Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Co-occurrence of Rape Myth Acceptance, Sexism, Racism, Homophobia, Ageism, Classism, and Religious Intolerance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rape myth acceptance has been extensively studied. Little research is available, however, on the relationship of this variable to other oppressive belief systems. A sample of 492 male and 506 female college students completed the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale, the Attitudes Toward Women Scale (short form), the Neosexism Scale, the Modern and Old Fashioned Racism Scale, the Modern Homophobia Scale, a modified version of the Economic Belief Scale, the Fraboni Scale of Ageism, and the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale (short form). Because there were no existing measures of intolerance toward multiple religions, the Religious Intolerance Scale was developed for this study (using relevant items from the Godfrey Richman Isms Scale). Findings here suggested that greater racism (both modern and old fashioned), sexism (both modern and old fashioned), homophobia (toward both gay men and lesbians), ageism, classism, and religious intolerance were each associated with greater rape myth acceptance. Moreover, each belief system collectively added to the prediction of rape myth acceptance, although sexism has the highest overlap with rape myth acceptance. Although gender did not moderate the relationship between oppressive belief systems and rape myth acceptance, results, across analyses, did indicate that men reported greater rape myth acceptance than women did. Results point to the interrelatedness of rape myth acceptance, racism, sexism, homophobia, classism, ageism, and religious intolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbey, A., McAuslan, P., & Ross, L. T. (1998). Sexual assault perpetration by college men: The role of alcohol, misperception of sexual intent, and sexual beliefs and experiences. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 167–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, C. R., Thompson, V. D., Smith, V. A., Gramzow, R. H., & Currey, D. P. (1993). Proximal and distal predictors of homophobia: Framing the multivariate roots of outgroup rejection. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 2013–2042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J. (1980). Child maltreatment: An ecological integration. American Psychologist, 35, 320–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, A. (1992). College men as perpetrators of acquaintance rape and sexual assault: A review of recent research. Journal of American College Health, 40, 175–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, A. D., Burkhart, B. R., & Bourg, S. E. (1994). Research on college men and rape. In A. D. Berkowitz (Ed.), Men and rape: Theory, research, and prevention programs in higher education. New Directions for Student Servicews #65, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). Contexts of child rearing: Problems and prospects. American Psychologist, 34, 844–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. N. (1969). Age-ism; Another form of bigotry. Gerontologist, 9, 243–246.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. N. (1975). Psychiatry and the elderly: An overview. American Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 893–900.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. N. (1978). Thoughts on aging. American Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 14–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B., Schellenberg, E. G., & Senn, C. Y. (1997). Evaluating measures of contemporary sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Parks, L. F., Flores, L., & Culross, P. (2006, July). A comprehensive approach: Linking primary prevention and anti-oppression work. Paper presented at the Regional Sexual Violence Prevention Training Institutes—West, San Diego, CA.

  • Costin, F., & Schwarz, N. (1987). Beliefs about rape and women’s social roles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 46–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty, C. G., & Drambrot, F. H. (1986). Reliability of the attitudes toward women scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 449–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, D. S., & Brannon, R. (1976). The forty-nine percent majority. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducote-Sabey, D. (1999). Assessing student attitudes toward American Indians: A construct validity study. Masters thesis, Oklahoma State University.

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). (2000). The uniform crime reports. Retrieved March 30, 2002, from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/ cius_00/00crime2_4.pdf.

  • Fraboni, M., Saltstone, R., & Hughes, S. (1990). The Fraboni Scale of Ageism (FSA): An attempt at a more precise measure of ageism. Canadian Journal on Aging, 9, 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, R. E. (1993). Stopping rape: A challenge for men. Philadelphia, PA: New Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, R. E. (2006). Reaching men: Strategies for preventing sexist attitudes, behaviors, and violence. Indianapolis, IN: JIST Life.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, S., Richman, C. L., & Withers, T. N. (2000). Reliability and validity of a new scale to measure prejudice: The GRISMS. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 19, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A., Koss, M. P., & Russo, N. F. (1993). Violence against women: Physical and mental health effects: II. Research findings. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 2, 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grauerholz, L. (2000). An ecological approach to understanding sexual revictimization: Linking personal, interpersonal, and sociocultural factors and processes. Child Maltreatment, 5, 5–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, W. W., & Ricketts, W. A. (1980). A strategy for the measurement of homophobia. Journal of Homosexuality, 5(4), 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. E., Kluck, D. L., & Schander, P. R. (1997). Rape myth acceptance and sociodemographic characteristics: A multidimensional analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 693–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (2006). The macho paradox: Why some men hurt women and how all men can help. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., & Dinero, T. E. (1989). Discriminate analysis of risk factors for sexual victimization among a national sample of college women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 242–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., Leonard, K. E., Beezely, D. A., & Oros, C. J. (1985). Nonstranger sexual aggression: A discriminate analysis of the psychological characteristics of the undetected offender. Sex Roles, 12, 981–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalewski, D., McIlwee, J. S., & Prunty, R. (1995). Sexism, racism, and establishmentism. Journal of Black Studies, 26, 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, K., & Lee-Pethel, R. (2006). Preventing sexual and intimate partner violence with racial/ethnic minority communities: Addressing intersectionality. Paper presented at the Regional Sexual Violence Prevention Training Institutes—West, San Diego, CA (July).

  • Larsen, K. S., & Long, E. (1988). Attitudes toward sex-roles: Traditional or egalitarian? Sex Roles, 19, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. K. (1977). A response to inequality: Black women, racism, and sexism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 3, 339–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo, R., & Logan, P. (1977). Investigation of the attitudes toward women scale in western Canada. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 9, 201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B. (2002). Cognitive and behavioral distancing from the poor. American Psychologist, 57, 100–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M., Sockloskie, R. J., Koss, M. P., & Tanaka, J. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 670–681.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, B.P., Van Wie, V., & Gross, A. M. (1996). Date rape risk factors: A review and methodological critique of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 1, 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M. C., & Frieze, I. H. (1997). The measurement of gender-role attitudes: A review and commentary. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messman-Moore, T. L., & Long, P. J. (2002). The role of childhood sexual abuse sequelae in sexual revictimization: An empirical review and theoretical reformulation. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 537–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, W. D., Coleman, E. M., & Haynes, M. R. (1986). Factors related to coercive sexual behavior in a nonclinical sample of males. Violence and Victims, 1, 255–278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. K., & Bean, L. L. (1968). A decade later: A follow up of social class and mental illness. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurius, P. S., & Norris, J. (1996). A cognitive ecological model of women’s response to male sexual coercion in dating. In E. S. Byers & L. F. O’Sullivan (eds.), Sexual coercion in dating relationships (pp. 117–139). New York: Hawthorne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 27–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polimeni, A. M., Hardie, E., & Buzwell, S. (2000). Homophobia among Australian heterosexuals: The role of sex, gender role ideology, and gender role traits. Current Research in Social Psychology, 5, 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raja, S., & Stokes, J. P. (1998). Assessing attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: The Modern Homophobia Scale. Journal of Gays, Lesbian, and Bisexual Identity, 3, 113–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richman, C. L., Kenton, L., Helfst, C., & Gaggar, N. (2004). The probability of intervention: Gender X “isms” effects. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J. (1993). The interface between racism and sexism. Journal of Psychology, 127, 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2004). Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25, 845–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. T. (1971). Homophobia: A tentative personality profile. Psychological Reports, 29, 1091–1094.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L., & Bradley, D. W. (1980). In defense of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale: An affirmation of the validity and reliability. Psychological Reports, 47, 511–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Hahn, E. D. (1997). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale and attitude change in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1972). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, M. R., & Medler, B. R. (1995). Is homophobia a weapon of sexism? Journal of Men’s Studies, 4, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoops, N. (2004). Educational attainment in the United States: 2003. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau. Retrieved June 2, 2006, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/p20-550.pdf.

  • Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., Gristani, C., & Pleck, J. H. (1985). Attitudes toward the male role and their correlates. Sex Roles, 13, 413–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: Plus ca change, plus c’est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wantland, R. (2005). Teaching to learn: Social justice theory and sexual assault prevention. Paper presented at the National Sexual Assault Conference: A National Conference on Sexual Violence Prevention and Intervention, Pittsburgh, PA (September).

  • White, J. W., & Koss, M. P. (1993). Adolescent sexual aggression within heterosexual relationships: Prevalence, characteristics, and causes. In H. E. Barabee, W. L. Marshall & S. M. Hudson (eds.), The juvenile sex offender (pp. 182–202). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Allison C. Aosved or Patricia J. Long.

Appendices

Appendix A

Modified Economic Beliefs Scale.

Items

People who stay on welfare have no desire to worka

Welfare keeps the nation in debta

People who don’t make much money are generally unmotivateda

Equal educational opportunities exist for all people in our societya

Homeless people should get their acts together and become productive members of societya

Too many of my tax dollars are spent to take care of those who are unwilling to take care of themselvesa

If every individual would carry his/her own weight, there would be no povertya

There are more poor people than wealthy people in prisons because poor people commit more crimesa

Poor people are lazy

Most poor people should not have children until they can afford to take care of them

Most poor people aren’t very smart

If given the chance, a poor person would be able to keep a job

Most poor people are in debt because they can’t manage their money

People who live in poverty could benefit from educational opportunities

People living in poverty would rather commit crimes for financial gain than work for a living

  1. aItem used originally by Stevenson & Medler (1995).

Appendix B

Religious Intolerance Scale.

Items

Christians are intolerant of people with other religious beliefsa

Catholics have a “holier than thou” attitudea

Jewish people are deceitful and money hungrya

Athiests and agnostics are more self-centered than people from other religious groupsa

Muslims are more treacherous than other groups of religious peoplea

Wiccan and pagan people practice thinly veiled evil

Many of the social problems in the US today are due to non-Christian religious groups

The Hindu beliefs about reincarnation results in people not taking responsibility for their actions in this life since there is always the next life

Despite what Buddhist people may say, Buddhism isn’t really a religion, but more of a philosophy

  1. aItem used originally by Godfrey et al. (2000).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aosved, A.C., Long, P.J. Co-occurrence of Rape Myth Acceptance, Sexism, Racism, Homophobia, Ageism, Classism, and Religious Intolerance. Sex Roles 55, 481–492 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9101-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9101-4

Keywords

Navigation