossobokov, V.G., Carbone, V.: 2009, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 23, 5609.
Noble, P.L., Wheatland, M.S.: 2011, Astrophys. J. 732, 5.
Noble, P.L., Wheatland, M.S.: 2012, Solar Phys. 276, 363.
Petrovay, K.: 2010, Living Rev. Solar Phys. 7(6), http://solarphysics.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrsp-2010-6/ .
Pop, M.-I.: 2012, Solar Phys. 276, 351.
Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P.: 1992, Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 710.
Solanki, S.K.: 2003, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 11, 153.
Thomas, J.H., Weiss, N.O.: 1991 In: Thomas, J.H., Weiss, N.O. (eds.) Sunspots: Theory and Observations, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 3.
Tobias, S.M.: 2002, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A 360, 2741.
Snodgrass, H.B., Ulrich, R.K.: 1990, Astrophys. J. 351, 309.
Acknowledgements
P. N. gratefully acknowledges a University of Sydney Postgraduate Scholarship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Noble, P.L., Wheatland, M.S. Origin and Use of the Laplace Distribution in Daily Sunspot Numbers. Sol Phys 282, 565–578 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-012-0155-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-012-0155-x