Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utilization of Quality Source of Prenatal-Care in India: An Evidence from IDHS

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

India is committed to Millennium Development Goals regarding prenatal health but still the utilization of quality source of prenatal-care is lacking. In this paper an attempt has been made to examine the socioeconomic determinants of utilization of quality source of prenatal-care by the women in the age group of 15–49 years. Micro data having 25,896 observations from Indian Demographic Health Survey 2006 has been used. Binary logistic regression analysis is utilized to determine the association between the utilization of quality source of prenatal-care and explanatory variables categorized into demographic, socioeconomic, health and regional characteristics. Quality source of prenatal-care is defined as the prenatal-care taken from medical expert. The results have shown that age of woman at first marriage, husband’s age, woman’s education, husband’s education, final say on woman’s health-care by woman and husband collectively and husband alone, wealth index, female head of household, ever terminated pregnancy, household covered by insurance and husband’s presence during prenatal visits increase the probability of utilization of quality source of prenatal-care. However, the combined family structure, birth-order of the child and living of the household in the town as compared the capital and large city decrease the probability of utilization of quality source of prenatal-care by Indian women. The implementation of law of minimum age for marriage, expansion in maternal health insurance, participation of husband in prenatal-care are proposed for enhancing the utilization of quality source of prenatal-care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See for instance, number of visits (Beeckman et al. 2010; Ye et al. 2010; Tran et al. 2011, 2012; Habibov 2011), the prenatal-care services taken from medical specialist (Titlay et al. 2010; Beeckman et al. 2010; Alemayehu et al. 2010; Sadiq et al. 2011), initiation of prenatal care at proper time (Ye et al. 2010; Tran et al. 2011, 2012; Habibov 2011), prenatal-care services provided by health-care providers (Sarkar et al. 2010; Nyemtema et al. 2012; Tran et al. 2012), parameters/components of prenatal-care (Yousaf et al. 2010; Sarkar et al. 2010; Nyemtema et al. 2012), index of quality of prenatal-care (Lavado et al. 2010), adequate use: early first visit, sufficient number of visits and all core services (Tran et al. 2012).

  2. The number of visits is diverse and not evidence-based. There is no consensus about the optimal number of visits. For instance, it ranges from a minimum of 6 in the Netherlands to 15 in Finland. In Belgium 10 visits for primiparae and about 7 for multiparae are advised. In the developing economies, 3 and 4 prenatal visits are advised in Indonesia and Vietnam respectively. In India only 3 visits are proposed by Reproductive and Child Health Program.

  3. Barber (2006) evidenced that women who receive care from medical doctors take more prenatal care items than those who receive care from nurse, midwife and traditional health-care providers (see also Barber et al. 2007; Lavado et al. 2010).

  4. Although the components of prenatal-care are important from the quality as well as policy perspectives.

  5. At the time of publication of this article possibly the time to achieve the target would have been reached so the recommendation of this paper would not be able to contribute to achieve the target. However, as a number of studies have forecasted and figures of maternal mortality ratio express, the target would not be achieved and further time frame would be required. So the policy proposals from this research may be helpful for the next target in a new time frame.

  6. If a woman received prenatal-care from more than one type of health providers, only the provider with the highest qualification has been taken.

  7. All these factors are demand side factors while the supply side aspect is equally important. Not only the proper supply of quality of prenatal-care but also at reasonable and affordable rate.

  8. All the variables included in this analysis are demand side variables based on Newman’s demand for health model. The supply side variables like distance from home to medical expert, numbers of hospitals and numbers of doctors are equally important for utilization of quality source of prenatal-care.

  9. It supports the notion that economic growth with not increasing in inequality at the national level is directly related with the maternal health of the women.

References

  • Alemayehu, T., Haider, J., & Habte, D. (2010). Utilization of antenatal care services among teenagers in Ethiopia: A cross sectional study. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development, 24(3), 221–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, R., & Newman, J. F. (1973). Social and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 51, 95–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, S. L. (2006). Public and private prenatal care providers in urban Mexico: How does their quality compare? International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 18(4), 306–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, S. L., Bertozzi, S. M., & Gertler, P. J. (2007). Variation in prenatal care quality for rural poor in Mexico. Health Affairs, 26(3), 310–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeckman, K., Louckx, F., & Putman, K. (2010). Determinants of number of antenatal visits in metropolitan region. BMC Public Health, 10, 527–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camacho, A., & Conover, E. (2013). Effects of subsidized health insurance on newborn health in a developing country. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 61(3), 633–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dairo, M. D., & Owoyokun, K. E. (2010). Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care services in Ibadan, Nigeria. Benin Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 12(1), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb, A., & Sosa-Rubi, S. G. (2005). Does onset or quality of prenatal care matter more for infant health? Health Econometrics and Data Group, Working paper no. 05/11, University of York.

