Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Men in Female-Dominated Vocations: a Rationale for Academic Study and Introduction to the Special Issue

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This introduction to the special issue on men in female-dominated vocations provides a rationale for examining this topic. To date, this topic has garnered relatively little research attention even though work is often identified as a central aspect of men’s identity. Although millions of men perform “women’s work” in a broad range of fields, the extant database around the world focuses primarily on male nurses and teachers and tends to focus on ways to recruit and retain men in these professions. We argue that studying men in female-dominated vocations is important because it furthers our understanding of the workplace in general, as well as the ways in which men experience, understand, and navigate challenges to their masculinity. Moreover, expanding our knowledge of men in female-dominated vocations has important theoretical implications for theories addressing gender-based equality and power dynamics, the psychology of men and masculinity, and intersecting identities (or intersectionality). After a brief overview of the literature and establishing this rationale, we introduce the articles in the special issue. The majority of the papers in this special issue are based on U.S. samples, with one exception from the U.K.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abreu, J. M., Goodyear, R. K., Campos, A., & Newcomb, M. D. (2000). Ethnic belonging and traditional masculinity ideology among African Americans, European Americans, and Latinos. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 1, 75–86. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.1.2.75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J. (1993). Male elementary teachers: Experiences and perspectives. In C. L. Williams (Ed.), Doing “women’s work”: Men in nontraditional occupations (pp. 113–127). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. (1998). Gender relations and identity at work: A case study of masculinities and femininities in an advertising agency. Human Relations, 51, 113–126. doi:10.1177/001872679805100801.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of Medical Colleges. (2014). Table 1: Medical students, selected years, 1965–2013. Retrieved from https://www.aamc.org/download/411782/data/2014_table1.pdf.

  • American Bar Association. (2014). Goal III report: An annual report on women’s advancement into leadership positions in the American Bar Association. Chicago, IL: American Bar Institution, Commission on Women in the Profession.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association (2010). APA commission on accreditation and APA office of program consultation and accreditation, research committee 2010 annual report online. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ed/accreditation/about/research/index.aspx.

  • American Psychological Association (2013). Member profiles, 2013. Washington DC: American psychological association, center for workforce studies. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/workforce/publications/13-member/profiles.pdf.

  • American Psychological Association Task Force on Women in Academe. (2000). Women in academe: Two steps forward, one step back. Washington DC: American Psychological Assocaition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, C. L. (2012). Going against the flow: A longitudinal study of the effects of cognitive skills and gender beliefs on occupational aspirations and outcomes. Sociological Forum, 27, 986–1009. doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2012.01365.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (2007, August). Is there anything good about men? Invited address at the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.

  • Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, H. (1989). Men’s work. Women’s work. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, G., & Levant, R. F. (1999). A history of division 51 (The society for the psychological study of men and masculinity). In D. Dewsbury (Ed.), Unification through division: Histories of the divisions of the American Psychological Association (pp. 197–220). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. M., Tappan, M. B., Gilligan, C., Miller, B. A., & Angyris, D. E. (1994). Reading for self and moral voice: A method for interpreting narratives of real-life moral conflict and choice. In B. Puka (Ed.), Caring voices and women’s moral frames: Gilligan’s view (pp. 161–189). NY: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005). Table 11. Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.pdf.

  • Chusmir, L. (1990). Men who make non-traditional career choices. Journal of Counseling & Development, 69, 11–16. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1990.tb01446.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clow, K. A., Ricciardelli, R., & Bartfay, W. J. (2014). Are you man enough to be a nurse? The impact of ambivalent sexism and role congruity on perceptions of men and women in nursing advertisements. Sex Roles, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0418-0.

  • Cochran, S. V. (2010). Emergence and development of the psychology of men and masculinity. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 43–58). NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cognard-Black, A. J. (2004). Will they stay, or will they go? Sex-typical work among token men who teach. Sociological Quarterly, 45, 113–139. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2004.tb02400.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Suen, Y.-t. (2012). Taking stock: Exploring trends in the field of men’s studies through a content analysis of the American Men’s Studies Association (AMSA) Annual Conference Programs (1993–2011). The Journal of Men’s Studies, 20, 73–83. doi:10.3149/jms.2001.73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collison, D., & Hearn, J. (1994). Naming men as men: Implications for work, organization and management. Gender, Work and Organization, 1, 2–20. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.1994.tb00002.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2000). The men and the boys. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottingham, M. D., Erickson, R. J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2014). Examining men’s status shield and status bonus: How gender frames the emotional labor and job satisfaction of nurses. Sex Roles, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0419-z.

