Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Family Economic Structure on Dual-Earners’ Career and Family Satisfaction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study builds on the explanatory power of the “doing gender” perspective to understand the effects of family economic structure on the family and career satisfaction of husbands and wives. Using data from a two-panel, couple-level survey of full-time employed middle-class families in the Northeastern United States, we find that when wives’ earnings increase relative to their husbands’, their career satisfaction significantly increases whereas their husbands’ is significantly depressed. In contrast, family economic structure has little effect on women’ and men’s level of family satisfaction, although we find a significant reduction in family satisfaction among couples who have recently shifted towards a more equal-earner economic structure. Our findings underscore the importance of considering both husbands’ and wives’ attitudes towards work and career in understanding how “gender is done” in couples, and in addressing the resulting family and work relations and dynamics. Focusing on the disjuncture between longstanding gender norms and current employment and earning patterns, we highlight the potential impact of these findings for couples, counselors, and organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bittman, M., England, P., Folbre, N., Sayer, L., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 186–214. doi:10.1086/378341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F. D., Ferber, M. A., & Winkler, A. E. (2006). The economics of women, men and work. Saddle Back, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R. D., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, R. T., Barnett, R. C., & Gareis, K. C. (2001). When she earns more than he does: A longitudinal study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 168–182. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00168.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. S., Grzywacz, J. G., & Michele Kacmar, K. (2010). The relationship of schedule flexibility and outcomes via the work-family interface. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(4), 330–355. doi:10.1108/02683941011035278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. J., Pilkauskas, N. V., McLanahan, S. S., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2011). Couples as partners and parents over children’s early years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(2), 317–334. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00809.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. J. (1979). Work life and marital dissolution. In G. Levinger & O. C. Moles (Eds.), Divorce and separation (pp. 151–166). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinamon, R. G., & Rich, Y. (2002). Gender differences in the importance of work and family roles: Implications for work-family conflict. Sex Roles, 47, 531–541. doi:10.1023/A:1022021804846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, L. P. (2006). ‘Doing’ gender in context: Household bargaining and risk of divorce in Germany and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 442–472. doi:10.1086/506417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., & Vanneman, R. (2004). Gender inequality at work. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. J. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender and Society, 21, 106–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188. doi:10.1177/0146167200262001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, F. (2009). Inventing equal opportunity. Princeton, NJ: University of Princeton Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • England, P. (2010). The gender revolution uneven and stalled. Gender and Society, 24, 149–166. doi:10.1177/0891243210361475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. (2010). Filling the glass: Gender perspectives on families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 420–439. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00711.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furdyna, H. E., Tucker, B. M., & James, A. D. (2008). Relative spousal earnings and marital happiness among African American and White women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 70, 332–344. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Social Survey. (1998). General social survey. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2002). The power of the pill: Oral contraception and women’s career and marriage decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 110, 730–770. doi:10.3386/w7527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 64–86. doi:10.2307/256352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, T. N. (2000). Economic dependence, gender and the division of labor in the home: A replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 322–335. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M., Tuma, N., & Groenveld, L. (1977). Income and marital events: Evidence from an income-maintenance experiment. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1186–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckert, D. A., Nowak, T. C., & Snyder, K. A. (1998). The impact of husbands’ and wives’ relative earnings on marital disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 690–703. doi:10.2307/353538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, S. D., & Duncan, G. J. (1995). The effect of income, wages and AFDC benefits on marital disruptions. Journal of Human Resources, 30, 19–41. doi:10.2307/146189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honeycutt, T. L., & Rosen, B. (1997). Family friendly human resource policies, salary levels, and salient identity as predictors of organizational attraction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 271–290. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.1554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. A., & Gerson, K. (1998). Who are the overworked Americans? Review of Social Economy, 56, 442–459. doi:10.1080/003446769800000044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. A., & Gerson, K. (2004). The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, M., & Kleinert, C. (2014). Marriage, gender, and class: The effects of partner resources on unemployment exit in Germany. Social Forces, 92(3), 839–871. doi:10.1093/sf/sot130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Cable, D., Boudreau, G., & Bretz, R. (1995). An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Personnel Psychology, 48, 485–516. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01767.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., Podsakoff, N. P., Shaw, J. C., & Rich, B. L. (2010). The relationship between pay and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 157–167. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanji, S., & Schober, P. (2014). Are couples with young children more likely to split up when the mother is the main or an equal earner? Sociology, 48, 38–58. doi:10.1177/0038038512467710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, G., & Taniguchi, H. (2006). Gender and marital happiness in later life. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 735–757. doi:10.1177/0192513X05285293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killewald, A. (2011). Opting out and buying out: Wives’ earnings and housework time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 459–471. