Beyond “Empowerment”? Sexuality in a Sexist World
- Nicola Gavey
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The subject of girls’ sexual empowerment is a fertile area for feminist debate. While most feminists are committed to the promotion of diverse and egalitarian sexual possibilities for girls (and women), we differ in our views on how to hold an aspirational vision alongside paying attention to real world constraints on its unfolding. A specific instance of this tension is posed in considering how relevant claims to individual empowerment are within a broader context that remains broadly sexist and limiting as well as saturated with racist and other forms of discrimination and inequality. In this paper, I join the dialogue opened by Lamb and Peterson (2011) to explore some of these questions. I argue that the concept of sexual empowerment, as taken up in these debates, might be too flexible to do the work we require of it. In particular, I suggest that it is unhelpful to fix our lens on claims of individual empowerment, if and where this involves eliding the broader sociocultural conditions of possibility for “intimate justice” (McClelland 2010) for girls and women; and, where it leads us to over-ride the psychosocial complexity of all individuals in ways that distract us from attending to ambivalence and understanding the “cruel attachments” that can bind us to injustice. Rather than seeking to offer an “‘expert’ view of empowerment,” I argue for the value of reflexive, empathic, and respectful feminist critique of the cultural conditions of possibility for such a thing.
- Berlant, L. (2006). Cruel optimism. Differences: A journal of feminist cultural studies, 17, 20–36. doi:10.1215/10407391-2006-009. CrossRef
- Bordo, S. (1997). Twilight zones: The hidden life of cultural images from Plato to O.J. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Cahill, A. J. (2009). Sexual violence and objectification. In R. J. Heberle & V. Grace (Eds.), Theorizing sexual violence (pp. 14–30). New York: Routledge.
- Collins, P. H. (2005). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York and London: Routledge.
- Coy, M. (2009). Milkshakes, lady lumps and growing up to want boobies: How the sexualisation of popular culture limits girls’ horizons. Child Abuse Review, 18, 372–383. doi:10.1002/car.1094. CrossRef
- Donaghue, N., Kurz, T., & Whitehead, K. (in press). Spinning the pole—a discursive analysis of the websites of recreational pole-dancing studios. Feminism & Psychology.
- Evans, A., Riley, S., & Shankar, A. (2010). Technologies of sexiness: Theorizing women’s engagement in the sexualization of culture. Feminism & Psychology, 20, 114–131. doi:10.1177/0959353509351854. CrossRef
- Fahs, B., & Delgado, D. A. (2011). The specter of excess: Race, class, and gender in women’s body hair narratives. In C. Bobel & S. Kwan (Eds.), Embodied resistance: Challenging norms, breaking the rules (pp. 13–25). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
- Fine, M., & McClelland, S. I. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 297–338.
- Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. New York and London: Routledge.
- Gavey, N. (2005). Just sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape. New York and London: Routledge.
- Gavey, N., Antevska, A., Pollard, W., Tanzer, A., Govender, M., Woods, K., et al. (2010a). Dancing in cages: Gender, sexuality and identity in relation to youth “raunch” culture. Unpublished interview data.
- Gavey, N., Antevska, A., Govender, M., Pollard, W., Ravlich, A., Tanzer, A., et al. (2010b, November 17–19). Dancing in cages in postfeminist bliss? Reflections on gender, identity, and sexuality at an Auckland “after-ball”. Paper presented at Contemporary Ethnography Across the Disciplines, Hui 2010, Hamilton, New Zealand.
- Gill, R. C. (2007). Critical respect: The difficulties and dilemmas of agency and ‘choice’ for feminism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 14, 69–80. doi:10.1177/1350506807072318. CrossRef
- Gill, R. (2008a). Culture and subjectivity in neoliberal and postfeminist times. Subjectivity, 25, 432–445. doi:10.1057/sub.2008.28. CrossRef
- Gill, R. (2008b). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism & Psychology, 18, 35–60. doi:10.1177/0959353507084950. CrossRef
- Gill, R. (2009). Supersexualize me! Advertising and “the midriffs”. In F. Attwood, R. Brunt, & R. Cere (Eds.), Mainstreaming sex: The sexualization of culture (pp. 93–109). I.B. Taurus.
- Jagose, A. (2010). Counterfeit pleasures: Fake orgasm and queer agency. Textual Practice, 24, 517–539. doi:10.1080/09502361003690849. CrossRef
- Kalish, R., & Kimmel, M. (2011). Hooking up: Hot hetero sex or the new numb normative? Australian Feminist Studies, 26, 137–151. doi:10.1080/08164649.2011.546333. CrossRef
- Lamb, S. (2010a). Feminist ideals for a healthy female adolescent sexuality: A critique. Sex Roles, 62, 294–306. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9698-1. CrossRef
- Lamb, S. (2010b). Porn as a pathway to empowerment? A response to Peterson’s commentary. Sex Roles, 62, 314–317. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9756-8. CrossRef
- Lamb, S., & Peterson, Z. (2011). Adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment: Two feminists explore the concept. Sex Roles. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9995-3. this issue.
- Levy, A. (2005). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. New York: Free Press.
- McClelland, S. I. (2010). Intimate justice: A critical analysis of sexual satisfaction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 663–680. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00293.x. CrossRef
- McRobbie, A. (2008). Pornographic permutations. The Communication Review, 11, 225–236. doi:10.1080/10714420802306676. CrossRef
- Peterson, Z. (2010). What is sexual empowerment? A multidimensional and process-oriented approach to adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment. Sex Roles, 62, 307–313. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9725-2.
- Smith, J. (2009, August 22). Parents hire cage dancers for school afterball. New Zealand Herald. Retrieved from http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10592447.
- Stuart, A. & Donaghue, N. (in press). Choosing to conform—The discursive complexities of choice in relation to feminine beauty practices. Feminism & Psychology, in press.
- Tolman, D. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Walter, N. (2010). Living dolls: The return of sexism. London: Virago.
- Whitehead, K., & Kurz, T. (2009). “Empowerment” and the pole: A discursive investigation of the reinvention of pole dancing as a recreational activity. Feminism & Psychology, 19, 224–244. doi:10.1177/0959353509102218. CrossRef
- Beyond “Empowerment”? Sexuality in a Sexist World
Volume 66, Issue 11-12 , pp 718-724
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Sexual empowerment
- Cultural critique
- Industry Sectors
- Nicola Gavey (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Psychology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand