Skip to main content
Log in

Marriage and Subjective Well-Being: How and Why Context Matters

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last 20 years the academic community has experienced a burgeoning interest in the causes and correlates of subjective well-being. One of the most consistent findings has been that married respondents report higher levels of happiness and life satisfaction than unmarried respondents. Despite its prevalence, scant empirical research has focused on the potential mechanisms driving this relationship. The current work draws on the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System along with 2000 US Census data to investigate the role of context and reference groups in shaping the relationship between marriage and well-being. The primary research question is whether marriage has a greater influence on life satisfaction when it is more common and thus more normative? The findings offer new insight into the marriage/well-being relationship and have broad implication for how we think about the study of the causes and correlates of subjective well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As the size of the reference group may also be influential, I reran all of the models separately for small, medium, and large, as well as urban and rural counties. There were no substantive differences in the findings across the different sized or type of counties.

References

  • Antonovics, K., & Town, R. (2004). Are all the good men married? Uncovering the sources of the marital wage premium. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 317–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aughinbaugh, A., O. Robles, & Hugette, S. (2013) Marriage and divorce: patterns by gender, race and educational attainment. Monthly Labor Review. http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2013/article/marriage-and-divorce-patterns-by-gender-race-and-educational-attainment.htm

  • Bellas, M. L. (1992). The effects of marital status and wives’ employment on the salaries of faculty men: The (house) wife bonus. Gender and Society, 6(4), 609–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, J., Lawton, C. A., & Vartanian, L. R. (2005). I can’t wait to get married: Gender differences in drive to marry. Sex Roles, 53, 327–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Money, sex and happiness: An empirical study”. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 393–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006). Behavioral risk factors surveillance system. Operational and user’s guide, version 3.0.

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). Behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Atlanta, GA: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/

  • Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The marriage-go-around: The state of marriage and family in America today. New York, NY: Random House Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, T. D., & Collins, B. E. (2002). Gender, relationship status, and stereotyping about sexual risk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1483–1494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connidis, I. A. (2001). Family ties and aging. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2005). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 57–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., & Peasgood, T. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramowitz. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal, 111, 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19), 11176–11183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggebeen, D., & Dew, J. (2009). The role of religion in adolescence for family formation in young adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(1), 108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firebaugh, G., & Tach, L. (2008). Income, age and happiness in America. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Social trends in the United States 1972–2006: Evidence from the General Social Survey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110, 918–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2005). Happiness research: State and prospects. Review of Social Economy, 63(2), 207–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fussel, E., & Furstenberg, F. (2005). The transition to adulthood during the twentieth century: Race, nativity, and gender. In R. A. Settersten, F. F. Furstenberg, & R. G. Rumbaut (Eds.), On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C., & Pettinato, S. (2002). Frustrated achievers: Winners, losers and subjective well being in new market economies. Journal of Development Studies, 38, 100–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haring-Hidore, M., Stock, W. A., Okun, M. A., & Witter, R. A. (1985). Marital status and subjective well-being: A research synthesis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 947–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope, S., Rodgers, B., & Power, C. (1999). Marital status transitions and psychological distress: Longitudinal evidence from a national population sample. Psychological Medicine, 29(2), 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jocklin, V., McGue, M., & Lykken, D. T. (1996). Personality and divorce: A genetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 288–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R., & Clark, A. (2006). Do people really adapt to marriage? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(4), 405–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 963–1002.

  • McBride, M. (2001). Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross section. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 45, 251–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. (1997). Crime and the American dream. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, W. L., DePaulo, B. M., Hertel, J., & Taylor, L. C. (2008). Singlism—Another problem that has no name: Prejudice, stereotypes, and discrimination against singles. In M. A. Morrison & T. G. Morrison (Eds.), The psychology of modern prejudice (pp. 165–194). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, W. L., Sinclair, S., & DePaulo, B. M. (2007). No shelter for singles: The perceived legitimacy of marital status discrimination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen, A. P. (1977). Sexism in the language of marriage. In A. P. Nilsen, H. Bosmajian, H. I. Gershuny, & J. P. Stanley (Eds.), Sexism and language (pp. 131–140). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the USA. Bonn: IZA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J., & Wetherell, M. (2003). The discursive climate of singleness: The consequences for women’s negotiation of a single identity. Feminism and Psychology, 13, 489–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uecker, J. E. (2014). Religion and early marriage in the United States: Evidence from the Add Health Study. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 53(2), 392–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau, Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division, Fertility & Family Statistics Branch. (2010). Families and living arrangements. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam.html.

  • Vaaler, M. L., Ellison, C. G., & Powers, D. A. (2009). Religious influences on the risk of marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(4), 917–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1899). Theory of the leisure Class: An economic study in the evolution of institutions. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1994). World database of happiness: Correlates of happiness. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, T. (2013). Sex and the Pursuit of Happiness: How Other People's Sex Lives are Related to our Sense of Well-Being. Social Indicators Research, 116, 115–135.

  • Wadsworth, T., & Pendergast, P. (2014). Obesity (sometimes) matters: The importance of context in the relationship between obesity and life satisfaction. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 55, 196–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L. J. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32, 483–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, J., & Jones, A. (2002). Is it absolute income or relative deprivation that leads to poor psychological well-being? A test based on individual-level longitudinal data. York: University of York, YSHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witter, R. A., Stock, W. A., Okun, M. A., & Haring, M. J. (1985). Religion and subjective well-being in adulthood: A quantitative synthesis. Review of Religious Research, 26(4), 332–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Wadsworth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wadsworth, T. Marriage and Subjective Well-Being: How and Why Context Matters. Soc Indic Res 126, 1025–1048 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0930-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0930-9

Keywords

Navigation