  • Donabedian, A. (1980). The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donabedian, A. (1986). Research on the quality of medical care. Salud Publica de Mexico, 28(3), 324–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care: How can it be assessed? JAMA, 260(12), 1743–1748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donabedian, A. (2005). Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 83(4), 691–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M. (1972). On the concept of health capital and demand for health. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2), 223–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habibov, N. N. (2011). On the socioeconomic determinants of antenatal care utilization in Azerbaijan: Evidence and policy implications for reforms. Health Economics Policy and Law, 6, 175–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaestner, R. (1999). Health insurance, the quantity and quality of prenatal care, and infant health. Inquiry, 36, 162–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, R. E. A., & Raza, M. A. (2013a). Maternal health-care in India: The case of tetanus toxoid vaccination. Asian Development Policy Review, 1(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, R. E. A., & Raza, M. A. (2013b). Maternal health-care: The case of iron supplementation in India. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 7(2), 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavado, R. F., Lagrada, L. P., Ulep, V. G. T., & Tan, L. M. (2010). Who provides good quality prenatal care in Philippines? Discussion paper no. 2010-18, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

  • Nwaru, B. I., Wu, Z., & Hemminki, E. (2012). Determinants of the use of prenatal-care in rural China: The role of care contents. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 16(1), 235–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyemtema, A. S., Jong, A. B., Urassa, D. P., Haagen, J. P., & Roosmalen, J. V. (2012). The quality of antenatal care in rural Tanzania: What is behind the number of visits? BMC Pregnancy Child Birth, 12, 70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odimegwu, C., Adewuyi, A., Odebiyi, T., Aina, B., Adesina, Y., Olatubara, O., et al. (2005). Men’s role in emergency obstetric care in Osun State of Nigeria. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 9(3), 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, M. M., Islam, M. R., & Islam, A. Z. (2008). Rural urban differentials of antenatal health care services in Bangladesh. Health Policy Development, 6(3), 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq, N., Waheed, Q., Hussain, M., Rana, A. T., Yousaf, Z., Chaudary, Z., et al. (2011). Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care among women of reproductive age in Nurpur Shahan. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, 61(6), 616–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, M., Schmid, G., Larsson, E., Kirenga, S., Allegri, M. D., Neuhann, F., et al. (2010). Quality of antenatal care in rural Southern Tanzania: A reality check. BMC Research Notes, 3, 209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sword, W., Heaman, M. I., Brooks, S., Tough, S., Janssen, P. A., Young, D., et al. (2012). Women’s and care providers’ perspectives of quality prenatal care: A qualitative descriptive study. BMC Pregnancy and Child Birth, 12, 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titlay, C., Michal, R., Dibley, J., & Roberts, C. L. (2010). Factors associated with underutilization of antenatal care services in Indonesia: Results of Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey 2002/2003 and 2007. BMC Public Health, 10, 485–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, T. K., Gottval, K., Nguyen, H. D., Ascher, H., & Petzold, M. (2012). Factors associated with antenatal care adequacy in rural and urban context—results from two Health and Demographic Surveillance sites in Vietnam. BMC Health Services Research, 12, 40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, T. K., Nguyen, C. T. K., Nguyen, H. D., Eriksson, B. O., Bondjers, G., Gottval, K., et al. (2011). Urban rural disparities in antenatal care utilization: A study of two cohorts of pregnant women in Vietnam. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varkey, L. C., Mishra, A., Das, A., Ottolenghi, E., Huntington, D., Adamchak, S., et al. (2004). Involving men in maternity care in India. New Delhi: Frontiers in Reproductive Health Programs, Population Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2004). WHO recommended interventions for improving maternal and newborn health. World Health Organization (WHO). Geneva: WHO Press.

  • Ye, Y., Yoshid, Y., Rashid, H., & Sakamoto, J. (2010). Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care services among women in Khan District, Xiengkhoung Province, Lao PDR. Nagoya Medical Journal, 72, 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ying, C., Li, Y., & Hui, H. (2011). The impact of husbands’ gender equity awareness on wives’ reproductive health in rural areas of China. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 66(2), 103–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousaf, F., Haider, G., & Shaikh, R. B. (2010). Factors for inaccessibility of antenatal care by women in Sindh. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, 22(4), 187–189.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rana Ejaz Ali Khan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, R.E.A., Raza, M.A. Utilization of Quality Source of Prenatal-Care in India: An Evidence from IDHS. Soc Indic Res 131, 1163–1178 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1286-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1286-5

Keywords

Navigation