Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Competition, Coping, and Closeness in Young Heterosexual Adults’ Same-Gender Friendships

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated young adults’ experiences with competition in same-gender friendships. Participants were 494 heterosexual undergraduates (M = 19 years; 76% female) from a variety of self-identified ethnic backgrounds who were attending a California, U.S. public university. They completed an online survey about their relationship with their closest same-gender friend. Measures included evaluations of friendship quality as well as perceptions of friendship competition in four domains: peer relations (shared friendships), romance, academics, and sports. Also, individuals rated their level of distress and likely use of proactive (confronting, seeking social support) and passive (distancing) coping in relation to each domain of friendship competition. On average, men reported more friendship competition in all domains than did women. Women were more likely than men to report distress regarding competition in the peer and academic domains; also women were more likely than men to endorse proactive coping across all domains. Thus, average gender differences were found in responses to competition and coping in friendships. At the same time, SEM analyses revealed proactive coping mediated the associations between distress over competition and friendship closeness in parallel ways for women and men in each domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, J. M., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009). Cooperative courtship: Helping friends raise and raze relationship barriers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1285–1300. doi:10.1177/0146167209335640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benenson, J. F., & Benarroch, D. (1998). Gender differences in responses to friends’ hypothetical greater success. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 192–208. doi:10.1177/0272431698018002004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benenson, J. F., Markovits, H., Fitzgerald, C., Geoffroy, D., Flemming, J., Kahlenberg, S. M., & Wrangham, R. W. (2009). Males’ greater tolerance of same-sex peers. Psychological Science, 20, 184–190. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02269.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, C., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2013). Competition, envy, or snobbism? how popularity and friendships shape antipathy networks of adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 586–595. doi:10.1111/jora.12048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, T. J. (2004). Children’s friendships: Shifts over a half-century in perspectives on their development and their effects. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 206–223. doi:10.1353/mpq.2004.0014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birditt, K. S., & Fingerman, K. L. (2003). Age and gender differences in adults’ descriptions of emotional reactions to interpersonal problems. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58, 237–P245. doi:10.1093/geronb/58.4.P237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleske, A. L., & Shackelford, T. K. (2001). Poaching, promiscuity, and deceit: Combatting mating rivalry in same-sex friendships. Personal Relationships, 8, 407–424. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00048.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branco, A. U., Palmieri, M., & Pinto, R. G. (2012). Cultural practices and value constructions: The development of competition and individualism within societies. In A. U. Branco (Ed.), Cultural psychology of human values (pp. 31–62). Charlotte: IAP Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G., Abell, L., & Lyons, M. (2013). It’s not just a man-thing: Testing sex as a moderator between peer attachment and Machiavellianism, competition and self-disclosure. Individual Differences Research, 11, 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, W. M., Motzoi, C., & Meyer, F. (2009). Friendship as process, function, and outcome. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 217–231). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, W. M., Buhrmester, D., & Underwood, M. K. (2011). Peer relations as a developmental context. In M. K. Underwood & L. H. Rosen (Eds.), Social development: Relationships in infancy, childhood, and adolescence (pp. 153–179). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper, D. M., & Card, N. A. (2010). “We were best friends, but …”: Two studies of antipathetic relationships emerging from broken friendships. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25, 499–526. doi:10.1177/0743558410366596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S., & Chan, A. C. (1999). Sex, competitiveness, and intimacy in same-sex friendship in Hong Kong adolescents. Psychological Reports, 84, 45–48. doi:10.2466/pr0.1999.84.1.45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., & McIsaac, C. (2011). Romantic relationships in adolescence. In M. K. Underwood & L. H. Rosen (Eds.), Social development: Relationships in infancy, childhood, and adolescence (pp. 180–203). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Coontz, S. (2006). Romance and sex in adolescence and emerging adulthood. In A. C. Crouter & A. Booth (Eds.), Romance and sex in adolescence and emerging adulthood: Risks and opportunities (pp. 87–91). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R. K., Cooper, M. L., & Bouvrette, A. (2003). Contingencies of self-worth in college students: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 894–908. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.894.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). When people want what others have: The impulsive side of envious desire. Emotion, 12, 142–153. doi:10.1037/a0023523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, E., Sincharoen, S., & Leaper, C. (2005). The relation between sport orientations and athletic identity among adolescent girl and boy athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior, 28, 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., Aaldering, H., & Saygi, Ö. (2015). Conflict and negotiation within and between groups. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 2: Group processes (pp. 151–176). Washington: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14342-006.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, J., Tabares, A., Shapiro, A. F., & Gottman, J. M. (2012). Couple interaction in happy and unhappy marriages: Gottman laboratory studies. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes: Growing diversity and complexity (4th ed., pp. 57–77). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2002). The development of ability conceptions. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 57–88). San Diego: Academic Press.

