Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Masculinity and the Distortion of Self-Reported Height in Men

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we examined whether aspects of the masculine gender role predict the distortion of self-reported height in men. The sample of men (N = 220) were from a mid-sized university in Ontario, Canada and ranged in age from 17.92 through 29.25 years. The men reported their height and completed scales measuring masculine, gender-related characteristics (Agency, Unmitigated Agency, gender-typed Occupational Preferences and Conformity to Male Norms). An experimenter also measured the men’s height using a standardized scale. As expected, the men over-reported their height. Shorter men exaggerated their height more than taller men. Also, as expected, a linear regression analysis revealed that certain masculine, gender-related characteristics (Unmitigated Agency and Occupational Preferences) predicted an over-reporting of height. These results suggest that men higher in some stereotypically masculine gender role characteristics have an elevated need to achieve socially desirable masculine physical characteristics, and do so to such a degree that they are prone to distorting this important aspect of their body size. Implications of these results (e.g., the reliability of self-report height) are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, M. G., & Fisher, T. D. (2003). Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 27–35. doi:10.1080/00224490309552164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. M., & Zucker, K. J. (1995). Childhood sex-typed behavior and sexual orientation. Developmental Psychology, 31, 43–55. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.1.43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron, D., & Tylka, T. L. (2007). Support for the uniqueness of body dissatisfaction from drive for muscularity among men. Body Image, 4, 288–295. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2007.05.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1974). Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 157–215). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blashill, A. J., & van der Wal, J. S. (2009). Mediation of gender role conflict and eating pathology in gay men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 10, 204–217. doi:10.1037/a0016000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert, A. F. (2010). Physical development and sexual orientation in men and women: An examination of NATSAL-2000. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 110–116. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9398-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert, A. F., & Blanchard, R. (1996). Physical development and sexual orientation in men: Height, weight, and age of puberty differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 77–84. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(96)00045-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannon, R., & Juni, S. (1984). A scale for measuring attitudes toward masculinity. Psychological Documents, 14, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, C., Oskamp, S., & Sparks, W. (1978). Courtship American style: Newspaper advertisements. Family Coordinator, 26, 27–30. doi:10.2307/581857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danoff-Burg, S., Mosher, C. E., & Grant, C. A. (2006). Relations of agentic and communal personality traits to health behavior and substance use among college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 353–363. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, C. A. (2006). Individual difference factors and men’s attraction to female body features (Unpublished master's thesis). Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.

  • Feldman, S. D. (1975). The presentation of shortness in everyday life—height and heightism in American society: Toward a sociology of stature. In S. D. Feldman & G. W. Thielbar (Eds.), Life styles: Diversity in American society (pp. 427–442). Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaed, S. G., & Gallo, L. C. (2006). Distinctions among agency, communion, and unmitigated agency and communion according to the interpersonal circumplex, five-factor model, and social-emotional correlates. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 77–88. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8601_09.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1998). A theory of unmitigated communion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 173–183. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (2000). The implications of unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion for domains of problem behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 1031–1057. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S., & Lepore, S. J. (2004). Quality of life following prostate cancer: The role of agency and unmitigated agency. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2559–2585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herpin, N. (2005). Love, careers, and heights in France, 2001. Economics and Human Biology, 3, 420–449. doi:10.1016/j.ehb.2005.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. D., Lamont, J., Monacelli, J., & Vojick, A. (2004). Sex-role orientation associations with college students’ body-image preferences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 99, 995–998. doi:10.2466/PMS.99.7.995-998.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lever, J., Frederick, D. A., & Peplau, L. A. (2006). Does size matter? Men and women’s view on penis size across the lifespan. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 7, 129–143. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.7.3.129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (1995). Gender-related individual differences and psychological adjustment in terms of the Big Five and circumplex models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1184–1202. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the people-things dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 996–1009. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2002). Gender-related traits of heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 83–98. doi:10.1023/A:1014035302843.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2005a). Subdomains of gender-related occupational interests: Do they form a cohesive bipolar M-F dimension? Journal of Personality, 73, 693–730. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00326.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2005b). Gender, nature, and nurture (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2006). The gender reality hypothesis. The American Psychologist, 61, 639–640. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.639.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2008a). Sex differences and sexual orientation differences in personality: Findings from the BBC internet survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 173–187. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9267-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (2008b). The relation between childhood gender nonconformity and adult masculinity-femininity and anxiety in heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Sex Roles, 59, 684–693. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9476-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B., Ludlow, L., Diemer, M., Scott, R., Gottfried, M., et al. (2003). Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 3–25. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. T., & Nguyen, D. H. (2004). Anthropometric analysis of homosexuals and heterosexuals: Implications for early hormone exposure. Hormones and Behavior, 45, 31–39. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2003.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, Y., Tiggemann, M., & Churchett, L. (2008). The shape of things to come: Gay men’s satisfaction with specific body parts. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 9, 248–256. doi:10.1037/a0012473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCreary, D. R., Saucier, D. M., & Courtenay, W. H. (2005). The drive for muscularity and masculinity: Testing the associations among gender role traits, behaviors, attitudes, and conflict. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6, 83–94. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.6.2.83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D. (2002). Height and reproductive success in a cohort of British men. Human Nature, 13, 473–491. doi:10.1007/s12110-002-1004-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto-Garcia, F. J., Bush, T. L., & Keyl, P. M. (1990). Body mass definitions of obesity: Sensitivity and specificity using self-reported weight and height. Epidemiology, 1, 146–152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palta, M., Prineas, R. J., Berman, R., & Hannan, P. (1982). Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight. American Journal of Epidemiology, 115, 223–230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski, B., Dunbar, R. I., & Lipowicz, A. (2000). Tall men have more reproductive success. Nature, 403, 156. doi:10.1038/35003107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, K. A., Menard, W., & Fay, C. (2006). Gender similarities and differences in 200 individuals with body dysmorphic disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 47, 77–87. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2005.07.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pirie, P., Jacobs, D., Jeffery, R., & Hannan, P. (1981). Distortion in self-reported height and weight data. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 78, 601–606.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzebon, J. A., Visser, B. A., & Bogaert, A. F. (2011). What makes you think you’re so sexy, tall, and thin? The prediction of self-rated attractiveness, height, and weight. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

  • Ridgeway, R. T., & Tylka, T. L. (2005). College men’s perceptions of ideal body shape. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6, 209–220. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.6.3.209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, G., Linsenmeier, J. A. W., Gygax, L., & Bailey, J. M. (2008). Sexual orientation and childhood gender nonconformity: Evidence from home videos. Developmental Psychology, 44, 46–58. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sear, R., & Marlowe, F. W. (2009). How universal are human mate choices? Size does not matter when Hadza foragers are choosing a mate. Biology Letters, 5, 606–609. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepperd, J. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1989). Attractiveness and height: The role of stature in dating preference, frequency of dating, and perceptions of attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 617–627. doi:10.1177/0146167289154014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smiler, A. P., & Epstein, M. (2010). Issues in the measurement of gender. In J. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology: Vol 1. Gender research in general and experimental psychology (pp. 153–158). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, E. A., Appleby, P. N., Davey, G. K., & Key, T. J. (2002). Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC–Oxford participants. Public Health Nutrition, 5, 561–565. doi:10.1079/PHN2001322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A. L. (1982). The reliability and validity of self-reported weight and height. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 35, 295–309. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(82)90085-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., Jr., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. The American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543. doi:10.1177/000276486029005003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305–325. doi:10.1007/BF02766650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tylka, T. L., Bergeron, D., & Schwartz, J. P. (2005). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Male Body Attitudes Scale (MBAS). Body Image, 2, 161–175. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.03.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, C. D., Fraccaro, P. J., Smith, F. G., Vukovic, J., Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., et al. (2010). Taller men are less sensitive to cues of dominance in other men. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 943–947. doi:10.1093/beheco/arq091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada

    Anthony F. Bogaert & Donald R. McCreary

  2. Department of Community Health Sciences, Brock University, 500 Glenridge Avenue, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada, L2S 3A1

    Anthony F. Bogaert

  3. Department of Psychology, Brock University, 500 Glenridge Avenue, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada, L2S 3A1

    Anthony F. Bogaert

Authors
  1. Anthony F. Bogaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donald R. McCreary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony F. Bogaert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bogaert, A.F., McCreary, D.R. Masculinity and the Distortion of Self-Reported Height in Men. Sex Roles 65, 548–556 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0003-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0003-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation