Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Household Trajectories in Rural Ethiopia: What Can a Mixed Method Approach Tell Us About the Impact of Poverty on Children?

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper explores the dynamics of child and household poverty in rural Ethiopia using three rounds of household survey and qualitative data collected by Young Lives, a longitudinal study of child poverty. It uses a mixed-method taxonomy of poverty to classify children and their households into four groups, analyse their movements in and out of poverty, and explore the underlying factors. The final section of the paper uses qualitative case studies to explore child welfare dynamics in more detail, looking at the interplay between the progress or decline of households and that of children within those households. It concludes that while the percentage of poor households within this sample reduced from 50 to 20 % between rounds 1 and 3 (2002–2009), these changes were not always beneficial to children and did not reach nearly 1 in 10 households classified as ultra-poor. A deepened understanding of those changes, employing both quantitative and qualitative methods, is deemed crucial in post-2015 millennium development goal discussions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The classifications refer to the current state of the household and do not acknowledge the amount of time they have spent in that state. For that reason we are not specifically looking at chronic poverty, although we identify households that have, for example, remained poor or ultra-poor over the preceding seven years.

  2. We had hoped to look at remoteness as a factor; however, the Young Lives sample has an acknowledged ‘tarmac bias’ whereby the majority of its sites are located near main roads. Additionally, many rural sites are spread-out so even within a non-remote site there may be households that are more than 10 km from the nearest market or heath centre.

  3. Due to shortage of space we cannot cover the measurement of poverty dynamics, but this is ably addressed in Dercon and Shapiro (2007) and Calvo and Dercon (2009).

  4. Bangladesh provides a good example of how poverty can be reduced overall while a core of poverty remains (Shepherd 2011, p6, fig. 2). This is demonstrated using three panel data sets collected by BIDS, IFPRI and Greeley from 1987 onwards.

  5. This is the second type of Q-squaring identified by Shaffer et al. (2008) which he dubs ‘methodological integration’.

  6. The qualitative research team visited the sites in 2009 for a sub-study on social protection, vulnerability and social mobility and took the opportunity to interview the case study children about changes in their lives since their last visit in 2008.

  7. These estimates are based on the cross-sectional samples of round 1, round 2 and round 3 rather than the panel data sample (the panel data sample is slightly smaller as not everyone who was surveyed in round 1 was available for resurvey in rounds 2 and 3). A sensitivity analysis of the taxonomy is available from the authors upon request.

  8. See Roelen and Camfield (2012) for a more detailed discussion.

  9. A child is considered to have moved upwards when doing better in round 3 in comparison to round 1 and a child is considered to have move downwards when being in a worse situation in round 3 in comparison to round 1.

  10. All names of children and sites are pseudonyms.

  11. £1 = ETB 28.06 (exchange rate 22/08/11).

  12. The Other Food Security Programme (OFSP) is designed to help households ‘graduate’ from PSNP by encouraging them in activities such as livestock breeding. Remaining within the programme is conditional on taking advantage of this, despite the risks for poorer households (Pankhurst 2009).

  13. Dibaba, Naomi and Degife had siblings working for a Dutch flower company in the neighbouring town, however, this was to cover their educational expenses rather than provide support to their parents.

  14. Wilkins Micawber is a fictional character from Charles Dickens’ 1850 novel David Copperfield. He is famous for setting one of the first poverty lines with his observation “Annual income 20 pounds, annual expenditure nineteen pounds 19 and six, result happiness. Annual income 20 pounds, annual expenditure 20 pounds ought and six, result misery.”.

References

  • Addison, T., Hulme, D., & Kanbur, R. (2009). Poverty dynamics. Interdisciplinary perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C. B., Marenya, P. P., Mcpeak, J., Minten, B., Murithi, F., Oluoch-Kosura, W., et al. (2006). Welfare dynamics in rural Kenya and Madagascar. Journal of Development Studies, 42(2), 248–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baulch, B. (Ed.). (2011). Why poverty persists: Poverty dynamics in Asia and Africa. Gloucester: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baulch, B., & Hoddinott, J. (2000). Economic mobility and poverty dynamics in developing countries. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baulch, B., & Masset, E. (2003). Do monetary and nonmonetary indicators tell the same story about chronic poverty? A study of Vietnam in the 1990s. World Development, 31(3), 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beja, E. L. (2012). Approach to the valuation of international development: Evidence for the millennium development goals. Social Indicators Research,. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9987-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, P. (2005). Studying multi-dimensional poverty in Ethiopia: Towards a Q-integrated approach. Q-squared Working Paper series, 15, Toronto.