  • David, D., & Brannon, R. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture’s blueprint for manhood and what it’s done for us lately. In D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1–48). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F. M., & Saxon, S. E. (1998). Traditional ideologies, nontraditional lives. Sex Roles, 38, 331–362. doi:10.1023/A:1018749620033.

  • Dodson, T. A., & Borders, L. D. (2006). Men in traditional and nontraditional careers: Gender role attitudes, gender role conflict, and job satisfaction. Career Development Quarterly, 54, 283–296. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2006.tb00194.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, M. G., Rochlen, A. B., & O’Brien, K. M. (2013). Employee, mother, and partner: An exploratory investigation of working women with stay-at-home fathers. Journal of Career Development, 40, 3–22. doi:10.1177/0894845311401744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi, S. (1999). Stiffed: The betrayal of the American man. New York, NY: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, L. Y., Navarro, R. L., Smith, J. L., & Ploszaj, A. M. (2006). Testing a model of nontraditional career choice goals with Mexican American adolescent men. Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 214–234. doi:10.1177/1069072705283763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores, L., Navarro, R. L., & Dewitz, J. (2008). Mexican American high schools’ post-secondary educational goals: Applying social cognitive career theory. Journal of Career Assessment, 6, 489–501. doi:10.1177/1069072708318905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, T., & Newman, E. (2005). Just a knock back? Identity bruising on the route to becoming a male primary school teacher. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, II, 341–345. doi:10.1080/13450600500137091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouad, N. A. (2007). Work and vocational psychology: Theory, research, and applications. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 543–564. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085713.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 545–579. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.28.6.545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription, compromise, and self creation. In D. Brown & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (pp. 85–148). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Gottfredson, L. S., & Lapan, R. (1997). Assessing gender based circumscription of occupational aspirations. Journal of Career Assessment, 5, 419–441. doi:10.1177/106907279700500404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, W. P., & Mattis, J. S. (2005). Being a man about it: Manhood meaning among African American men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6, 114–126. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.6.2.114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardie, J. H. (2015). Women’s work? Predictors of young men’s aspirations for entering traditionally female-dominated occupations. Sex Roles, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0449-1.

  • Hausmann, R., Tyson, L. D., Bekhouche, Y., & Zahidi, S. (2014). The global gender gap report 2014. Cologny/Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heasley, R. (2013). Twenty years and counting: The relevance of men’s studies in a gendered world. Journal of Men’s Studies, 21, 9–13. doi:10.3149/jms.2101.9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson, K. D., & Rogers, J. K. (2001). “Why Marcia, you’ve changed!” Male clerical temporary workers doing masculinity in a feminized occupation. Gender and Society, 15, 218–238. doi:10.1177/089124301015002004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Hultin, M. (2003). Some take the glass escalator, some hit the glass ceiling? Career consequences of occupational sex segregation. Work and Occupations, 30, 30–61. doi:10.1177/0730888402239326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isacco, A., & Morse, J. Q. (2015). Male graduate students at a “women’s college”: Examining the roles of academic motivation, support, connection, and masculinity ideology. Sex Roles, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0447-3.

  • Jackson, Z. V., Wright, S. L., & Perrone-McGovern, K. M. (2010). Work-family interface for men in nontraditional careers. Journal of Employment Counseling, 47, 157–166. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1920.2010.tb00100.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jome, L. M., & Tokar, D. M. (1998). Dimensions of masculinity and major choice traditionality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, 120–134. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.1571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantamneni, N. (2013). Gender and the psychology of working. In D. Blustein (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the psychology of working (pp. 85–102). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilmartin, C. (2010). The masculine self (4th ed.). Corwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. (1996). Manhood in America: A cultural history. NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko, I., Kotrba, L., & Roebuck, A. (2015). Leaders as males?: The role of industry gender composition. Sex Roles, this issue.

  • Koenig, A. M., & Eagly, A. H. (2005). Stereotype threat in men on a test of social sensitivity. Sex Roles, 52, 489–496. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3714-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lease, S. H. (2003). Testing a model of men’s nontraditional occupational choices. The Career Development Quarterly, 51, 244–258. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2003.tb00605.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. F. (1992). Toward the reconstruction of masculinity. Journal of Family Psychology, 5, 379–402. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.5.3-4.379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. F. (1996). The new psychology of men. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 259–265. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.27.3.259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. F., Smalley, K. B., Aupont, M., House, A. T., Richmond, K., & Noronha, D. (2007). Initial validation of the Male Role Norms Inventory-Revised. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 15, 83–100. doi:10.3149/jms.1501.83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, D. J., Darrow, C. N., Klein, E. B., Levinson, M. H., & McKee, B. (1978). The seasons of a man’s life. NY: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W. M. (2002). The social class-related experiences of men: Integrating theory and practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 355–360. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.33.4.355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhaorg, H., & Zivian, M. T. (1995). Gender role conflict: The interaction of gender, gender role, and occupation. Sex Roles, 33, 607–619. doi:10.1007/BF01547720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, B. (2000). Maintaining masculinity: Men who do women’s work. British Journal of Management, 11, S33–S48. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.11.s1.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, B. (2006). Explaining men’s entry in female-concentrated occupations: Issues of masculinity and social class. Gender, Work & Organization, 13, 103–128. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00299.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Theodore, H., Cournoyer, R. J., & Lloyd, B. F. (2001). A cross-national and cross-sectional comparison of men’s gender role conflict and its relationship to social intimacy and self-esteem. Sex Roles, 45, 1–14. doi:10.1023/A:1013008800019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Ludlow, L. H., Diemer, M. A., Scott, R. P. J., Gottfried, M., & Freitas, G. (2003). Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Journal of Men and Masculinity, 4, 3–25. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahalik, J. R., Perry, J. C., Coonerty-Femiano, A., Catraio, C., & Land, L. N. (2006). Examining conformity to masculinity norms as a function of RIASEC vocational interests. Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 203–213. doi:10.1177/1069072705283761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, R. E., Hays, D. G., & Runyan, H. I. (2015). Faculty member attitudes and behaviors toward male counselors in training: A social cognitive career theory perspective. Sex Roles, this issue.

  • Mitchell, J. (2012). Women notch progress: Females now constitute one-third of nation’s ranks of doctors and lawyers. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887323717004578159433220839020?mod=e2tw.

  • Monaghan, L. F. (2002). Embodying gender, work, and organization: Solidarity, cool loyalties and contested hierarchy in a masculinist occupation. Gender, Work & Organization, 9, 504–536. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (1992). Discovering men. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojeda, L., Rosales, R., & Good, G. E. (2008). Socioeconomic status and cultural predictors of male role attitudes among Mexican American men: Son mas macho? Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 9, 133–138. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.9.3.133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, J. M., Helms, B. J., Gable, R. K., David, L., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1986). Gender-role conflict scale: College men’s fear of femininity. Sex Roles, 14, 335–350. doi:10.1007/BF00287583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pompper, D. (2010). Masculinities, the metrosexual, and media images: Across dimensions of age and ethnicity. Sex Roles, 63, 682–696. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9870-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochlen, A. B., Suizzo, M.-A., McKelley, R. A., & Scaringi, V. (2008). “I’m just providing for my family”: A qualitative study of stay-at-home fathers. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 9, 193–206. doi:10.1037/a0012510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochlen, A. B., Good, G. E., & Carver, T. A. (2009). Predictors of gender related barriers, work, and life satisfaction among men in nursing. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 10, 44–56. doi:10.1037/a0013291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, P. (2001). Real men or real teachers? Contradictions in the lives of elementary school teachers. Harriman, TN: Men’s Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, L. J., & Bryant, A. N. (2006). The impact of college on sex-atypical career choices of men and women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 52–63. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sbaratta, C. A., & Tirpak, D. M. (2015). Male-male advising relationships in graduate psychology: A diminishing dyad. Sex Roles, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0466-0.

  • Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2002). The differential effects of solo status on members of high and low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 694–707. doi:10.1177/0146167202288013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevier, B., & Ashcraft, C. (2009). Be careful what you ask for: Exploring the confusion around and usefulness of the male teacher as male role model discourse. Men and Masculinities, 11, 533–557. doi:10.1177/1097184X07302290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J., & Neuberg. (2007). From stereotype threat to stereotype threats: Implications of a multi-threat framework for causes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 107–130. doi:10.1177/1088868306294790.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shen-Miller, D. S., Olson, D., & Boling, T. (2011). Masculinity in nontraditional occupations: Ecological constructions. American Journal of Men’s Studies, 5, 18–29. doi:10.1177/1557988309358443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. (2004). Masculinity at work: The experiences of men in female dominated occupations. Work, Employment and Society, 18, 349–368. doi:10.1177/09500172004042773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. (2005). Men in non-traditional occupations: Career entry, career orientation and experience of role strain. Gender, Work & Organization, 12, 363–380. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00278.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R. (2009). Men in caring occupations: Doing gender differently. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smiler, A. P. (2004). Thirty years after gender: Concepts and measures of masculinity. Sex Roles, 50, 15–26. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000011069.02279.4c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smiler, A. P. (2006). Conforming to masculine norms: Evidence for validity among adult men and women. Sex Roles, 54, 767–775. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9045-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobiraj, S., Rigotti, T., Weseler, D., & Mohr, G. (2015). Masculinity ideology and psychological strain: Considering men’s social stressors in female-dominated occupations. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 16, 54–66. doi:10.1037/a0035706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soerlie, V., Talseth, A., & Norberg, A. (1997). Male nurses: Reasons for entering and experiences of being in the profession. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science, 11, 113–118. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.1997.tb00441.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, J. L., & Gore, P. A. (2000). Advances in vocational psychology theory and research. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (3rd ed., pp. 233–269). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomaskovic-Devey, D., Zimmer, C., Stainback, K., Robinson, C., Taylor, T., & McTague, T. (2006). Documenting desegregation: Segregation in American workplaces by race, ethnicity, and sex, 1966–2003. American Sociological Review, 71, 565–588. doi:10.1177/000312240607100403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Gender and occupational choice. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology, vol 2: Gender research in social and applied psychology (pp. 379–400). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wester, S. R., Pionke, D. R., & Vogel, D. L. (2005). Male gender role conflict, gay men, and same-sex romantic relationships. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6, 195–208. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.6.3.195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wester, S. R., Vogel, D. L., Wei, M., & McLain, R. (2006). African American men, gender role conflict, and psychological stress: The role of racial identity. Journal of Counseling and Development, 84, 419–429. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2006.tb00426.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittock, M., & Leonard, L. (2003). Stepping outside the stereotype. A pilot study of the motivations and experiences of males in the nursing profession. Journal of Nursing Management, 11, 242–249. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2834.2003.00379.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Social Problems, 39, 253–267. doi:10.2307/3096961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (Ed.). (1993). Doing women’s work: Men in non-traditional occupations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. L. (2013). The glass escalator, revisited: Gender inequality in neoliberal times. Gender & Society, 27, 609–629. doi:10.1177/0891243213490232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, H. J., Mohr, G., & Bochert, J. (2009). Gender role self-concept, gender role conflict, and well-being in male primary school teachers. Sex Roles, 60, 114–127. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9493-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Y. J., Steinfeldt, J. A., Speight, Q. L., & Hickman, S. J. (2010). Content analysis of psychology of men & masculinity (2000–2008). Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 11, 170–181. doi:10.1037/a0019133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhams, C., Lupton, B., & Cowling, M. (2014). The presence of ethnic minority and disabled men in feminized work: Intersectionality, vertical segregation and the glass escalator. Sex Roles, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0427-z.

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Shen-Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen-Miller, D., Smiler, A.P. Men in Female-Dominated Vocations: a Rationale for Academic Study and Introduction to the Special Issue. Sex Roles 72, 269–276 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0471-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0471-3

Keywords

Navigation