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00818.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchmeyer, C. (1998). Determinants of managerial career success: Evidence and explanation of male/female differences. Journal of Management, 24, 673–692. doi:10.1177/014920639802400601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodahl, T. M., & Kejner, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1984). Motives, personality and society. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P., & Roehling, P. (2005). The career mystique: Cracks in the American dream. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58, 367–408. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nock, S. (2001). The marriages of equally dependent marriages. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 755–775. doi:10.1177/019251301022006005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, V. (1997). Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 431–453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Özcan, B., & Breen, R. (2012). Marital instability and female labor supply. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 463–481. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Langton, N. (1993). The effects of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 382–407. doi:10.2307/2393373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raley, S., Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2006). How dual are dual income couples? Documentary change from 1970 to 2001. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 11–28. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00230.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S. J. (2004). Dollars, dependency, and divorce: Four perspectives on the role of wives’ income. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 59–74. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00005.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H. L., & Sawhill, I. V. (1975). Time of transition. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, A. S., & Rossi, P. (1990). Of human bonding: Parent–child relations across the life course. In M. Useem & J. D. Wright (Eds.), Social institutions and social change (pp. 366–460). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, L. C., & Bianchi, S. M. (2000). Women’s economic independence and the probability of divorce: A review and reexamination. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 906–943. doi:10.1177/019251300021007005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, L. C., England, P., Allison, P., & Kangas, N. (2011). She left, he left: How employment and satisfaction affect men’s and women’s decisions to leave marriages. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 1982–2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1978). Career dynamics: Matching individual and organizational needs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. (2011). Market earnings and household work: New tests of gender performance theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 845–860. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00851.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. (2012). Gender deviance and household work: The role of occupation. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 1029–1072. doi:10.1086/662649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schober, P. S. (2012). Paternal child care and relationship quality: A longitudinal analysis of reciprocal associations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 281–296. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00955.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, E. R. (2011). Wives’ relative wages, husbands’ paid work hours and wives’ labor-force exit. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 250–263. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00802.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smilkstein, G. (1978). The family APGAR: A proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians. The Journal of Family Practice, 6, 1231–1239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • South, S., & Lloyd, K. (1995). Spousal alternatives and marital dissolution. American Sociological Review, 60, 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, K. W. (2010). Economic dependence in marriage and husbands’ midlife health: Testing three possible mechanisms. Gender and Society, 24(3), 378–401. doi:10.1177/0891243210371621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, J. (2010). Wives’ economic resources and risk of divorce. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 1305–1323. doi:10.1177/0192513X10370108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharenou, P. (2001). Going up? Do traits and informal social processes predict advancing in management? Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1005–1017. doi:10.2307/3069444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thebaud, S. (2010). Masculinity, bargaining and breadwinning: Understanding men’s housework in the cultural context of paid work. Gender and Society, 24, 330–354. doi:10.1177/0891243210369105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tichenor, V. (2005). Maintaining men’s dominance: Negotiating identity and power when she earns more. Sex Roles, 53, 191–205. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-5678-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treas, J., & Widmer, E. D. (2000). Married women’s employment over the life course: Attitudes in cross-national perspective. Social Forces, 78, 1409–1436. doi:10.1093/sf/78.4.1409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valcour, P. M., & Tolbert, S. P. (2003). Gender, family, and career in the era of boundarylessness: Determinants and effects of intra- and interorganizational mobility. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 768–787. doi:10.1080/0958519032000080794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisshaar, K. (2014). Earnings equality and relationship stability for same-sex and heterosexual couples. Social Forces, 93(1), 93–123. doi:10.1093/sf/sou065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2009). Accounting for doing gender. Gender and Society, 23, 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, A. E., McBride, T., & Andrews, C. (2005). Wives who outearn their husbands: A transitory or persistent phenomenon for couples? Demography, 42, 523–535. doi:10.1353/dem.2005.0028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winslow-Bowe, S. (2006). The persistence of wives’ income advantage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 824–842. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00298.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (Sloan FDN #96-6-9 and #99-6-3), and the National Institute on Aging (#2 P50 AG11711-06 and #P50 AG11711-01); Phyllis Moen, Principal Investigator.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronit Waismel-Manor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Waismel-Manor, R., Levanon, A. & Tolbert, P.S. The Impact of Family Economic Structure on Dual-Earners’ Career and Family Satisfaction. Sex Roles 75, 349–362 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0620-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0620-3

Keywords

Navigation