  • Bevan, P. (2009). Working with cases in development contexts: Some insights from an outlier. In D. Byrne & C. Ragin (Eds.), Handbook of case-centred methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, P., & Pankhurst, A. (2007). Power structures, agency and community dynamics in rural Ethiopia. Paper prepared for the empowerment team in the World Bank.

  • Bigsten, A., Kebede, B., Shimeles, B., & Taddesse, M. (2003). Growth and poverty reduction in Ethiopia: Evidence from household panel surveys. World Development, 31(1), 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, K. (2007). The intergenerational transmission of poverty: An overview. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper Series, 99, University of Manchester.

  • Brooks-Gunn, J., & Duncan, G. (1997). The effects of poverty on children. The Future of Children, 7(2), 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1998). The extended case method. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 4–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, C., & Dercon, S. (2009). Chronic poverty and all that: The measurement of poverty over time. In T. Addison, D. Hulme, & R. Kanbur (Eds.), Poverty dynamics: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Washington, DC, USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. R., & Barrett, C. B. (2006). The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: An asset-based approach. Journal of Development Studies, 42(2), 178–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D., & Hulme, D. (2005). Towards an integrated framework for understanding the breadth, depth and duration of poverty. GPRG Working Paper series, 20, Universities of Manchester and Oxford, UK.

  • Davis, P. (2011). Passing on poverty: The intergenerational transmission of wellbeing and ill-being in rural Bangladesh. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper series, 192, University of Manchester, UK.

  • Davis, P., & Baulch, B. (2009). Parallel realities: Exploring poverty dynamics using mixed methods in rural Bangladesh. In Paper presented atEscaping poverty traps: Connecting the chronically poor to economic growthconference, Washington, DC, February 26–27, 2009.

  • De Weerdt, J. (2010). Moving out of poverty in Tanzania: Evidence from Kagera. Journal of Development Studies, 46(2), 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dercon, S. (2004). Growth and shocks: Evidence from rural Ethiopia. Journal of Development Economics, 74(2), 309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dercon, S. (2006). Economic reform, growth and the poor: Evidence from rural Ethiopia. Journal of Development Economics, 81, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dercon, S., & Krishnan, P. (2000). Vulnerability, seasonality and poverty in Ethiopia. Journal of Development Studies, 36(6), 25–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dercon, S., & Shapiro, J. S. (2007). Moving on, staying behind, getting lost: Lessons on poverty mobility from longitudinal data. Global Poverty Research Group, Working Paper series, 75, University of Manchester, UK.

  • Devereux, S., & Guenther, B. (2007). Social protection and agriculture in Ethiopia. Country case study paper prepared for a FAO review commissioned on ‘social protection and support to small farmer development’.

  • Devereux, S., & Sharp, K. (2006). Trends in poverty and destitution in Wollo, Ethiopia. Journal of Development Studies, 42(4), 592–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Toit, A. (2004). ‘Social exclusion’ discourse and chronic poverty: A South African case study. Development and Change, 35(5), 987–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirie, G., Negatu, W., & Getachew, D. (2009). Impacts of productive safety net programme on child poverty reduction: Implications for child education. Young Lives IDRC Paper, Addis Ababa.

