Skip to main content
Log in

On the Measurement of Interpersonal Trust Transfer: Proposal of Indexes

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the measurement of trust transfer in interpersonal contexts. Despite the importance of this topic, little evidence of comparable indicators exists to fill the current gap in knowledge regarding the measurement of interpersonal transference of trust and its reciprocal. We propose a modification of the classical structure of a widely accepted experimental setting for analyzing trust (i.e. a trust game) and build two indexes for the measurement of trust transfer and its reciprocation. Several properties of these indicators are investigated to examine their robustness and accuracy for measuring the transference of interpersonal trust. Furthermore, using data from our own modified trust game, we provide an empirical examination of both indexes. The results show that the existence of a mutually known third party fosters a stronger willingness to achieve cooperative behavior in an anonymous trust game; thus, the transference of interpersonal trust works in both directions of the dyad.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This problem does not affect the validity of the index proposed. However, for the sake of simplicity in interpreting the results, we prefer to restrict the index within the interval \( \left[ {0,1} \right] \).

References

  • Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S. (2006). A note on the theory and measurement of trust in explaining differences in economic growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 371–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boero, R., Bravo, G., Castellani, M., & Squazzoni, F. (2009). Reputational cues in repeated trust games. Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 871–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi, C. (2008). Trust and reciprocity: Misunderstandings. International Review of Economics, 55, 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinesen, P. T. (2010). A note on the measurement of generalized trust of immigrants and natives. Social Indicators Research, 103(1), 169–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 601–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W., Ritzan, J., & Woolcock, M. (2006). Social cohesion, institutions, and growth. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle-Warnick, J., & Slonim, R. L. (2004). The evolution of strategies in a repeated trust game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 553–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 213–217). New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D. I., Scheinkman, J. A., & Soutter, C. L. (2000). Measuring trust. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 811–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (1995). Economic growth and social capital in Italy. Eastern Economic Journal, 21(3), 295–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, X., Wu, G., Wu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2010). The effects of Web assurance seals on consumers’ initial trust in an online vendor: A functional perspective. Decision Support Systems, 48, 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. B. (2002). Virtual field experiments for a digital economy: A new research methodology for exploring an information economy. Decision Support Systems, 32, 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C., Quartz, S. R., & Montague, P. R. (2005). Getting to know you: Reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science, 308, 78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S. (2003). Groups, growth and trust: Cross-country evidence on the Olson and Putnam hypotheses. Public Choice, 117, 341–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koufaris, M., & Hampton-Sosa, W. (2004). The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers. Information & Management, 41(3), 377–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, D., Loayza, N., & Menéndez, A. M. (2002). Violent crime: Does social capital matter? Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50, 509–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Park, D. H., & Han, I. (2011). The different effects of online consumer reviews on consumers’ purchase intentions depending on trust in online shopping malls: An advertising perspective. Internet Research, 21(2), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. C., Wang, I. W., & McKnight, D. H. (2007). Transfer from offline trust to key online perceptions: An empirical study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(4), 729–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., Yang, S., Chaung, P. Y. K., & Cao, Y. (2011). Dynamics between the trust transfer process and intention to use mobile payment services: A cross-environment perspective. Information & Management, 48(8), 393–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power: Two works by Niklas Luhmann. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, F., Möllering, G., & Saunders, M. N. K. (2012). Handbook of research methods on trust. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, D., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for ecommerce. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. (1990). The impact of trust on business, international security and the quality of life. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(8), 619–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliman, R. E., & Fugate, D. L. (1988). Using trust-transference as a persuasion technique: An empirical field investigation. The Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 8(2), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. A. (1996). Trust in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möllering, G. (2001). The nature of trust: From Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociology, 35(2), 403–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B. (1991). Game theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieminen, T., Martelin, T., Koskinen, S., Simpura, J., Alanen, E., Härkänen, T., et al. (2008). Measurement and socio-demographic variation of social capital in a large population-based survey. Social Indicators Research, 85(3), 405–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic tradition in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeskens, T., & Hooghe, M. (2008). Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of generalized trust. Evidence from the European Social Survey (2002 and 2004). Social Indicators Research, 85(3), 515–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Requena, F. (2003). Social capital, satisfaction and quality of life in the workplace. Social Indicators Research, 61(3), 331–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, B. G. (2012). Institutional quality and generalized trust: A nonrecursive causal model. Social Indicators Research, 107(2), 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotenberg, K., Fox, C., Green, S., Ruderman, L., Slater, K., Stevens, K., et al. (2005). Construction and validation of children’s interpersonal trust belief scale. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(2), 271–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serva, M. A., & Fuller, M. A. (2004). The effects of trustworthiness perceptions on the formation of initial trust: Implications for MIS student teams. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(4), 383–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serva, M. A., Fuller, M. A., & Mayer, R. C. (2005). The reciprocal nature of trust: A longitudinal study of interacting teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(6), 625–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1989). Philosophie des Geldes. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1990). The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K. J. (2003). Trust transfer on the World Wide Web. Organization Science, 14(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K. (2006). How hypertext links influence consumer perceptions to build and degrade trust online. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(1), 183–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris. http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf.

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2010). Mismeasuring our lives: Why GDP doesn’t add up?. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, S. J., & Tambyah, S. K. (2011). Generalized trust and trust in institutions in Confucian Asia. Social Indicators Research, 103(3), 357–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokuda, Y., & Inoguchi, T. (2008). Interpersonal mistrust and unhappiness among Japanese people. Social Indicators Research, 89(2), 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, M. C., Laczko, L., & Bjørnskov, C. (2011). Social diversity, institutions and trust: A cross-national analysis. Social Indicators Research, 101(3), 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T., & Kramer, R. (1996). Whither trust? In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 1–16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Horst, M., & Coffé, H. (2012). How friendship network characteristics influence subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 107(3), 509–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidotto, G., Vicentini, M., Argentero, P., & Bromiley, P. (2008). Assessment of organizational trust: Italian adaptation and factorial validity of the organizational trust inventory. Social Indicators Research, 88(3), 563–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1993). Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 34, 453–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, J. C., Arsal, R., Al-Marzouq, M., Moore, D., & Grover, V. (2010). Knowing your customers: Using a reciprocal relationship to enhance voluntary information disclosure. Decision Support Systems, 48, 395–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful for the valuable comments that were provided by two anonymous referees and for the financial support received from the Spanish Ministry of Education (project ECO2010-20483) and the Regional Government of Andalusia (project SEJ-3765).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Blanca L. Delgado-Márquez.

Appendix: The process of building the trust transfer reciprocation index

Appendix: The process of building the trust transfer reciprocation index

We establish the following notation:

  • \( y_{2}^{j} \): trust received by the β-type k(j)-trustee from the j-trustor

  • \( y_{12}^{j} \): trust placed by the j-trustor to the β-type k(j)-trustee

  • \( y_{21}^{j} \): trust returned by the β-type k(j)-trustee to the j-trustor

We specify that trust transfer reciprocity is maximized in a given period when a trustor and a β-type trustee trust one another in the same proportion of total trust that each has in that period.

Because the initial endowment of the trustor in our trust game is M j , the proportion of trust placed by the j-trustor in the β-type k(j)-trustee is \( \frac{{y_{12}^{j} }}{{M_{j} }} \).

Moreover, because the trust received by the β-type k(j)-trustee is \( y_{2}^{j} = my_{12}^{j} \), the proportion of trust returned to the j-trustor to the β-type k(j)-trustee is: \( \frac{{y_{21}^{j} }}{{my_{12}^{j} }} \).

According to our definition of trust transfer reciprocation, both proportions must be (at least) equal for trust transfer reciprocation to be maximized. Therefore, \( \frac{{y_{12}^{j} }}{{M_{j} }} = \frac{{y_{21}^{j} }}{{my_{12}^{j} }} \) if and only if \( \frac{{M_{j} y_{21}^{j} }}{{m\left( {y_{12}^{j} } \right)^{2} }} = 1 \).

Henceforth, we obtain the following expression:

$$ TTR_{21}^{j} = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\frac{{M_{j} y_{21}^{j} }}{{m\left( {y_{12}^{j} } \right)^{2} }}} & {y_{12}^{j} \ne 0} \\ 0 & {y_{12}^{j} = 0} \\ \end{array} } \right.. $$

Nonetheless, this index is not bounded within the interval \( \left[ {0,1} \right] \).Footnote 1 To solve this equation, we propose the following expression:

$$ TTR_{21}^{j} = \min \left\{ {\frac{{M_{j} y_{21}^{j} }}{{m\left( {y_{12}^{j} } \right)^{2} }},1} \right\}. $$

Furthermore, the above expression is an undefined problem if the denominator is zero. Because the multiplier must reflect a return on an investment and is, by definition, positive, the denominator of the above expression reaches zero if and only if the trust placed by the j-trustor in the β-type k(j)-trustee is zero (i.e. \( y_{12}^{j} = 0 \)). Hence, to avoid such a possibility, we make the following adjustment:

\( TTR_{21}^{j} = \min \left\{ {\frac{{M_{j} y_{21}^{j} }}{{\max \left\{ {m\left( {y_{12}^{j} } \right)^{2} ,1} \right\}}},1} \right\} \).

$$ \square $$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delgado-Márquez, B.L., Hurtado-Torres, N.E. & Aragón-Correa, J.A. On the Measurement of Interpersonal Trust Transfer: Proposal of Indexes. Soc Indic Res 113, 433–449 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0103-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0103-z

Keywords

Navigation