  • Eckert, P. (1990). Cooperative competition in adolescent “girl talk.” Discourse Processes, 13, 91–122. doi:10.1080/01638539009544748.

  • Findlay, L. C., & Bowker, A. (2009). The link between competitive sport participation and self-concept in early adolescence: A consideration of gender and sport orientation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 29–40. doi:10.1007/s10964-007-9244-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children’s perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1016–1024. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.21.6.1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, S. M., Tor, A., & Schiff, T. M. (2013). The psychology of competition: A social comparison perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 634–650. doi:10.1177/1745691613504114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. L., & Deeter, T. E. (1988). Development of the Sport Orientation Questionnaire. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 59, 191–202. doi:10.1080/02701367.1988.10605504.

  • Goldsmith, D. J. (2004). Communicating social support. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (2011). Sex differences in friendship expectations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 723–747. doi:10.1177/0265407510386192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (2012). The construction of the self: Developmental and sociocultural foundations (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S. (2015). Gender and personality. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, M. L. Cooper, & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 515–534). Washington: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14343-023.

  • Henrich, C. C., Blatt, S. J., Kuperminc, G. P., Zohar, A., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2001). Levels of interpersonal concerns and social functioning in early adolescent boys and girls. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 48–67. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7601_3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbard, D. R., & Buhrmester, D. (2010). Competitiveness, gender, and adjustment among adolescents. Sex Roles, 63, 412–424. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9809-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., Cohn, S., Kanner, A. D., & Ryan, R. M. (2007). Some costs of American corporate capitalism: A psychological exploration of value and goal conflicts. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 1–22. doi:10.1080/10478400701386579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keener, E., Strough, J., & DiDonato, L. (2012). Gender differences and similarities in strategies for managing conflict with friends and romantic partners. Sex Roles, 67, 83–97. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0131-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, B. (1993). Conflict management among close peers. In B. Laursen (Ed.), Close friendships in adolescence (pp. 39–54). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaper, C. (1998). Decision-making processes between friends: Speaker and partner gender effects. Sex Roles, 39, 125–133. doi:10.1023/A:1018886018042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaper, C. (2014). Gender similarities and differences in language. In T. Holtgraves (Ed.), Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 62–81). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaper, C. (2015). Gender and social-cognitive development. In R. M. Lerner, L. S. Liben, & U. Muller (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, Vol. 2: Cognitive processes (7th ed., pp. 806–853). New York: Wiley.

  • Levant, R. F. (2011). Research in the psychology of men and masculinity using the gender role strain paradigm as a framework. American Psychologist, 66, 765–776. doi:10.1037/a0025034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Machin, A., & Dunbar, R. (2013). Sex and gender as factors in romantic partnerships and best friendships. Journal of Relationships Research, 4(e8), 1–10. doi:10.1017/jrr.2013.8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahalik, J. R., Morray, E. B., Coonerty-Femiano, A., Ludlow, L. H., Slattery, S. M., & Smiler, A. (2005). Development of the Conformity to Feminine Norms Inventory. Sex Roles, 52, 417–435. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3709-7.

  • Maner, J. K., & Ackerman, J. M. (2013). Love is a battlefield: Romantic attraction, intrasexual competition, and conflict between the sexes. In J. A. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 137–160). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • McGuire, J. E. (2013). Competition and emotional closeness in early adolescent friendships: The role of domain importance and coping (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I: Health & Medicine; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A & I: Social Sciences. (1347343119).

  • National Collegiate Athletic Association (2013). Student-athlete participation: 1981–1982 to 2012–2013. Indianapolis, IA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ncaapublications.com/productdownloads/PR2014.pdf

  • Peng, W., & Hsieh, G. (2012). The influence of competition, cooperation, and player relationship in a motor performance centered computer game. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2100–2106. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffaelli, M. (1997). Young adolescents’ conflicts with siblings and friends. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 539–558. doi:10.1023/A:1024529921987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, D. W., & Granito, V. (2010). Normative rules for trash talk among college athletes: an exploratory study. Journal of Sport Behavior, 33, 276–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robnett, R. D., & Leaper, C. (2013). Friendship groups, personal motivation, and gender in relation to high school students’ STEM career interest. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 652–664. doi:10.1111/jora.12013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential tradeoffs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, R. (2014). The gendered interplay between success and well-being during transitions. Educational Research, 56, 202–219. doi:10.1080/00131881.2014.898915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. H., Woodburn, S., Del Pilar Soteras Del Toro, M., & Udvari, S. J. (2005). Cultural and gender differences in the implications of competition for early adolescent friendship. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51, 163–191. doi:10.1353/mpq.2005.0013.

  • Schneider, B. H., Dixon, K., & Udvari, S. (2007). Closeness and competition in the inter-ethnic and co-ethnic friendships of early adolescents in Toronto and Montreal. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 27, 115–138. doi:10.1177/0272431606294822.

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel-Lifschitz, T. (2009). Cross-national variation in the size of sex differences in values: Effects of gender equality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 171–185. doi:10.1037/a0015546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, S., & Knafo, D. (1997). Balancing closeness and individuality in adolescent close relationships. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21, 687–702. doi:10.1080/016502597384622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, R. A., & Vacca, J. (2007). Interpersonal competition in friendships. Sex Roles, 57, 617–627. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9298-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: W W Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamres, L. K., Janicki, D., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002). Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 2–30. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesser, A. (1999). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In R. Baumeister (Ed.), The self in social psychology (pp. 446–460). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, T., & Perry, Z. (2005). Is the poor performance of self-worth protective students linked with social comparison goals? Educational Psychology, 25, 471–490. doi:10.1080/01443410500045558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt, T., & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 569–577. doi:10.1002/ab.20413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, C. D., Debruine, L. M., Feinberg, D. R., & Jones, B. C. (2013). A sex difference in the context-sensitivity of dominance perceptions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 366–372. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Women’s Sports Foundation (2009). Women’s sports and fitness facts and statistics. Retrieved from: http://www.womenssportsfoundation.org.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Jessica McGuire is now a Research Associate at Syracuse University. The research was supported by grants to Campbell Leaper from the Academic Senate of the University of California, Santa Cruz. We thank Rachael Robnett, Timea Farkas, and Antoinette Wilson for their comments and suggestions.

Author Contributions

Both authors collaborated in all aspects of the study. However, JM was more responsible for formulating the study’s research questions, devising the measures, and conducting the SEM statistical analyses; whereas CL was primarily responsible for writing the report and for conducting the other statistical analyses. Both authors approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Campbell Leaper.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Research involving human participants

The Institutional Review Board at the authors’ university reviewed and approved the research protocol.

Informed consent

Informed consent was secured from all participants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McGuire, J.E., Leaper, C. Competition, Coping, and Closeness in Young Heterosexual Adults’ Same-Gender Friendships. Sex Roles 74, 422–435 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0570-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0570-1

Keywords

Navigation