  • Günther, I., & Klasen, S. (2009). Measuring chronic non-income poverty. In T. Addison, D. Hulme, & R. Kanbur (Eds.), Poverty dynamics: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Washington, DC, USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, M. (2009). The food price crisis and its impact on the productive safety net program in 2008. Humanitarian Exchange Magazine, 42, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoddinott, J. (2006). Shocks and their consequences across and within households in rural Zimbabwe. Journal of Development Studies, 42(2), 301–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoddinott, J., Gilligan, D. O., & Taffesse, A. S. (2009). The impact of Ethiopia’s productive safety net program on schooling and child labour. Journal of Development Studies, 45(10), 1684–1706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, D., & McKay, A. (2008). Identifying and measuring chronic poverty: Beyond monetary measures? In N. Kakwani & J. Silber (Eds.), The many dimensions of poverty. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanbur, R., & Sumner, A. (2011). Poor countries or poor people? Development assistance and the new geography of global poverty. CEPR Discussion Paper no. 8489. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. http://www.cepr.org/pubs/dps/DP8489.asp.

  • Krishna, A. (2009). Subjective assessments, participatory methods and poverty dynamics: The stages of progress method. In T. Addison, D. Hulme, & R. Kanbur (Eds.), Poverty dynamics: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Washington, DC, USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A. (2010). One illness away: Why people become poor and how they escape poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. (2005). Thinking about youth poverty through the lenses of chronic poverty, life-course poverty and intergenerational poverty. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper series, 57, University of Manchester, UK.

  • Moore, K., Grant, U., Hulme, D., & Shepherd, A. (2008). Very poor, for a long time, in many waysdefining “the poorest” for policy makers. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper series, 124, University of Manchester, UK.

  • Narayan, D. (2003). Moving out of poverty: Growth and freedom from the bottom-up. A global study proposal. PREM, World Bank.

  • Olsen, W. (2009). Non-nested and nested cases in a socio-economic village study. In D. Byrne & C. Ragin (Eds.), Handbook of case-centred methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outes-Leon, I., & Dercon, S. (2008). Survey attrition and attrition bias in Young Lives. Young Lives Technical Note 5.

  • Pankhurst, A. (2009). Rethinking safetynets and household vulnerability in Ethiopia: Implications of household cycles, types and shocks. In Paper presented at the world conference of humanitarian studies, Groningen 4–7 February 2009.

  • Roelen, K., & Camfield, L. (2012). A mixed-method taxonomy of child povertyThe case of Ethiopia. Young Lives working paper series #76.

  • Seeley, J. (2008). The intergenerational transmission of poverty during the AIDS epidemic in Uganda. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper series, 110, University of Manchester, UK.

  • Seeley, J., Kabunga, E., Tumwekwase, G., Wolff, B., & Grosskurth, H. (2008). The impact of the AIDS epidemic on the lives of older people in rural Uganda. DEV Working Paper series, 04, University of East Anglia, UK.

  • Sen, B. (2003). Drivers of escape and descent: Changing household fortunes in rural Bangladesh. World Development, 31(3), 513–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, P., Kanbur, R., Hang, N. T., & Aryeetey, E. (2008). Introduction to Q-squared in policy. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 2(2), 134–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, K. (2007). Squaring the “Q”s? Methodological reflections on a study of destitution in Ethiopia. World Development, 35(2), 264–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, A. (2007). Understanding and explaining chronic poverty. An evolving framework for phase III of CPRC’s research. Chronic Poverty Research Centre Working Paper series, 80, University of Manchester, UK.

  • Shepherd, A. (2011). Tackling chronic poverty. The policy implications of research on chronic poverty and poverty dynamics. Report, Chronic Poverty Research Centre, Manchester.

  • Taylor, S. (2008). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in researching the dynamics of childhood poverty. Enquire, 1(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldehanna, T. (2009). Productive safety net programme and children’s time use between work and schooling in Ethiopia. Young lives working paper 40.

  • Woldehanna, T., Alemu, T., & Mekonnen, A. (2008). Young lives: Ethiopia round 2 survey report. Oxford: Department for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1999). Ethiopia: Poverty and policies for the new millennium. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaqub, S. (2002). Poor children grow into poor adults: Harmful mechanisms or over-deterministic theory? Journal of International Development, 14, 1081–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2003). Case study research, design and method. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Camfield.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Camfield, L., Roelen, K. Household Trajectories in Rural Ethiopia: What Can a Mixed Method Approach Tell Us About the Impact of Poverty on Children?. Soc Indic Res 113, 729–749 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0298-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0298-7

Keywords

Navigation