Abstract
The report by the Stiglitz Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress highlighted the idea that sustainability in essence is about quality of life. This paper discusses and elaborates this notion. It argues that sustainable development should be seen as a process which does not focus on economic development alone, but which also includes well-balanced ecological and social development. Social aspects of sustainability deserve attention because of their instrumental and intrinsic relevance. A society needs a sense of community and commitment. The presence of social capital is very important for the liveability of a society. It is argued that the amount of social capital may fluctuate over time. This means that in the long term, future societies may be better in a social respect (more trust, more participation, less inequality) than today’s. Ensuring social sustainability is thus not only a matter of ensuring that present social cohesion is preserved, but also ensuring that this cohesion will increase or improve. The paper ends by addressing lines of research on social sustainability. The following research themes are mentioned: (1) Quality of life, social capital and social cohesion in a longitudinal perspective. (2) ‘Sustainability of what, why and for whom?’ Sustainability as an issue of choice: trade-offs. (3) Civil society and governance aspects of sustainability. (4) Public perceptions, values and opinions with regard to sustainability issues and (5) Fairness and inequality in relation to sustainability policy, both nationally and internationally.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bijl, R., & Boelhouwer, J. (2009). Participation, trust and inequality. In CBS, CPB, PBL, SCP (Ed.), Sustainability monitor for the Netherlands (Chapter 3). The Hague: CBS, CPB, PBL, SCP.
Bijl, R., Boelhouwer, J., Pommer, E., & Schyns, P. (Eds.). (2009). The social state of the Netherlands 2009. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Social Research/SCP.
Bourdieu, P. (1983). Forms of capital. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Press.
CBS, CPB, PBL, SCP. (2009). Sustainability monitor for the Netherlands. The Hague: CBS, CPB, PBL, SCP.
CPB. (2009). Brede welvaart en nationaal inkomen. The Hague: CPB.
de Boer, N., & Duyvendak, J. W. (1999). ‘De Permanente Roep om Sociaal Beleid met een Langere Adem’, Tijdschrift voor de Sociale Sector, no. 12, 1999,10–15.
European Commission. (2002). A European strategy for sustainable development. Luxembourg: European Commission.
European Commission (2009). GDP and beyond. Measuring in a changing world. Brussels, European Commission (COM(2009)433final, 20 August 2009).
Field, J. (2003). Social capital. London: Routledge.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
OECD. (2009). Measuring and fostering well-being and progress: The OECD Roadmap. Busan: OECD.
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). (Commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress). Report of the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris, 14 sept 2009. (www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr).
Telos (2006). De Duurzaamheidsbalans van Brabant, 2006. De Verantwoording, Telos, Brabants Centrum voor Duurzaamheidsvraagstukken, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Uslaner, E. M., & Brown, M. (2005). ‘Inequality, trust and civic engagement’. American Politics Research, 3(6), 868–894.
WCED. (1987). Our common future. WCED, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Developing a research agenda for the social aspects of sustainable development.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bijl, R. Never Waste a Good Crisis: Towards Social Sustainable Development. Soc Indic Res 102, 157–168 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9736-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9736-y