Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social Relations and School Life Satisfaction in South Korea

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study pays special attention to adolescents who are at the critical stage of social, cognitive and emotional development and their satisfaction with school life which is important for their educational experience and adult life. The purpose of this study is to examine how students’ relationships with friends, teachers and parents are associated with their school life satisfaction. We conducted hierarchical linear modeling with nationally representative data on 3,790 high school seniors in the consideration of different school types (general and vocational high schools) reflecting the contextual characteristics of South Korean education system. Our findings show that all those relations are associated with school life satisfaction and that some distinctive dimensions of each relation matter for students’ school life satisfaction. In particular, teacher-student relationship was found to shape students’ satisfaction with school life both at individual and school level. In spite of several limitations, the broad investigation of students’ social relations provided a policy implication for improving adolescents’ satisfaction with their school lives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale (MSLSS), students’ satisfaction with school life is measured by 8 items; (1) I look forward to going to school, (2) I like being in school, (3) School is interesting, (4) I wish I didn’t have to go to school, (5) There are many things about school I don’t like, (6) I enjoy school activities, (7) I learn a lot at school, and (8) I feel bad at school (Huebner 2001).

  2. Epstein and McPartland (1976) defined the quality of school life by three dimensions such as general satisfaction with school, commitment to school work, and attitudes toward teachers.

  3. Baker (1999) measured students’ appraisals of school satisfaction with three items, “I like being in school,” “School is interesting,” and “I wish I didn’t have to go to school (reversed).” Takakura et al. (2010) similarly assessed school satisfaction with three items, “I like school,” “School is a nice place to be,” and “Going to school is boring (reversed).”

  4. Special purpose high schools account for only a small proportion of total high schools in South Korea (5.26 % in 2011) [Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) 2011]. Since the KEEP had its purpose on investigating the overall characteristics of Korean education system, special purpose high schools were not sampled in the baseline year, 2004.

  5. You can find more detailed information on the KEEP at http://keep.nhrd.net/jsp/index.jsp.

  6. The surveys were administered in Korean but the English version of questionnaire is available on the website (http://eng.krivet.re.kr/eu/eg/prg_euFCALs.jsp). We also provided the actual survey questions included in our analysis in the “Appendix”.

  7. Since the items were based on five-point scale, the average score is classified as a low level of academic achievement.

  8. Though the scores of Cronbach’s alpha were low (for father 0.550 and mother 0.545), we combined those two items to represent the degree of parent’s support for their children.

  9. The variables included in our models are in italic letters, while those not included represent the reference categories.

  10. Although this is not the focus of our study, we will provide a conjecture by investigating the changes of Korean education policy in the discussion.

References

  • An, W. H. (2007). Effects of teacher-students’ relations social capital on student achievement. Asian Journal of Education, 8(3), 269–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. A. (1999). Teacher-student interaction in urban at-risk classrooms: Differential behavior, relationship quality, and student satisfaction with school. Elementary School Journal, 100(1), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. S., Grenard, J. L., Sussman, S., & Rohrbach, L. A. (2010). The influence of school-based natural mentoring relationships on school attachment and subsequent adolescent risk behaviors. Health Education Research, 25(5), 892–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesel, D. (2001). Student attitudes toward high school and educational expectations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.

  • Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Doyle, A. B., Markiewicz, D., & Bukowski, W. M. (2002). Same-sex peer relations and romantic relationships during early adolescence: Interactive links to emotional, behavioral, and academic adjustment. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly-Journal of Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 77–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (1986). Teacher influences on student-achievement. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1069–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbusch, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Thum, Y. M. (1989). The effects of high school organization on dropping out: An exploratory investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 353–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human-capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosnoe, R. (2002). High school curriculum track, and adolescent association with delinquent friends. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17(2), 143–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosnoe, R. (2004). Social capital and the interplay of families and schools. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66(2), 267–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosnoe, R., Cavanagh, S., & Elder, G. H. (2003). Adolescent friendships as academic resources: The intersection of friendship, race, and school disadvantage. Sociological Perspectives, 46(3), 331–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosnoe, R., & Elder, G. H. (2004). Family dynamics, supportive relationships, and educational resilience during adolescence. Journal of Family Issues, 25(5), 571–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M. K., & Elder, G. H. (2004). Intergenerational bonding in school: The behavioral and contextual correlates of student-teacher relationships. Sociology of Education, 77(1), 60–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(2), 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch, S. M., Erickson, K. G., Laird, J., & Wong, C. A. (2001). The relation of family and school attachment to adolescent deviance in diverse groups and communities. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16(4), 396–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L., & McPartland, J. M. (1976). The concept and measurement of quality of school life. American Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, S. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 1015–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, R. (2001). The relationship between life satisfaction, social interest, and frequency of extracurricular activities among adolescent students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30(6), 749–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Pugh, M. D. (1986). Friendships and delinquency. American Journal of Sociology, 91(5), 1170–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy—a study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinan, M. T. (2008). Teacher influences on students’ attachment to school. Sociology of Education, 81(3), 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, K. L., & Slater, M. D. (2007). The contextual effect of school attachment on young adolescents’ alcohol use. Journal of School Health, 77(2), 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, E. S. (1991). Correlates of life satisfaction in children. School Psychology Quarterly, 6(2), 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, E. S. (1994). Preliminary development and validation of a multidimensional life satisfaction scale for children. Psychological Assessment, 6, 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, E. S. (2001) Manual for the multidimensional students’ life satisfaction Scale. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Huebner, E. S., Ash, C., & Laughlin, J. E. (2001). Life experiences, locus of control, and school satisfaction in adolescence. Social Indicators Research, 55(2), 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G. S. (2006, September 16). [in Korean] Special screening for vocational school students will be enlarged up to 5 % of original quota? 3 % is still burden for colleges. Segye.

  • Jin, S. U., & Moon, S. M. (2006). A study of well-being and school satisfaction among academically talented students attending a science high school in Korea. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(2), 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Elder, G. H. (2001). Students’ attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74(4), 318–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. The American Journal of Sociology, 84(2), 427–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiuru, N., Nurmi, J., Aunola, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2009). Peer group homogeneity in adolescents’ school adjustment varies according to peer group type and gender. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(1), 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreager, D. A., & Haynie, D. L. (2011). Dangerous liaisons? Dating and drinking diffusion in adolescent peer networks. American Sociological Review, 76(5), 737–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubitschek, W. N., & Hallinan, M. T. (1998). Tracking and students’ friendships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuperminc, G. P., Darnell, A. J., & Alvarez-Jimenez, A. (2008). Parent involvement in the academic adjustment of Latino middle and high school youth: Teacher expectations and school belonging as mediators. Journal of Adolescence, 31(4), 469–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. W., Buhs, E. S., & Seid, M. (2000). Children’s initial sentiments about kindergarten: Is school liking an antecedent of early classroom participation and achievement? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly-Journal of Developmental Psychology, 46(2), 255–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGloin, J. M. (2009). Delinquency balance: Revisiting peer influence. Criminology, 47(2), 439–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeal, R. B. (1999). Parental involvement as social capital: Differential effectiveness on science achievement, truancy, and dropping out. Social Forces, 78(1), 117–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST). (2011). (in Korean) Brief statistics on Korean education.

  • Moody, J. (2001). Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in America. American Journal of Sociology, 107(3), 679–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68(1), 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1995). Children’s friendship relations—a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 306–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, E., & McCartney, K. (2007). Examining teacher-child relationships and achievement as part of an ecological model of development. American Educational Research Journal, 44(2), 340–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. Y. (2010). Crafting and dismantling the egalitarian social contract: The changing state-society relations in globalizing Korea. Pacific Review, 23(5), 579–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, J. (2010). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 175–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, B., Chiang, F. S., & Miller, R. J. (1997). Using research on employees’ performance to study the effects of teachers on students’ achievement. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 256–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu, J. Y. (2008). (in Korean) Panel review: Comparison between school environmental satisfaction of high school students. The HRD Review, 11(2), 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. L., & Stevenson, D. (1999). The ambitious generation: America’s teenagers, motivated but directionless. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. H., Haller, A. O., & Portes, A. (1969). Educational and early occupational attainment process. American Sociological Review, 34(1), 82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24(4), 323–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Son, J. J. (2010). [in Korean] A study on the horizontal stratification of high schools in South Korea. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(4), 139–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24, 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takakura, M., Wake, N., & Kobayashi, M. (2010). The contextual effect of school satisfaction on health-risk behaviors in Japanese high school students. Journal of School Health, 80(11), 544–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ueno, K. (2009). Same-race friendships and school attachment: Demonstrating the interaction between personal network and school composition. Sociological Forum, 24(3), 515–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maele, D., & Van Houtte, M. (2011). The quality of school life: Teacher-student trust relationships and the organizational school context. Social Indicators Research, 100, 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaquera, E., & Kao, G. (2008). Do you like me as much as I like you? Friendship reciprocity and its effects on school outcomes among adolescents. Social Science Research, 37(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyten, M., & Thijs, J. (2002). School satisfaction of elementary school children: The role of performance, peer relations, ethnicity and gender. Social Indicators Research, 59(2), 203–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, H. S., & Chen, J. K. (2010). School attachment among Taiwanese adolescents: The roles of individual characteristics, peer relationships, and teacher well-being. Social Indicators Research, 95(3), 421–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doo Hwan Kim.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4  

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, D.H., Kim, J.H. Social Relations and School Life Satisfaction in South Korea. Soc Indic Res 112, 105–127 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0042-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0042-8

Keywords

Navigation