Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Gender-Role Differences in Spatial Ability: A Meta-Analytic Review

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although gender-related differences in highly gender typed cognitive abilities are of considerable interest to educators and cognitive researchers alike, relatively little progress has been made in understanding the psychological processes that lead to them. Nash (1979) proposed a gender-role mediation hypothesis for such differences, with particular emphasis on spatial ability. However, changes in gender equality and gender stereotypes in the decades since merit a re-examination of whether a gender-role association still holds (Feingold 1988). A meta-analysis of 12 studies that examined gender-role identity and mental rotation performance was conducted. These included studies from the United Kingdom, Canada, Poland, Croatia, and the United States of America. The mean effect size for masculinity was r = .30 for men and r = .23 for women; no association was found between femininity and mental rotation. This effect size was slightly larger than that found previously by Signorella and Jamison (1986), and exceeds many other factors known to influence spatial ability. The implications of gender-role mediation of gender differences are discussed and future research directions are identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alpert-Gillis, L. J., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Gender and sex role influences on children’s self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57, 97–114. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00762.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuthnot, J. (1975). Sex, sex-role identity, and cognitive style. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 41, 435–440. doi:10.2466/pms.1975.41.2.435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Auster, C. J., & Ohm, S. C. (2000). Masculinity and femininity in contemporary American society: A reevaluation using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 43, 499–528. doi:10.1023/A:1007119516728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. S. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327–344. doi:10.1007/BF00287729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. (2010). Women in science: The persistence of gender in Australia. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22, 1–19. doi:10.1787/hemp-v22-art3-en.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162. doi:10.1037/h0036215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643. doi:10.1037/h0077098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternate procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 196–205. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.45.2.196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender Schema Theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (Ed.). (1984). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. (1976). Sex typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 48–54. doi:10.1037/h0078640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benbow, C. P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 169–232. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00049670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, M. E., Boyle, G. J., & Jackling, B. F. (1990). Sex-role identity and mental ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 213–217. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(90)90234-I.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., & Rothstein, H. R. (1999). Comprehensive meta-analysis: A computer program for research synthesis. Englewood: BioStat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J., Neumann, D. L., Furedy, J. J., & Westbury, H. R. (2010a). Combining the methods of differential and experimental psychology to study sex differences in human cognitive psychological functions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110, 392–410. doi:10.2466/pms.110.2.396-410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J., Neumann, D. L., Furedy, J. J., & Westbury, H. R. (2010b). Sex differences in verbal and visual-spatial tasks under different hemispheric visual-field presentation conditions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110, 396–410. doi:10.2466/pms.110.2.396-410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, M. J. (1998). The implications for academic attainment of perceived gender-appropriateness upon spatial task performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 203–215. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01284.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, P. J., & Caplan, J. B. (1994). Thinking critically about research on sex and gender. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrol, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R., Pezaris, E., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). The influence of spatial ability on gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology, 31, 697–705. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.4.697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (1997). Mediators of gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores: A comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties. Developmental Psychology, 33, 669–680. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.4.669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009). Women’s underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 218–261. doi:10.1037/a0014412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, J. M., & Serbin, L. A. (1977). Behaviorally based masculine-and feminine-activity-preference scales for preschoolers: Correlates with other classroom behaviors and cognitive tests. Child Development, 48, 1411–1416. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1977.tb03947.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389–409. doi:10.1037/h0035334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H. M. (1981). On the significance of effects and the effects of significance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1013–1018. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L. A., & Shepard, R. N. (1973). Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 75–176). Oxford: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., Chaffin, R., & Fitton, L. (1995). Cognition in social context. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 341–362. doi:10.1016/1041-6080(95)90006-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, A. R., & Prieto, G. (2004). Cognitive mediators and sex-related differences in mathematics. Intelligence, 32, 25–32. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(03)00061-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, R. A., Voyer, D., & Cherney, I. D. (2012). The relation between childhood spatial activities and spatial abilities in adulthood. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33, 112–120. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2012.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, C. A. (1973). Sex differences in reading: An evaluation and a critique of current theories. Review of Educational Research, 43, 455–467. doi:10.2307/1170076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, C. A. (1974). Influence of children’s sex role standards on reading and arithmetic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 811–816. doi:10.1037/h0021522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Mitchell, A. A. (2004). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: Implications for the sociopolitical attitudes of men and women. In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Praeger guide to the psychology of gender (pp. 183–206). Westport: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–172. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00781.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2007). Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 199–210). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Harold, R. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents’ socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 183–201. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb01929.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847. doi:10.2307/1131221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 103–127. doi:10.1037/a0018053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emmott, S. (1985). Sex differences in children’s play: Implications for cognition. International Journal of Women’s Studies, 8, 449–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evardone, M., & Alexander, G. (2009). Anxiety, sex-linked behaviors, and digit ratios (2D:4D). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 442–455. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9260-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J., Wilson, G. D., & Jackson, C. (1996). Eysenck Personality Profiler. Surrey: PSI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95–103. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.43.2.95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. A. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 51–71. doi:10.3102/00028312014001051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. P. (2001). Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed-and random-effects methods. Psychological Methods, 6, 161–180. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.6.2.161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • French, J. W., Ekstrom, R. B., & Price, L. A. (1963). Manual for kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Princeston: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, I. H., & Chrisler, J. C. (2011). Editorial policy on the use of the terms “Sex” and “Gender”. Sex Roles, 64, 789–790. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9988-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, A. M., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2005). Gender differences in mathematics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilger, J. W., & Ho, H.-Z. (1989). Gender differences in adult spatial information processing: Their relationship to pubertal timing, adolescent activities, and sex-typing of personality. Cognitive Development, 4, 197–214. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(89)90015-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Culture, gender, and math. Science, 320, 1164–1165. doi:10.1126/science.1154094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (2007). Science, sex, and good sense: Why women are underrepresented in some areas of science and math. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.), Why aren’t more women in science?: Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 121–130). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (2011). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., & Lamay, M. (2000). The smarter sex: A critical review of sex differences in intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 229–246. doi:10.1023/A:1009027516424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., & Tan, U. (2001). Stereotypes and steroids: Using a psychobiosocial model to understand cognitive sex differences. Brain and Cognition, 45, 392–414. doi:10.1006/brcg.2001.1287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1–51. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., Beninger, A. S., & Straight, C. A. (2011). Sex differences in intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 253–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., Straight, C. A., & Stephenson, C. L. (2011). Beliefs about cognitive gender differences: Accurate for direction, underestimated for size. Sex Roles, 64, 336–347. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9891-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. J. (1995). Beyond sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: The impact of gender trait possession. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 1–20. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1995.tb02542.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V., & Becker, B. J. (1986). Statistical methods in the meta-analysis of research on gender differences. In J. S. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 14–50). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41–45. doi:10.1126/science.7604277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. W. (1972). Early childhood experiences and women’s achievement motives. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 129–155. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1972.tb00022.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hromatko, I., Tadinac, M., & Vranic, A. (2008). Femininity and masculinity across the menstrual cycle: A relation to mate value. Collegium Antropologicum, 32, 81–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (1990). Meta-analysis and the psychology of gender differences. Signs, 16, 55–73. doi:10.1086/494645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (1996). Where are the gender differences? Where are the gender similarities? In D. M. Buss & N. M. Malmouth (Eds.), Sex, power and conflict (pp. 107–118). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2006). Gender similarities still rule. American Psychologist, 61, 641–642. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.641b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2007a). New directions in the study of gender similarities and differences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 259–263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00516.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2007b). Women in science: Gender similarities in abilities and sociocultural forces. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.), Why aren’t more women in science?: Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 131–145). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., & Lindberg, S. M. (2007). Facts and assumptions about the nature of gender differences and the implications for gender equity. In S. S. Klein (Ed.), Handbook for achieving gender equity through education (2nd ed., pp. 19–32). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagieka, A., & Herman-Jeglińska, A. (1998). The effect of masculinity and sex hormones on a mental rotation task in right-and left-handed males. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 30, 111–112. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(98)90282-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, W., & Signorella, M. L. (1980). Sex-typing and spatial ability: The association between masculinity and success on Piaget’s water-level task. Sex Roles, 6, 345–353. doi:10.1007/BF00287356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, W., & Signorella, M. L. (1987). Relations of masculinity and femininity in self-concept to spatial performance in adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 148, 249–251. doi:10.1080/00221325.1987.9914554.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (1964a). Acquisition and significance of sex-typing and sex-role identity. In M. L. Hoffman & L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 1, pp. 137–168). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (1964b). The child’s sex role classification of school objects. Child Development, 35, 1051–1056. doi:10.2307/1126852.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalichman, S. C. (1989). Sex roles and sex differences in adult spatial performance. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 150, 93–100. doi:10.1080/00221325.1989.9914579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, G., & Kelley, K. (2012). Statistical models for meta-analysis: A brief tutorial. World Journal of Methodology, 2, 27–32. doi:10.5662/wjm.v2.i4.27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. (2000). Sex and cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knafo, A., Iervolino, A. C., & Plomin, R. (2005). Masculine girls and feminine boys: Genetic and environmental contributions to atypical gender development in early childhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 400–412. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1966). A cognitive-developmental analysis of children’s sex-role concepts and attitudes. In E. E. Maccoby & R. G. D’Andrade (Eds.), The development of sex differences (pp. 82–172). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., & Ullian, D. (1974). Stages in the development of psycho-sexual concepts and attitudes. In R. C. Friedman, R. M. Richart, & R. Vande Wiele (Eds.), Sex differences in behavior (pp. 209–222). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, K., Goh, J., & Driver-Linn, E. (2012). Implicit science stereotypes mediate the relationship between gender and academic participation. Sex Roles, 66, 220–234. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0036-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, S. (1989). Sex role orientation and domains of self-esteem. Sex Roles, 21, 415–422. doi:10.1007/BF00289600.

  • Lever, J. (1976). Sex differences in the games children play. Social Problems, 23, 478–487. doi:10.1525/sp.1976.23.4.03a00100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. C., Vasilyeva, M., Lourenco, S. F., Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2005). Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skill. Psychological Science, 16, 841–845. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01623.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S., & Clarke, M. (2001). Forest plots: Trying to see the wood and the trees. BMJ, 322, 1479–1480. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7300.1479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q. (1999). Teachers’ beliefs and gender differences in mathematics: A review. Educational Research, 41, 63–76. doi:10.1080/0013188990410106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S., Bigler, R. S., & Krogh, H. R. (2002). Language at work: Children’s gendered interpretations of occupational titles. Child Development, 73, 810–828. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1123–1135. doi:10.1037/a0021276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498. doi:10.2307/1130467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lytton, H., & Romney, D. M. (1991). Parents’ differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 267–296. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1990). The role of gender identity and gender constancy in sex-differentiated development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1990, 5–20. doi:10.1002/cd.23219904703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. (2004). Children’s search for gender cues: Cognitive perspectives on gender development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 67–70. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00276.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathewson, J. H. (1999). Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Education, 83, 33–54. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<33::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J. (2007). Hidden sexism: Facial prominence and its connections to gender and occupational status in popular print media. Sex Roles, 57, 515–525. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9276-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCartney, K., & Rosenthal, R. (2000). Effect size, practical importance, and social policy for children. Child Development, 71, 173–180. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milton, G. A. (1957). The effects of sex-role identification upon problem-solving skill. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 208–212. doi:10.1037/h0044103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, S. C. (1975). The relationship among sex-role stereotyping, sex-role preference, and the sex difference in spatial visualization. Sex Roles, 1, 15–32. doi:10.1007/BF00287210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, S. C. (1979). Sex role as mediator of intellectual functioning. In M. A. Wittig & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Sex-related differences in cognitive functioning: Developmental issues (pp. 263–302). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2011). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2011. Arlington: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/pdf/wmpd2011.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. C., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., et al. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77–101. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, D. L., Fitzgerald, Z. T., Furedy, J. J., & Boyle, G. J. (2007). Sexually dimorphic effects of acute nicotine administration on arousal and visual-spatial ability in non-smoking human volunteers. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 86, 758–765. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2007.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, D. L., Sturm, A. C., Boyle, G. J., & Furedy, J. J. (2010). Effects of nicotine administration via a sublingual tablet on arousal and verbal ability in non-smokers. Australian Journal of Psychology, 62, 75–81. doi:10.1080/00049530902795458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, N. S. (2007). Taking science seriously: Straight thinking about spatial sex differences. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.), Why aren’t more women in science?: top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 69–77). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, N. S., & Dubas, J. S. (1992). A longitudinal study of predictors of spatial ability in adolescent females. Child Development, 63, 37–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb03593.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, N. S., & Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: Why, what, and how. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4, 102–111. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2010.01089.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math= male, me= female, therefore math≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44–59. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., et al. (2009). National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10593–10597. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809921106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, R. L., Casey, M. B., & Pezaris, E. (2005). Spatial ability as a mediator of gender differences on mathematics tests: A biological-environmental framework. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 121–142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwin, R. G. (1983). A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8, 157–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, D. L. (2008). Gender stereotypes and women’s reports of liking and ability in traditionally masculine and feminine occupations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 196–203. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00424.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Miller, D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193–203. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., Lehmann, W., Takahira, S., Takeuchi, Y., & Jordan, K. (2006). Mental rotation test performance in four cross-cultural samples (N= 3367): Overall sex differences and the role of academic program in performance. Cortex, 42, 1005–1014. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70206-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1968). Six psychological studies. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popiel, E. M., & De Lisi, R. (1984). An examination of spatial ability in relation to factors from the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priess, H. A., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). Gender and academic abilities and preferences. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 297–316). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, Q., Wilson, G. D., & Abrahams, S. (2004). Biosocial factors, sexual orientation and neurocognitive functioning. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 867–881. doi:10.1016/S0306-4530(03)00154-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, D. (2012). Gender, culture and sex-typed cognitive abilities. PLoS One, 7, e39904. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, D. (2004). Gender role orientation and performance on stereotypically feminine and masculine cognitive tasks. Sex Roles, 50, 583–591. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000023077.91248.f7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robison-Awana, P., Kehle, T. J., & Jenson, W. R. (1986). But what about smart girls? Adolescent self-esteem and sex role perceptions as a function of academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 179–183. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.78.3.179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1995). Writing meta-analytic reviews. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 183–192. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59–82. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166–169. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.74.2.166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, L., London, B., Levy, S., & Lobel, M. (2011). The roles of perceived identity compatibility and social support for women in a single-sex STEM program at a co-educational university. Sex Roles, 65, 725–736. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9945-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2006). Gender development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development, pp. 858–932). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, D. M., McCreary, D. R., & Saxberg, J. K. J. (2002). Does gender role socialization mediate sex differences in mental rotations? Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1101–1111. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00106-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarbrough, P. S., & Johnston, V. S. (2005). Individual differences in women’s facial preferences as a function of digit ratio and mental rotation ability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 509–526. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmader, T. (2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194–201. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serbin, L. A., & Connor, J. M. (1979). Sex-typing of children’s play preferences and patterns of cognitive performance. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 134, 315–316. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(79)90050-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serbin, L. A., Zelkowitz, P., Doyle, A. B., Gold, D., & Wheaton, B. (1990). The socialization of sex-differentiated skills and academic performance: A mediational model. Sex Roles, 23, 613–628. doi:10.1007/BF00289251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604–614. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.93.3.604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703. doi:10.1126/science.171.3972.701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J. A. (1967). Problem of sex differences in space perception and aspects of intellectual functioning. Psychological Review, 74, 290–299. doi:10.1037/h0024723.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. (1978). Sex differences in the correlations among field dependence, spatial ability, sex role orientation, and performance on Piaget’s water-level task. Developmental Psychology, 14, 689–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. (1986). Masculinity, femininity, androgyny, and cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 207–228. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.2.207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Signorella, M. L., Jamison, W., & Krupa, M. H. (1989). Predicting spatial performance from gender stereotyping in activity preferences and in self-concept. Developmental Psychology, 25, 89–95. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.1.89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, I., Choi, J., & Peters, M. (2007). The Hunter-Gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: Data from 40 countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 261–268. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9168-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1984). Gender identity and its implications for masculinity and femininity. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motiuation: Psychology and Gender (pp. 59–95). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624–635. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes: What do they signify? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44–62. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb01021.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39. doi:10.1037/h0076857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffens, M., & Jelenec, P. (2011). Separating implicit gender stereotypes regarding math and language: Implicit ability stereotypes are self-serving for boys and men, but not for girls and women. Sex Roles, 64, 324–335. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9924-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A. H., & Bailey, M. M. (1973). The socialization of achievement orientation in females. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 345–366. doi:10.1037/h0035261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanowicz, A., & Furnham, A. (2011). Gender differences in self-estimates of general, mathematical, spatial and verbal intelligence: Four meta analyses. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 493–504. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. C., & Hall, J. A. (1982). Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347–366. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, T. G. (1958). SRA Primary Mental Abilities (test). Chicago: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titze, C., Jansen, P., & Heil, M. (2010). Mental rotation performance in fourth graders: No effects of gender beliefs (yet?). Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 459–463. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, D. M. (1987). Toy-playing habits, spatial ability, science and mathematics achievement: Are they related? Sex Roles, 17, 115–138. doi:10.1007/BF00287620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, G. E., & Pillard, R. C. (1991). Sexual orientation and cognitive abilities. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20, 307–318. doi:10.1007/BF01541849.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599–604. doi:10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vonnahme, P. (2005). Facial preferences of Caucasian males as a function of 2D:4D digit ratio and mental rotation ability (Unpublished dissertation). New Mexico State University, Las Crues, New Mexico.

  • Voyer, D., & Bryden, M. (1990). Mental rotation: A study of gender differences and sex role identity. Canadian Psychology, 31, 253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.2.250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835. doi:10.1037/a0016127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. (1983). Sex role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 765–778. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. (1988). Masculinity, femininity, and self-esteem: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. Sex Roles, 18, 419–431. doi:10.1007/bf00288393.

  • Wilkinson, L. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594–604. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2007). Introduction: Striving for perspective in the debate on women and science. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.), Why aren’t more women in science?: Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 3–23). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by a Griffith University Postgraduate Research Scholarship. Thanks go to Dr Heather Green, Dr Michael Steele, Dr Elizabeth Conlon, and Dr Margaret Signorella for early revisions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, 4222, Australia

    David Reilly & David L. Neumann

  2. Behavioural Basis of Health Program, Griffith Health Institute, Queensland, Australia

    David L. Neumann

Authors
  1. David Reilly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David L. Neumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Reilly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reilly, D., Neumann, D.L. Gender-Role Differences in Spatial Ability: A Meta-Analytic Review. Sex Roles 68, 521–535 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0269-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0269-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation