Date: 29 Dec 2011
Pornography, Individual Differences in Risk and Men’s Acceptance of Violence Against Women in a Representative Sample
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Based on the Confluence Model of Sexual Aggression, we hypothesized that individual differences in risk for sexual aggression moderate the association between pornography use and attitudes supporting violence against women. This hypothesis was in keeping with the findings of a recent meta-analysis which indicated such a positive association between porn use and attitudes. However, in this meta-analysis there was also a high degree of heterogeneity among studies, suggesting the existence of crucial moderating variables. Unfortunately, the available literature included in this meta-analysis did not enable identifying the basis for such moderation. To fully test our hypothesis of individual differences moderation and related hypotheses requires a representative sample. Fortunately, a unique nationally representative sample of U.S. men in any form of post-high school education that we obtained in 1984–85 enabled testing our predictions. Participants had anonymously completed questionnaires that included items pertaining to pornography use, attitudes about violence against women, and other measures assessing risk factors highlighted by the Confluence Model. As predicted, while we found an overall positive association between pornography consumption and attitudes, further examination showed that it was moderated by individual differences. More specifically, as predicted this association was found to be largely due to men at relatively high risk for sexually aggression who were relatively frequent pornography consumers. The findings help resolve inconsistencies in the literature and are in line not only with experimental research on attitudes but also with both experimental and non-experimental studies assessing the relationship between pornography consumption and sexually aggressive behavior.
Allen, M., Alessio, D., & Brezgel, K. (1995a). A meta-analysis summarizing the effects of pornography II: Aggression after exposure. Human Communication Research, 22, 256–283. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00368.x
Altman, D. G. (1998). Categorizing continuous variables. In P. Armitage & T. Colton (Eds.), Encyclopedia of biostatistics (pp. 563–567). West Sussex: Wiley.
Altman, D. G. (2005). Categorizing continuous variables. In P. Armitage & T. Colton (Eds.), Encyclopedia of biostatistics (2nd ed., pp. 1–5). West Sussex: Wiley. doi:10.1002/0470011815.b2a10012.
Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power-> sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768–781. doi:10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.528.PubMedCrossRef
Boeringer, S. (1994). Pornography and sexual aggression: Associations of violent and nonviolent depictions with rape and rape proclivity. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 289–304. doi:10.1080/01639625.1994.9967974.
Boislard, P. M., Poulin, F., Kiesner, J., & Dishion, T. (2009). A longitudinal examination of risky sexual behaviors among Canadian and Italian adolescents: Considering individual, parental, and friend characteristics. Journal of Behavioral Development., 33, 265–276. doi:10.1177/0165025408098036.CrossRef
Bridges, A., Wosnitzer, R., Scharrer, E., Sun, C., & Liberman, R. (2010). Aggression and sexual behavior in best-selling pornography videos: A content analysis update. Violence Against Women, 16, 1065–1085.
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York: Ballantine.
Check, J. V. (1985). The hostility toward women scale. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45(12B, Pt. 1), 3993.
Check, J. V. P., & Guloien, T. H. (1989). Reported proclivity for coercive sex following repeated exposure to sexually violent pornography, non-violent dehumanising pornography, and erotica. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Pornography: Research advances and policy considerations (pp. 159–184). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Coopersmith, J. C. (2008). Do-it-yourself pornography—The democratization of pornography. In J. Gernzfurthner, G. Friesinger, & D. Fabry (Eds.), prOnnovation? Pornography and technological innovation (pp. 48–55). San Francisco: Re/Search.
Dietz, P. E., & Sears, A. E. (1988). Pornography and obscenity sold in ‘adult bookstores’: A survey of 5132 books, magazines, and films in four American cities. Journal of Law Reform, 21, 7–46.
Ellis, L. (1988). Theories of rape. New York: Spectrum.
Geen, R. (2001). Human aggression (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Open University.
Hald, G. M. (2007). Pornography consumption—A study of prevalence rates, consumption patterns, and effects. Århus: Fællestrykkeriet for Sundhedsvidenskab, Aarhus Universitet.
Hald, G. M., & Malamuth, N. M, (in preparation). Experimental effects of exposure to pornography: The moderating effect of personality in a random sample of Danish men.
Kingston, D. A., Federoff, P., Firestone, P., Curry, S., & Bradford, J. M. (2008). Pornography use and sexual aggression: The impact of frequency and type of pornography use on recidivism among sexual offenders. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 341–351. doi:10.1002/ab.20250
Malamuth, N. M. (2003). Criminal and non-criminal sexual aggressors: Integrating psychopathy in a hierarchical-mediational confluence model. In R. A. Prentky, E. Janus, & M. Seto (Eds.), Understanding and managing sexually coercive behavior. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (pp. 33–58). New York: New York Academcy of Sciences. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07292.x.
Malamuth, N. M., Addison, T., & Koss, M. (2000). Pornography and sexual aggression: Are there reliable effects and can we understand them? Annual Review of Sex Research, 11, 26–91.PubMed
McKenzie-Mohr, D., & Zanna, M. (1990). Treating women as sexual objects: Look at the (Gender Schematic) male who viewed pornography. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 296–308. McKenzie-Mohr0146-16721622961990 doi:10.1177/0146167290162010.
Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Consequences of adolescent drug use: Impact on the lives of young adults. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). The negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682. doi:10.1037//0022-35184.108.40.2063.PubMedCrossRef
Turner, E. L., Dobson, J. E., & Pocock, S. J. (2010). Categorisation of continuous risk factors in epidemiological publications: A survey of current practice. Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, 7. doi:10.1186/1742-5573-7-9.
U.S. Bureau of Statistics. (1990). Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Bureau of Statistics. (2009). Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Wright, P. J., Malamuth, N. M., & Donnerstein, E. (2011). Research on sex in the media: What do we know about effects on children and adolescents. In D. Singer & J. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (2nd ed.) (pp. 273–302). Newbury Park: Sage.
Zillmann, D. (1989). The effects of prolonged consumption of pornography. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Pornography: Research advances and policy considerations (pp. 127–158). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Pornography, Individual Differences in Risk and Men’s Acceptance of Violence Against Women in a Representative Sample
Volume 66, Issue 7-8 , pp 427-439
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Attitudes supporting violence
- Confluence Model
- Rape myths
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Departments of Communication and Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- 4. Department of Communication, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1538, USA
- 2. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- 3. University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ, USA